View Full Version : Bal Thackeray, a Hindu nationalist, dies at age 86.
Robespierres Neck
17th November 2012, 22:16
"I am a great admirer of Hitler, and I am not ashamed to say so! I do not say that I agree with all the methods he employed, but he was a wonderful organizer and orator, and I feel that he and I have several things in common... What India really needs is a dictator who will rule benevolently, but with an iron hand."
http://www.aninews.in/contentimages/detail/balthackeray.jpg
Goblin
17th November 2012, 22:18
Glad hes dead!
TheGodlessUtopian
17th November 2012, 22:24
Well, seeing as how the Naxalites are holding up I do not think he is going to get his way. Besides, India coming under the rule of a person/ group that would do to India what Hitler did to Germany seems a bit much; great man theory taken to its predictably lofty conclusion by reactionaries.
l'Enfermé
17th November 2012, 22:34
Good riddance, eh?
ВАЛТЕР
17th November 2012, 22:39
What an asshole. Glad he's out of the way. Although, how many batshit crazy followers did he have?
Sir Comradical
17th November 2012, 23:00
It's disgusting how many people are mourning this scumbag.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/thackerays-stature-was-unique-manmohan/article4106445.ece
Art Vandelay
17th November 2012, 23:02
About time.
GoddessCleoLover
17th November 2012, 23:13
Too bad that he never fell into the hands of the Naxalites. Good riddance to the crypto-Nazi scum.
Beeth
18th November 2012, 07:28
I don't like nationalism of any kind, but one has to distinguish between different forms. Black nationalism, for instance, isn't oppressive like white nationalism. It is a mere reaction, and has to be understood in that connection only. Hindu nationalism should also be understood in the context of Indian history, what Hindus went through in the past, etc.
ind_com
18th November 2012, 07:46
I don't like nationalism of any kind, but one has to distinguish between different forms. Black nationalism, for instance, isn't oppressive like white nationalism. It is a mere reaction, and has to be understood in that connection only. Hindu nationalism should also be understood in the context of Indian history, what Hindus went through in the past, etc.
In the present Indian context, Hindu nationalism, or Brahmanism, is the most reactionary cultural ideology. It is responsible for the oppression and massacre of many non-Hindu communities and lower-caste peoples in India.
Beeth
18th November 2012, 12:09
In the present Indian context, Hindu nationalism, or Brahmanism, is the most reactionary cultural ideology. It is responsible for the oppression and massacre of many non-Hindu communities and lower-caste peoples in India.
This seems to be an exaggeration - Hindus are not a powerful community like evangelical Christians (in the US) to cause damage. Throwing around big words like massacre does not help - hindu nationalists are a nuisance, that's all.
ind_com
18th November 2012, 12:11
This seems to be an exaggeration - Hindus are not a powerful community like evangelical Christians (in the US) to cause damage. Throwing around big words like massacre does not help - hindu nationalists are a nuisance, that's all.
You have no idea of what you're talking about.
Avanti
23rd November 2012, 11:53
from what i heard
from a few christians in a community project i'm in
is that thousands of christians, buddhists and muslims
are killed by hindu nationalists
every year
GoddessCleoLover
23rd November 2012, 15:57
Good point, Avanti. Bai Thackeray incited Hindus to murder those who ascribe to other religions. The more I read about the guy, the more I am convinced that he ought to have been hanged. Too bad he never fell into Naxalite hands.
ind_com
23rd November 2012, 20:41
After his death a girl wrote a comment on Facebook claiming that Mumbai had gone silent out of fear, not respect, for him. For this she was arrested by the police and hit by Shivsena activists while in police-custody.
GoddessCleoLover
23rd November 2012, 20:44
Thanks for posting that ind.com. The fact that the Mumbai police were willing to do the bidding of the Shivsena fascists and arrest and brutalize that courageous young woman is outrageous.
B.K.
24th November 2012, 01:14
It's disgusting how many people are mourning this scumbag.
What India really needs is a dictator who will rule benevolently, but with an iron hand
It all sounds too familiar... Feels bad living in a country where at least 60-70% of population hold quite similar views.
