View Full Version : Revolution Is Universal
Avanti
20th November 2012, 15:47
no human being brought under in the system can make a revolution
you are caught in the mental matrix of Babylon
you are confused
education, media, boxes and parents have maladjusted your synapses
there are several boxes
we live our lives inside boxes
four walls, a floor and a ceiling
one door
maybe a few windows
what you see through your windows ain't real
it becomes real when you can touch it, dig into it, taste it, feel it, sense it, be it
our civilization is a civilization of boxes
boxes where we live
boxes where we are indoctrinated
boxes where we get stuff
boxes where we do stuff so we get money so we can get stuff
boxes are named after their functionality
functionalities are a sign of alienation, to ascribe certain functions and deny your individuality and the reality of the existence
your parents were indoctrinated
by their church, by their schools, by their party
you are indoctrinated too
indoctrinated into our language
our language is a tool of oppression, a tool for ascribing and legetimizing what makes us unfree
being a human should be a wonderful experience, but is turned into a world of exploitation, treason, sadism, violence and fear, a brutal existence of torturing the mind, all brought by the overlords of Babylon, the great captains of finance and industry
the truth however is
that it is you who are oppressing yourself
you are reproducing the systems of oppression inside your own mind and heart
you are filled with concepts shaped by your upbringing in a world of boxes
in a world of being boxed in
we need to drill our way to heaven
identifying the internalization of oppression is the way
you must begin by making a revolution against yourself
and question all norms and foundations for society
instead of being inside boxes, looking out
we'll wander between the boxes
that's our dimension which our physical bodies interact with
we the barefoot lost children of Babylon
we who will need to walk through the urban jungle to cleanse ourselves from all the lies and oppression within our minds
this generation is lost
if a new generation can be raised outside the gaze of the pyramid eye of Babylon
there is hope
hope for true communism to free humanity
hope that we can roam around like wild and free beings, surrounded by our universal love
but no one born dead, born inside the machine, know what the light is
only the lost children know
only the weed can liberate the garden
Jesus Saves Gretzky Scores
20th November 2012, 15:58
*slow clap*
hatzel
20th November 2012, 16:06
being a human should be a wonderful experience, but is turned into a world of exploitation, treason, sadism, violence and fear, a brutal existence of torturing the mind, all brought by the overlords of Babylon, the great captains of finance and industry
A lesser man that me would call this structural antisemitism. However, I'm not a lesser man than me (in fact I'm greater than or equal to me) so instead I'll just call it boring-ass liberalism / pseudo-radical posturing, not unlike the rest of this post...
ind_com
20th November 2012, 16:09
the truth however is
that it is you who are oppressing yourself
No, the ruling classes are.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 16:17
A lesser man that me would call this structural antisemitism. However, I'm not a lesser man than me (in fact I'm greater than or equal to me) so instead I'll just call it boring-ass liberalism / pseudo-radical posturing, not unlike the rest of this post...
you are very 'fraid of your shadows.
how can you liberate the world unless you are liberating yourself from yourself?
also, my communism is far more radical than yours.
one million times more radical your communism than your communism is more radical than slavery.
Comrade #138672
20th November 2012, 20:19
No, the ruling classes are.Indeed.
you are very 'fraid of your shadows.
how can you liberate the world unless you are liberating yourself from yourself?
also, my communism is far more radical than yours.
one million times more radical your communism than your communism is more radical than slavery.My Communism is even bigger!
Avanti
20th November 2012, 20:30
but my communism got lasers!
:lol:
l'Enfermé
20th November 2012, 20:31
My communism is this big
http://acidcow.com/pics/20100621/how_big_17.jpg
Comrade Samuel
20th November 2012, 20:58
People laugh at the size of my communism. :crying:
Hit The North
20th November 2012, 21:08
I oppressed myself this morning. And I liked it.
hatzel
20th November 2012, 21:15
also, my communism is far more radical than yours.
