Log in

View Full Version : 'A Disagreement'



Ravachol
21st November 2012, 15:51
Thought you folks might enjoy the PM this illustrious fellow sent me: :laugh:



"I don't want to be united with a bunch of goons who think that because they have some 'grand theory of history' (what a laugh, really worked out well the first few times didn't it)"

The above is a quote from you, from the thread about the KKE (correctly) defending their peaceful demonstration from anarchists who were throwing molotov cocktails at them and trying to launch a ridiculous, futile attack on the Greek parliament that would set the working class movement back a decade. My simple answer (simple because you're too thick to understand anything else) is that yes, it worked out great in the USSR (until Stalin's death) and every Socialist country that exists nowadays. I hope you see the error of your ways soon or that you promptly go the way of that counter-revolutionary scum**** Trotsky.

GoddessCleoLover
21st November 2012, 15:58
About what I would expect from a "marxleninstalinmao" who thinks that things were great in the USSR until 1953.

hatzel
21st November 2012, 16:35
hobbeslockerousseaurawls

aristotleavicennamaimonidesspinoza


Why don't people have names like this ever? :(

Ravachol
21st November 2012, 17:09
Marxpannekoekmattick

Bordigacamatteperlman

Nietzschebataillefoucault

Yeah that doesn't work at all...

Blake's Baby
21st November 2012, 17:19
Doesn't work because you need four names, not three. Marxengelsluxemburgbordiga is obviously an awesome name.

Ostrinski
21st November 2012, 17:23
*Sigh* Ravachol will never drop his Trotskyist ways.

hatzel
21st November 2012, 17:32
marxlenintrotskyravachol, you say?

Ele'ill
21st November 2012, 21:37
get trolled in pm enable troll by making thread about pm

Ravachol
22nd November 2012, 00:09
https://images.encyclopediadramatica.se/thumb/9/96/Coolface_troll_seal.png/250px-Coolface_troll_seal.png

GoddessCleoLover
22nd November 2012, 00:21
Not sure the PM was a troll post. The Stalinoids would send revolutionaries who don't support their pretensions to Kolyma or torture and shoot us. They would be regard as their duty to follow in the path of Iosif Vissarionovich. I think the guy was as serious as cancer.

Vladimir Innit Lenin
22nd November 2012, 00:38
sent me the same post, with the same Scum- ending. Classy troll.

GoddessCleoLover
22nd November 2012, 00:42
Still don't think he is a troll, rather prolly some tankie who is compiling his list of counter-revolutionaries to be sent to Kolyma.

The Douche
22nd November 2012, 20:53
I got a similar one as well, I infracted the user for flaming and prejudiced language, in addition to the infractions they received for the same issues from Psycho.

I don't think they're going to last very long around here.


Edit, here is what he sent me:


You probably won't read this and reply; after all, Trots and Narcos can never back up their bullshit opinions with anything other than bourgeois lies anyway, but I shall try nonetheless and be the martyr that I seemingly always am. Hopefully, you will have the guts to at least respond. Here goes...

What a pathetic excuse for an admin you are; not only are you far less objective than an admin should be, you actively take the wrong side when you are subjective, and have completely misinterpreted the situation back about a year ago when the KKE defended themselves against anarchist hooligans and stopped them from launching a pointless and futile attack on the Greek parliament.

I'm going to try and make it simple for you (apparently that is necessary, considering your level of intelligence). The KKE (and specifically PAME) had organised a peaceful protest- a concept which, believe me, I have problems with too considering how little it achieves in isolation- outside the Greek parliament. Anarchists turned up and attacked the KKE protesters, attempting to storm parliament. Let me say once and for all: Storming parliament would have achieved NOTHING. It would have failed miserably and the perpetrators would have been forgotten. Those are the true counter-revolutionary actions- committing actions that would set the prospects of revolution back years. The KKE were acting in a revolutionary fashion by helping the workers in the long-term; only a true Marxist-Leninst party can be the vanguard party of the working class. Only Marxist-Leninists have ever launched a successful revolution (see USSR, Cuba, DPRK...). Why can't you see this?

Oh yeah and inb4 "North Korea blah blah blah blah...."!

I half expect myself to end up banned for this- after all, that's what happens to true communists on Revleft, but, like I said, martyr and all that...

Ostrinski
23rd November 2012, 00:06
Man, it's funny as balls when these ultra Stalinist weirdos call everyone who disagrees with them Trotskyists :lol:. It just shows how little educated they are on other socialist positions and how narrow the prism is that they see things through.

hatzel
23rd November 2012, 01:17
Stop being such a Trot, Os...

Ostrinski
23rd November 2012, 01:21
You must be a Trot for even consenting to the passing of the notion through your Trotskyist brain that I could, in some universe, possibly be a Trot. Trot.

Yet_Another_Boring_Marxist
23rd November 2012, 01:37
The funny thing about dogmatic Marxist-Leninists is that their ideology is supposed to be a creative interpretation of Marxist science, so idealism on their behalf is utterly absurd.

Ostrinski
23rd November 2012, 01:45
Comrades, we must be vigilant and fully aware if we are not only to guard our wits against mental revisionism but also against a new menace, mental Trotskyism which has manifested itself in the rapid decay of mental revision. In accordance with the material conditions of contemporary society, the mental revision of anti-communist revisionists has degenerated to the extent of taking upon an entirely new social character. We can accurately characterize this new and unique 21st brand of mental revision as mental Trotskyism, because of its unprecedented regenerative abilities to create new platforms of deviation and opportunism from and against our anti-revisionist countenance.

We must act quickly and decisively if we are to formulate a constructive Marxist materialist analysis of this interesting albeit sinister development, for it may not be long before we ourselves, for all of our revolutionary devotion and unbreakable resolve for counter-revision, may involuntarily or even unconsciously be robbed of our anti-revisionist principles by the hobgoblin of mental Trotskyism. What a world we live in.

They won't get me without a fight, though, I will tell you that.

Yet_Another_Boring_Marxist
23rd November 2012, 02:00
The trots are sabotaging the imaginary revolution again.

Quickly my comrade, to the bat mobile!

Comrade Samuel
23rd November 2012, 04:18
AAAHHHHRRRHGGG TROTS, TROTS EVERYWHERE!!!!

This dude is a total tool and I'm suprised he hasn't been banned yet. We now return you to your regularly scheduled M-L bashing.

statichaos
27th November 2012, 17:50
I've never heard of "The Trots" being used to refer to anything but a case of diarrhea, so the past few posts on this thread have unintentionally caused some interesting imagery for me.

Yet_Another_Boring_Marxist
28th November 2012, 04:35
I've never heard of "The Trots" being used to refer to anything but a case of diarrhea, so the past few posts on this thread have unintentionally caused some interesting imagery for me.

Thank you for making my discussions with the Trots much more bearable :P