Log in

View Full Version : What the fuck is...? 1



Anarchocommunaltoad
11th December 2012, 01:30
I present to you the first general topic thread intended to ask "What the fuck is this"? If something needs to be expanded it will.

I'll go first:
What the fuck is parecon?

Grenzer
11th December 2012, 01:32
I believe it stands for Participatory Economics.

Anarchocommunaltoad
11th December 2012, 01:36
I believe it stands for Participatory Economics.

Duh. Now what is it? (the 1990s variety)

Red Banana
11th December 2012, 01:53
An economic model crafted by Michael Albert. It's 3 main principles are: proportional self management (decision making power in relation to how much the decision affects you), balanced job complexes (equitably sharing "empowering" and "non-empowering" tasks/jobs in the workplace; abolish the division of labor), and renumeration for work (wages based on the duration, intensity, and onerousness of your work)

I really like the proportional self management and balanced job complexes, but Alberts renumeration or "fair" wages system is absolute nonsense.

GoddessCleoLover
11th December 2012, 02:03
Seems like Michel Albert is a utopian.

Anarchocommunaltoad
11th December 2012, 02:07
What the fuck is your definition of a Utopian?

Red Banana
11th December 2012, 02:19
A bit. I get the impression from him that he just wants to be the 21st century Marx so he needs his own theory to differentiate himself from the rest. That's no good excuse for advocating reforming rather than abolishing the wages system.

Nevertheless, I belong to a (at least nominally) pareconist organization: www.iopsociety.org/ I'm sure if you read znet at all you've heard about this more than once lol

It looks like it has some potential and I encourage you guys to check it out and join. It's an interim organization so nothing is set in stone until the founding convention. Hopefully if there are enough (and I think there are) non pareconists in the organization we can push out the renumeration shit and the like.

Anarchocommunaltoad
11th December 2012, 03:02
What the fuck would be the difference between ian and ist? (marxist versus marxian)

Yuppie Grinder
11th December 2012, 03:04
A Marxian is a subscriber to the philosophy of history and social science called Historical Materialism, but they don't necessarily have revolutionary socialist politics.
A Marxist is a subscriber to Historical Materialist and believes in the Communist doctrine of the emancipation of all the worlds exploited and oppressed peoples.

GoddessCleoLover
11th December 2012, 03:05
The fucking emphasis is different. The fucking use of the fucking suffix -ist is fucking quasi-religious.:D

GoddessCleoLover
11th December 2012, 03:07
A Marxian is a subscriber to the philosophy of history and social science called Historical Materialism, but they don't necessarily have revolutionary socialist politics.
A Marxist is a subscriber to Historical Materialist and believes in the Communist doctrine of the emancipation of all the worlds exploited and oppressed peoples.

I meant it in the sense that I don't view Marxism as a dogma or a religion. Your explanation is a better articulation. I expressed myself in an idiosyncratic way.

cantwealljustgetalong
11th December 2012, 18:22
What the fuck is your definition of a Utopian?

"Utopian" refers to the French (and British) socialist tendency to spend more time planning socialism than worrying about how to implement it. This tendency had a direct influence on Marx's politics and is given a critique within the Manifesto. Marx's attitude towards this tendency can be best described as people creating "recipes for future kitchens".

the term is currently used to describe people who exhibit similar traits: planning a new society instead of focusing on how to get there.

Rugged Collectivist
11th December 2012, 19:31
This is a great idea for a thread!

I've got one. What the fuck is proletocracy.

Ravachol
11th December 2012, 19:43
It's capital wearing the mask of self-management. Also, its a blueprint that'll be unworkable and outdated if it's ever going to be realized.

The Douche
11th December 2012, 19:47
Proletocracy is a revleft meme, it was an idea advocated by DNZ that means nothing in the real world.

Ravachol
11th December 2012, 20:08
Note: What I said was meant for both PareCon and 'proletocracy', though I'm sceptical to what extend I would call 'proletocracy' capital wearing the mask of self-management, as I don't think it even wears that mask.