Your communism involves the claim that a 'beautiful' human essence is being held back by the evil schemes of some mysterious, shadowy global cabal. This is not radical in any sense. You blame 'the pyramid eye of Babylon' - since when did radicals entertain themselves with talk of the Illuminati? Instead of analysing social structures and processes, you lay the blame at some ill-defined group steering the masses, as if oppression is the simple result of naughty people doing naughty things. Radicalism is lacking, usurped by a shallow liberal analysis.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 21:33
Your communism involves the claim that a 'beautiful' human essence is being held back by the evil schemes of some mysterious, shadowy global cabal. This is not radical in any sense. You blame 'the pyramid eye of Babylon' - since when did radicals entertain themselves with talk of the Illuminati? Instead of analysing social structures and processes, you lay the blame at some ill-defined group steering the masses, as if oppression is the simple result of naughty people doing naughty things. Radicalism is lacking, usurped by a shallow liberal analysis.
Babylon is not a shadowy cabal of people
Babylon is the state-corporate-financial complex
capitalism as sub-sentience and meta-sentience
capitalism is a process of self-replicating oppressions both inside (internally, the mind) and outside (externally, the society)
all this together is the matrix
you cannot break free as long as you are within the system
because even if you overthrow the system
you will just rebuild it, while calling it "socialism"
it will still have schools, police stations, money, theft of a third of the time of all human beings, armies, boxes, soldiers, prisons and committees or "vanguard parties"
everything will have changed
everything will stay the same
that is because you ignore the mind
the conditioning of the mind determines our courses of action
and having grown up in a hierarchic, anti-human society based on exploitation
we'll all are sick
some less than others
but we'll all sick
people indoctrinated through all the structures of this system
cannot make a revolution
you will just perpetuate the old relationships post-revolution
it doesn't matter if the state owns the means of production
it's still exploitation
and that'll happen
because the minds of the people is sick
only a generation brought up outside the system
can hope to overthrow it
thence Cyberpunk NeoTribes
GoddessCleoLover
20th November 2012, 21:39
If we destroy capitalism throughout the entire world perhaps we can build something truly different and better. Cyberpunk neo-Tribes seems a roundabout way of accomplishing this task. The proletariat can accomplish the task.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 21:42
If we destroy capitalism throughout the entire world perhaps we can build something truly different and better. Cyberpunk neo-Tribes seems a roundabout way of accomplishing this task. The proletariat can accomplish the task.
the point is, we can not
because if we overthrow it tomorrow morning
we'll rebuild the relationships tomorrow afternoon
because we're all been brought up under conditions that's destroyed our values
the proletariat cares mostly for bread and circuses
and dreams of owning their own houses, their own cars, to send their kids to colllege and to increase in class status
the only ones who can lead a revolution
are the wretched of the earth
the lost children of Babylon
the NeoTribes
Comrade #138672
20th November 2012, 21:47
the point is, we can not
because if we overthrow it tomorrow morning
we'll rebuild the relationships tomorrow afternoon
because we're all been brought up under conditions that's destroyed our values
the proletariat cares mostly for bread and circuses
and dreams of owning their own houses, their own cars, to send their kids to colllege and to increase in class status
the only ones who can lead a revolution
are the wretched of the earth
the lost children of Babylon
the NeoTribesSo are you anti-worker?
Avanti
20th November 2012, 21:50
no.
but the working class is dying out.
and evidently, the worker class is very much anti-worker.
which makes
either the vanguard of the proletariat has failed
or the workers want something different
than the vanguard of the proletariat
i am not a worker
i'm a lumpenproletarian
the longest time i've had an employment
was six weeks
Comrade #138672
20th November 2012, 21:56
no.
but the working class is dying out.
and evidently, the worker class is very much anti-worker.
which makes
either the vanguard of the proletariat has failed
or the workers want something different
than the vanguard of the proletariat
i am not a worker
i'm a lumpenproletarian
the longest time i've had an employment
was six weeksWell, you're still part of the working class. I think that you should identify with the working class.
No. I don't think the working class is dying out. It will stay very big and will probably become even bigger.
