Log in

View Full Version : Trade Center Demolition



Christopher
29th December 2003, 01:22
If the Trade Center towers were demolished would that change our perspective on what is happening in our world and what we might do about it?

We have a very serious problem that is actually greater than that of terrorism. Perhaps even greater than pollution or depletion of resources. It can even extend to the out of control populations of our planet.

Most Americans are afraid/unwilling to discuss the implications of the occult relationship of those who control our government. This extends to issues critical to explaining the behaviors we are seeing in the 9-11 investigation. Even if the behaviors cannot be explained any other way. That our government would do such a thing, or allow it, is perhaps unthinkable for some people.

Is it apparent that humanity maybe collectively willing to ignore what must be unconscious control shepherding our descent into global warfare, rather than confront the facts of our unconscious existence?

Life becomes much more complex as we now have to consider that our own government, or a faction within it, has done this. What has been done is that the Trade Center Towers were built to demolish. Yes, it is incredible , but there is a mathematical way to prove it. Frankly, for the last two years the fact of no concrete chunks, the tower center dropping first and the extensive concrete dust have really puzzled me since 9-11-01. No longer.

New information of the Trade Center Tower collapses show with certainty that only a demolition could achieve the effect we witnessed.

The concrete was turned to dust and very small particulate. If the weight of the building is calculated falling the distance it fell and converted into energy applied to making dust out of concrete with a uniform 100 micron size with NO large chunks of concrete, the energy created by the building falling produced ONE MILLIONTH of the energy required to convert the concrete to dust.

Each tower exploded in a smooth wave -- not discrete explosions, but a continuous wave of explosive destruction that moved down the tower.

The above was copied from the below site, that is very comprehensive and the math is there too.

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/e.../expulsion.html (http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/expulsion.html)

The only way to reconcile this analysis is that the thick coatings of the rebar of the cast concrete support core columns were actually made of plastic explosive. This would put enough explosive force in direct contact with the most concrete and enable the instantaneous structural collapse we saw as well as the resulting particulate. Attempting to apply explosives to the exterior of the concrete would have created too much external explosion and made the demo obvious.
After the van blew up in the basement, it and the first floor were remodeled and thermite was added to the outer steel columns to enable the exterior structure to telescope. Remember the roof falling in first? That was the core structure, the thermite around the base took a little longer. The molten puddles of steel in the basement can only be explained by thermite (4,000 F at 30,000 FPS)which was needed to assure a complete and immediate failure with the tower descending directly downward.

At least two questions remain; Why was it done and what are we going to do about it?

http://truthasaur.com/misc/timothy-mcveigh.html

hobosexual
30th December 2003, 03:15
yea, thats some trippy shit man, not quiet sure if i believe it all tho.

Crypticchronoclasm
30th December 2003, 23:33
Christopher Wrote

At least two questions remain; Why was it done and what are we going to do about it?

Only two questions I have 500 hundred

500 questions (http://www.crypticchronoclasm.co.uk/top500questions.htm)

What to do

Tell and show people what you know, they wont belive you. They will remember what you said, and next time they see a program on 9/11 they will watch carefully and try to prove you wrong. This will encourage debate and open their minds to the possibilities of a conspiracy

Christopher
31st December 2003, 01:43
hobosexual


yea, thats some trippy shit man, not quiet sure if i believe it all tho.
Yea. I admit it is a huge stretch for any to just assimilate. However, when the has been NO INVESTIGATION, and the few questions that are obvious in their answer, once the physics are addressed indicate complicity by our government, Americans need to seek out each other and discuss the events, take into account and the consequences of NOT taking comprehensive actions immediately.

I see 3 basic elements that are obvious with the physics of the collapse.
1. Freefall from 1200 feet is 8 seconds and the towers fell in around 9.5 seconds.

2. The energy sink produced as related to the energy required to reduce the concrete to dust.

3. The molten steel in the basement.

Aside from those the 500 Q's link below will inform you some.

Christopher Wrote

At least two questions remain; Why was it done and what are we going to do about it?

Crypticchronoclasm


Only two questions I have 500 hundred

500 questions (http://www.crypticchronoclasm.co.uk/top500questions.htm)

What to do

Tell and show people what you know, they wont belive you. They will remember what you said, and next time they see a program on 9/11 they will watch carefully and try to prove you wrong. This will encourage debate and open their minds to the possibilities of a conspiracy

Actually the dust issue really hits people and they walk away stunned when the obviousness hits them. As soon as I heard it I realized that it had always been an intuitive snag in my acceptance of the official story. There was a big deal made for a month or so concerning the huge quantity of fine particulate that spread out from the trade center.

I have some experience with high explosives in construction blasting. We always tried to make smaller particulate from the rock we worked in as it was easier to handle with heavy equipment. We could NEVER make all of our shots produce all gravel or sand size particle. In order to do it we would have had to throw rock for 1,000 feet.

In the case of the trade center, it was OUT OF THE QUESTION to load enough explosive on the exterior of the concrete to create dust, sand, gravel and NO BIG. CHUNKS. If that quantity had been there it would have been TOTALLY obvious that there were many, many explosive events involved.

The only way to get the particulate produced is to have the charge be very fast, spread out over the entire concrete structure INSIDE the concrete.

I'm telling people all the time. Those who reject the logic or get angry have a HUGE wake up coming to them.

There are 2 basic actions that are fully lawful and doable from a grassroots level. It seems as though the proposals of action cause a mental deadlock. See it here on Che-lives.

http://www.che-lives.com/forum/index.php?a...=ST&f=4&t=20452 (http://www.che-lives.com/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=4&t=20452)