Zukunftsmusik
11th December 2012, 20:12
What the fuck is your definition of a Utopian?

see my sig

Yuppie Grinder
12th December 2012, 01:25
Proletocracy is a revleft meme, it was an idea advocated by DNZ that means nothing in the real world.

He pretty much uses really obscure made up language to mask how intellectually bankrupt his thought is.

Rugged Collectivist
12th December 2012, 01:32
So it's just something DNZ made up? Okay. I have another one.

What the fuck do people mean when they talk about economism and political struggle.

GoddessCleoLover
12th December 2012, 02:21
Economism and political struggle are usually counterposed, with the former referring to the trade union oriented struggle for better pay and conditions of employment while the latter refers to broader struggles.

helot
12th December 2012, 02:24
Why the fuck do some socialists have this obsession with picking sides in capitalist vs capitalist conflicts on the otherside of the planet when they have absolutely no influence in it?

Yuppie Grinder
12th December 2012, 03:58
Why the fuck do some socialists have this obsession with picking sides in capitalist vs capitalist conflicts on the otherside of the planet when they have absolutely no influence in it?

becuz anti-emperielizm!!!!!!!!!!!11

GoddessCleoLover
12th December 2012, 04:01
I suppose it gives them a feeling of importance to have a "line" on all major world events, whether or not that "line" is or is not well-reassoned.

Die Neue Zeit
12th December 2012, 08:40
It's capital wearing the mask of self-management. Also, its a blueprint that'll be unworkable and outdated if it's ever going to be realized.

It's related to revolutionary strategy, and related to the need for worker-class political power, something which you really need to understand.


So it's just something DNZ made up? Okay. I have another one.

What the fuck do people mean when they talk about economism and political struggle.

What Gramsci Guy said is only partially correct:


You're describing narrow economism. Broad economism however, to put it simply, encompasses every type of politics (within the communist sense) that doesn't put the fight for radical democracy and, as such, proletarian political hegemony, first.

Grenzer
12th December 2012, 09:01
Ravachol understands revolutionary strategy, he just knows that it is to be found within the present conditions of class struggle, not within the desiccated corpses of the failures of the past.

The Douche
12th December 2012, 16:02
Why the fuck do some socialists have this obsession with picking sides in capitalist vs capitalist conflicts on the otherside of the planet when they have absolutely no influence in it?

Because they have hardman fantasies about running and gunning through city streets.

GoddessCleoLover
12th December 2012, 16:16
Because they have hardman fantasies about running and gunning through city streets.

Those who fantasize about running and gunning might want to keep it in the fantasy realm lest they shit their pants when confronted with the real deal.

Anarchocommunaltoad
12th December 2012, 16:20
What the fuck is the cause of most sit in protests devolving into drum circles?

Dennis the 'Bloody Peasant'
12th December 2012, 16:25
What the fuck is the cause of most sit in protests devolving into drum circles?

Satan. or someone who's methods are his?

GoddessCleoLover
12th December 2012, 16:25
What the fuck is the cause of most sit in protests devolving into drum circles?

We didn't used to do that shit back in the 70s. Must be some New Age-y thing that Occupiers like to do, along with hand signals and daily GAs. I would prefer that protests devolve into Avantian orgies.

Dennis the 'Bloody Peasant'
12th December 2012, 16:27
^--- Yeah, what Gramsci said was probably more accurate


Satan. or someone who's methods are his?

The Douche
12th December 2012, 16:37
Tighten up or the thread will have to get closed, thanks.

GoddessCleoLover
12th December 2012, 16:43
How does one tighten up a thread that began as random speculation?:confused:

The Douche
12th December 2012, 16:47
I don't think its "random speculation" I think people are asking questions and getting answers. It's the learning forum, and it should be more serious in here especially, because new posters don't need to be bombarded by dumb shit.

Anarchocommunaltoad
12th December 2012, 20:14
I don't think its "random speculation" I think people are asking questions and getting answers. It's the learning forum, and it should be more serious in here especially, because new posters don't need to be bombarded by dumb shit.

I meant this thread to be both. Can you just close it so i can put What the fuck is...? II in chitchat?