The Garbage Disposal Unit
20th November 2012, 21:57
I don't think Avanti's communism (as confusingly articulated as it may be) involves a shadowy cabal or anything quite so esoteric. Rather, behind the poetics, there is, in my reading (please correct me if I'm wrong, Avanti), a grasp of the relationship of domination wherein, for example, the working class materially reproduces capitalism by its labour. Probably you could just read Avanti's posts as dialectical materialism in the words of Lewis Carol or something.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 21:58
if your beliefs make you happier
then you shall hold on to them
who knows
maybe you can form
a NeoTribe
which dresses like 1930-style workers
Avanti
20th November 2012, 22:00
I don't think Avanti's communism (as confusingly articulated as it may be) involves a shadowy cabal or anything quite so esoteric. Rather, behind the poetics, there is, in my reading (please correct me if I'm wrong, Avanti), a grasp of the relationship of domination wherein, for example, the working class materially reproduces capitalism by its labour. Probably you could just read Avanti's posts as dialectical materialism in the words of Lewis Carol or something.
allegorical speech
is the superior form of speech
you can hide a dozen truths
in a sentence
that doesn't make any immediate sense for the conscious
my words are a stream of bullets
piercing through the conscious
penetrating deep into the subconscious
before we can rebel against Babylon
we must rebel against the Babylon within
Comrade #138672
20th November 2012, 22:02
allegorical speech
is the superior form of speech
you can hide a dozen truths
in a sentence
that doesn't make any immediate sense for the conscious
my words are a stream of bullets
piercing through the conscious
penetrating deep into the subconscious
before we can rebel against Babylon
we must rebel against the Babylon withinYes, we should rebel against Capitalism from within too, but this doesn't mean that workers are oppressing themselves.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 22:12
i cannot see
how people indoctrinated through their parents, schools, media, commercials, the state, the laws
can be able to not reproduce oppression when the system collapses
most new systems have just reproduced social hierarchies under new names
NeoTribes are superior, because they are small
they are egalitarian
they are flexible
they are outside the chain of production
and necessitates a new thinking
a de-intoxication of the mind
but the first and second generations won't be able to do a true revolution
only the third generation can
TheRedAnarchist23
20th November 2012, 22:26
Avanti's rep reached 100 in just some days due to the stuff he writes.
How come my rep does not go up 100 when I write my nonsence?
Is it because I do not write it like Avanti does?
First
We must become conscious
Of society
Then we can begin
to think on how to change it
There you go, now where are my 100 reps!?
The Garbage Disposal Unit
20th November 2012, 22:30
before we can rebel against Babylon
we must rebel against the Babylon within
I have to disagree - I think the two are inextricably intertwined. After all, on what basis can our consciousness develop within the material confines on the capitalist totality? The tail, as it goes, doesn't wag the dog, but neither, by the same token, does the dog wag the tail outside of the context that produces the dog, and it impossible to take any of the elements in-and-of-itself and derive meaningful conclusions from them. If we insist on developing the correct consciousness for the reality we'd like to live in, we'll wait forever - on the contrary, we must act within and against the current reality, and come to daggers drawn with it. "A revolution" isn't a thing - it is a process, within which (capitalist) subjects are confronted with themselves-as-such as a material limit to be overcome. This "overcoming" is the basis communism - and the subjective transformation that I understand you to be talking about.
(See also - the shit in my signature)
Avanti
20th November 2012, 22:40
we'll don't wait forever
if we act
we act
by liberating ourselves
and become hunter-gatherers
in the neon forests
of collapsing mega-cities
under decaying Cyberpunk capitalism
the working class is dying out
replaced by machines
all governed by the great machine
which is ruled
by the pyramid eye of Babylon
the masses
will be stranded
without healthcare or education
they will finally be free from the shackles
now we must liberate them spiritually
revolution is about idealism
about externalizing what is internal
what cannot be expressed in words
only expressed through actions
hatzel
20th November 2012, 22:48
all governed by the great machine
which is ruled
by the pyramid eye of Babylon
Stop saying this and then claiming you're not talking about conspiracies. You were getting better for a moment, after you dropped all this talk of 'overlords' and the Illuminati, but now you're right back in it. Saying 'I'm not talking about a conspiracy, I'm talking about a complex/machine/etc.' means nothing whatsoever if you continue to position a conspiracy behind said complex/machine/etc. Conspiracy rhetoric is inherently reactionary.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 22:51
Stop saying this and then claiming you're not talking about conspiracies. You were getting better for a moment, after you dropped all this talk of 'overlords' and the Illuminati, but now you're right back in it. Saying 'I'm not talking about a conspiracy, I'm talking about a complex/machine/etc.' means nothing whatsoever if you continue to position a conspiracy behind said complex/machine/etc. Conspiracy rhetoric is inherently reactionary.