Zostrianos
24th November 2012, 01:40
from what i heard
from a few christians in a community project i'm in
is that thousands of christians, buddhists and muslims
are killed by hindu nationalists
every year
A lot of the violence directed by Hindus against Christians is a reaction to increasing abuses by Christian missionaries in India. E.g., the Orissa riots were triggered when Christians murdered a Hindu swami who was trying to protect tribal villagers against the missionaries (the hit was ordered by an official working for the Christian "charity" World Vision, and self proclaimed Maoists claimed responsibility for the killing), and so the Hindus reacted by attacking local Christian communities - sadly, this only serves to strengthen Hindu nationalism. And as far as extremism goes, Hindu, while dangerous in its own right, doesn't compare to Islamic extremism, not by a long shot.. Moreover, in parts of northern India, the most dangerous terrorist group around is the NLFT, a Christian baptist militia who wants to establish a theocracy in the Tripura region, and they routinely raid villages and forcibly convert local Hindus at gunpoint. And I wouldn't trust the Naxalites to make things better: there's proof of collaboration between them and aggressive missionaries in many parts of India, and some missionaries have reportedly used threats of Naxalite attacks to convert Hindus. So no, I'm not rooting for any faction in India.
hetz
24th November 2012, 02:54
E.g., the Orissa riots were triggered when Christians murdered a Hindu swami who was trying to protect tribal villagers against the missionariesLol you're making it sound as if these missionaries are bloodthirsty murderers armed to the teeth.
I trust what Indian comrades said in this thread.
L.A.P.
24th November 2012, 03:12
Just to clarify Beeth's point, I have bourgeois family in India and they believe the same things Beeth is saying. It's the Indian ideological equivalent of European-American Protestants being threatened by minorities. Bourgeoius Hindus have this crazy belief that what Hindus went through under the Mughal Empire and current relations with Pakistan ("what Hindus went throught in the past" boo fucking hoo with your fake outrage) justifies the fundamentalism and the delusional notion that the Muslim minority are discriminating against the Hindu majority. It's actually really hilarious how oppressed bourgeois Hindus feel they are, they make American evengelicals look rational. Hindu nationalists are by far the most prominent reactionary force terrorizing people, it's not even like one of those things where you have both groups in mutual conflict, it's just Hindu quasi-fascists fucking up Muslim neighborhoods.
Zostrianos
24th November 2012, 03:35
Something I find especially heinous with Hindu nationalism is they're trying to pervert Hinduism (a tolerant faith, unlike Christianity and Islam), into an intolerant, hateful ideology. Their efforts will fail miserably in the end, however they may try.
Sperm-Doll Setsuna
24th November 2012, 04:17
Something I find especially heinous with Hindu nationalism is they're trying to pervert Hinduism (a tolerant faith, unlike Christianity and Islam), into an intolerant, hateful ideology. Their efforts will fail miserably in the end, however they may try.
Except, not really. A faith is bugger all on its own. It doesn't exist separate from the general cultural climate.
GoddessCleoLover
24th November 2012, 04:19
All religions have issues, but didn't the caste system stem from Hinduism?
Zostrianos
24th November 2012, 04:43
It occurs in other faiths in India as well (Indian Christians are subject to it as well), and some scholars have proposed that it was only during the British Raj that caste really became enforced. Caste is by no means unique to Hinduism or India:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_among_South_Asian_Muslims
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste#Europe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_in_Africa
ind_com
24th November 2012, 05:00
It occurs in other faiths in India as well (Indian Christians are subject to it as well), and some scholars have proposed that it was only during the British Raj that caste really became enforced. Caste is by no means unique to Hinduism or India:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_among_South_Asian_Muslims
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste#Europe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_in_Africa
The caste-system has existed for thousands of years in India. It had been the cultural base for Indian slave-society as well as Indian feudalism. It is an inseparable part of Hinduism. Other religions in India have included the caste-system more recently, over the last few centuries, because it is very efficient in keeping the masses down. Still, the official justification of caste-system is to be found only in Hinduism.
ÑóẊîöʼn
24th November 2012, 14:00
What is the official justification?
ind_com
24th November 2012, 16:04
What is the official justification?
The castes were assigned different duties as they popped up from different parts of god's body, and they are better suited than others to do their jobs. A person is reincarnated according to the amount of good and bad deeds he does in his previous birth. So, the lower-castes are themselves responsible for their miserable conditions, and they should be all good and serve the upper-castes well to be born better next time. This is it.
GoddessCleoLover
24th November 2012, 16:46
Doesn't seem progressive to me. Not to mention the issue of the outcastes, the so-called "untouchables". Did this notion predate the British?
ind_com
24th November 2012, 18:35
Doesn't seem progressive to me. Not to mention the issue of the outcastes, the so-called "untouchables".
Of course it's not progressive! It serves as a cultural base for feudal exploitation.
Did this notion predate the British?
Yes, by more than a millennium.
ind_com
24th November 2012, 18:38
Below is a link to a paper on the caste-question. This was accepted by the CPI-Maoist and is the basis of the caste-line of the party. The page also has links to some other Maoist theoretical works from India.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/82355908/Caste-question-Indian-democratic-revolution-ANURADHA-GANDHI
Hex_Omega_
24th November 2012, 20:07
Should have seen the outpouring of grief for this wicked horrible parasite of a human by the media and the sheep alike- vomit inducing apologists to say the least. Nationalism of any kind is dangerous and that chap should have been prosecuted by the law for inciting violence against other religions and communities.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.