conspiracy rhetoric is effective
the conspiracists blow it
when they go into details and specifics
no details
no specifics
the dumber the better
if there is no illuminati
we'll have to invent them
as an allegory
for a reality
too complex to grasp
talking too much about the labour theory of value
proletarians
surplus
exploitation
divides the hatred of the masses
better keep it unified
but vague
so everyone can read what they want into what they read
GoddessCleoLover
20th November 2012, 22:54
That is a rather cynical theory of politics. I hope that you are being facetious.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 23:19
politics is cynicism
politics is just a role-playing game
which leaves all dreams broken
hatzel
20th November 2012, 23:26
conspiracy rhetoric is effective
the conspiracists blow it
when they go into details and specifics
no details
no specifics
the dumber the better
if there is no illuminati
we'll have to invent them
as an allegory
for a reality
too complex to grasp
talking too much about the labour theory of value
proletarians
surplus
exploitation
divides the hatred of the masses
better keep it unified
but vague
so everyone can read what they want into what they read
Pull your head out of your jacksy so that you can shove your privilege up it. This is an open door to antisemitism; any half-decent radical politics wouldn't touch this shit with a bargepole.
Avanti
20th November 2012, 23:30
Pull your head out of your jacksy so that you can shove your privilege up it. This is an open door to antisemitism; any half-decent radical politics wouldn't touch this shit with a bargepole.
awareness
is not knowing fancy words
it is knowing
when something is a threat or not
people are most afraid of what they don't really know
none of us really knows about what capitalism is
because we only see small parts of it
do you really know we're not controlled by robot insects from a parallel dimension in the future?
really?
you see
therefore, the best is to be vague
fun that you talk about privilege
i know i am privileged
when i was 12, i ran away from home
the same autumn, i was molested by a wannabe rich stockbroker
since age 14, i haven't sat my foot inside a school building, except when i burnt down one
i have had my left arm scarred by fire
a nazi broke all my fingers on my left hand
i have been beaten by the german riot police
i have lived on the streets
have you ever lied under a carbon blanket in zero degrees and trying to sleep for a few minutes?
have you ever got lost in a forest for one week, living on wild berries?
i consider myself privileged
i have had experiences very few people in first world countries have had
i am a survivor
i know the language of the survivors
ÑóẊîöʼn
21st November 2012, 00:03
allegorical speech
is the superior form of speech
you can hide a dozen truths
in a sentence
that doesn't make any immediate sense for the conscious
my words are a stream of bullets
piercing through the conscious
penetrating deep into the subconscious
before we can rebel against Babylon
we must rebel against the Babylon within
Allegory's great for the arts, but when dealing with reality we need to be precise. Allegory isn't precise.
Avanti
21st November 2012, 00:11
allegory allows us to transmit infinite proposals in one sentence.
preciseness is exclusive.
and thus fractional.
and serves to enslave the human mind.
Avanti
21st November 2012, 00:22
allegory allows us to transmit infinite proposals in one sentence.
preciseness is exclusive.
and thus fractional.
and serves to enslave the human mind.
Anarchocommunaltoad
21st November 2012, 03:48
allegory allows us to transmit infinite proposals in one sentence.
preciseness is exclusive.
and thus fractional.
and serves to enslave the human mind.
And there you have it folks, the wisdom of folly is upon us
ÑóẊîöʼn
21st November 2012, 11:56
allegory allows us to transmit infinite proposals in one sentence.
preciseness is exclusive.
and thus fractional.
and serves to enslave the human mind.
But the "infinite proposals" are subject to the interpretation of the reader. Precision is exclusive, yes, but for the right reasons - it excludes that which is incorrect or vague. It's not fractional if it is based on objective evidence rather than subjective opinion. Knowing the precise truth about the workings of the universe does anything but enslave human minds. In fact, the more we know about the universe to greater degrees of precision, the more ability we have to change the universe to suit ourselves.
That's not enslavement, that's empowerment.
Avanti
21st November 2012, 12:06
the more we know
the less we know
and that is the beauty of knowledge
if everything is excluded and we know everything
everything would be meaningless
we need myths
we need raunching wild dreams
we need mysticism
we need passion
ÑóẊîöʼn
21st November 2012, 12:19
the more we know
the less we know
and that is the beauty of knowledge
While it is often the case that answering one question opens up new questions, so what? We're still getting answers. More questions provide the opportunity for more answers.
if everything is excluded and we know everything
everything would be meaningless
But can we know everything? We won't know if we don't try.
we need myths
we need raunching wild dreams
we need mysticism
we need passion
We've had those things for far longer than we have had scientific methods of enquiry. Yet which one has helped to transform the human world?
Avanti
21st November 2012, 12:26
transform it into a global prison
where children are physically tortured
molested
and indoctrinated
having their entire childhood stolen
where most people are eating anti-depressants
and feeling badly
there's no true beauty in Babylon
just an empty and meaningless race to the top for the individual
and a race to the bottom for the Earth
humans need both a brain, a mind and a heart
ÑóẊîöʼn
21st November 2012, 12:37
transform it into a global prison
where children are physically tortured
molested
and indoctrinated
having their entire childhood stolen
where most people are eating anti-depressants
and feeling badly
Worse shit was happening before the earliest scientific methods were a twinkle in an Enlightenment scholar's eye. It happened to more of the population as well. And we didn't have nearly as many drugs to help with the resulting pain and illness.
I have a good friend who would have killed himself were it not for anti-depressants, so you should feel fucking ashamed of yourself.
Avanti
21st November 2012, 12:39
the reason your friend needed anti-depressants
was because the system messed him up
in a natural society
where humans aren't denied their humanity
where we aren't forced to sit on our asses all the time
people will feel better and more healthy
ÑóẊîöʼn
21st November 2012, 13:06
the reason your friend needed anti-depressants
was because the system messed him up
in a natural society
where humans aren't denied their humanity
where we aren't forced to sit on our asses all the time
people will feel better and more healthy
A better society won't be formed by abandoning politics. It won't be formed by abandoning science and the fruits of the Enlightenment. It won't be formed by mythologising and magical thinking. We've lived like that before, and what was a consequence of that? Fucking Christendom, that's what.
Avanti
21st November 2012, 13:09
original christianity was corrupted by the roman empire
the elite will try to corrupt everything
even the teachings of avanti
anti-avanti propaganda is frequent here
but maybe the leaders of revleft
are selected
to catch revolutionaries
and prevent them
from reaching a higher consciousness
by distracting the people
with discussions
about trotsky-vs-stalin?
ÑóẊîöʼn
21st November 2012, 13:15
Nope, Christianity has been rotten since the very beginning. It started as a heretical strand of Judaism and got worse from there.
If you think that the staff on this forum have been specially selected to block the spread of whatever idiosyncratic syncretic mess of an ideology you're holding to today, then you have an extremely over-inflated sense of your own importance or significance.
As for Trotsky v Stalin, that's an argument older than the internet, let alone this website.
Avanti
21st November 2012, 13:41
Nope, Christianity has been rotten since the very beginning. It started as a heretical strand of Judaism and got worse from there.
If you think that the staff on this forum have been specially selected to block the spread of whatever idiosyncratic syncretic mess of an ideology you're holding to today, then you have an extremely over-inflated sense of your own importance or significance.
As for Trotsky v Stalin, that's an argument older than the internet, let alone this website.
the Christ came
to elevate the wretched of the Earth
his teachings were corrupted
look after those
who wants to corrupt
the teachings of the Avanti
NeoAnarchism is not an ideology
NeoAnarchism is life, love and existence
it's the water of life
it's the spiritual and existential truth
in your heart
you know it's true
and it can only grow
the Avanti
is a guerilla fighter
his words are his bullets
penetrating the shadows of ignorance
with the light of Communism
soon
Revleft
will be
AvantiLeft
JimmyVi
21st November 2012, 13:47
I have read all . That's great .
ÑóẊîöʼn
21st November 2012, 13:49
You're not a messiah. You're a very naughty boy.
By the way, my heart doesn't know anything. It pumps blood around my body quite nicely, though.
Avanti
21st November 2012, 13:59
i am not the messiah
i am the Avanti
and you could be the Avanti as well
you all can
Jimmie Higgins
21st November 2012, 14:08
Avanti's rep reached 100 in just some days due to the stuff he writes.
How come my rep does not go up 100 when I write my nonsence?
Is it because I do not write it like Avanti does?
First
We must become conscious
Of society
Then we can begin
to think on how to change it
There you go, now where are my 100 reps!?
Don't be a biter.:lol:
Avanti's style is ideocyncratic but Avanti's politics (sorry, Avanti, but anti-politics is still a political view) are not nonsense or gibberish as some people have said - the ideas have some pretty clear precidents among a few traddition in and out of anarchist thought - a bit of negri, a bit of Holloway. It doesn't mean you have to agree, but it's not nonsense.
I may not agree with the ideas on a tactical or even conceptual level (I don't think the working class is dieing and I don't think capitalism is qualitativly changing - change and the flow of capital [which translates into fluid changes in the lives of workers] is the nature of capitalism), but they are worthy of dicussion. However if Avanti is dismissive/skeptical of the value of trying to get a concrete handle on politics and strategy, they discussion may not go far with him at any rate:lol:.
But the "infinite proposals" are subject to the interpretation of the reader. Precision is exclusive, yes, but for the right reasons - it excludes that which is incorrect or vague. It's not fractional if it is based on objective evidence rather than subjective opinion. Knowing the precise truth about the workings of the universe does anything but enslave human minds. In fact, the more we know about the universe to greater degrees of precision, the more ability we have to change the universe to suit ourselves.
That's not enslavement, that's empowerment.
And more specifically, in regards to liberation, we can learn from experience and try and figure out what does and does not work. We can't predict anything perfectly, but we can get a better sense of things.
Bourgoise science is very precice when it comes to things that will help capital - it is very idealist and imprecise when it comes to subjects which may have a "revolutionary bias". So social sciences, economics, etc are more obfuscating than enlightening, more bourgois assumptions than universal (as much as it claims to be so). If they can use engineering to make planes fly and skyscrapers and bridges, then there is no "scientific" reason such a developed use of knowlege couldn't also figure out that surplus grain and food can easily feed starving people rather than be thrown away or farmers paid not to grow to maintain prices. So it's not science which is the problem, it's who organizes it and for what purposes.
Why I like poetics for art, but not for politics is for the reasons you wrote.
The scientific discoveries at the dawn of capitalism happened because the rising capitalists needed more precice and better knowledge of the world - to both understand it to change it, and later to just outright commodify it (to dissect, is to destroy as William Blake said as capitalists scrambeled to classify and divide up the world into its commodifyable bits). Workers too will need a precise understanding of the world in order to put it back together again.
Poetics and allegory are good for motivating people, but it's also limiting (and problematic because it can be intepreted for opposite ends by enemies of liberation, as the concerns in this thread of the concept of "illuminati") and it doesn't help people gain an understanding in which they can empower themselves rather than be motivated by others.
The Garbage Disposal Unit
22nd November 2012, 23:19
I think science and theory can be every bit as limiting, every bit as subject to limitation, and every bit as obfuscating as poetics and allegory (and, for that matter, the distinction is more blurry than dictated by so-called "common sense"). One could posit a "pure" science or theory that is "true", but it would have to exist in a vacuum, which of course is a lovely irony, no? To simply dismiss this by saying "it depends who uses it for what purposes" empties it of its historical reality.
While I disagree with Avanti significantly as regards what constitutes effective communist strategy for dismantling "Babylon", I do think their skepticism vis-a-vis hegemonic enlightenment thought - which ultimately carries with it the dead weight of its constituent political project, liberalism - is valid.
That's not to posit a necessity for rejecting science all together - only to say it has to be deeply problematized, and undermined in its status as the only authentic way of knowing.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.