Zederbaum
13th November 2012, 18:47
Esteemed comrades,
I am looking for a good work on the origins of Islam.
What I am not looking for
I don’t want a litany of the basic facts (Mohammed did this, Abu Bakr did that). I am familiar as I want to be with those.
I don’t want a recitation of why Islam is inherently backward a la Frank Gaffney and the dimmer wing of the neo-conservatives.
I don’t want a hagiographic account of Islam which spends half its time justifying Islam’s various peculiarities or one that simply treats its doctrines as if there is a reasonable chance of them being literally true.
What I am looking for
I would like a social history based on historical materialism. Something along the lines of Kautsky’s The Foundations of Christianity. Applied historical materialism if you like.
That book takes a long and broad view of the epoch, looking at everything from economic fundamentals, e.g. how the peasant economy was displaced by an aristocracy reliant on war and slave labour which in turn raised technical barriers and caused political exhaustion thereby preventing further social evolution, to how these long-term processes received ideological expression through intense social alienation and a turning away from engagement with this world in favour of salvation in the hereafter.
I am not sure if such a work is as applicable to Islam, which is pretty much a recapitulated version of Judaism and early non-Trinitarian Christianity that managed to hit the jackpot in terms of achieving an imperial level of power quite early on.
Thus its very status as a particularly successful variant of Abrahamianism may signify nothing more than that the fortunes of aristocratic empires are prone to catastrophic fluctuation. On the other hand, it may, as with the rise of Christianity, signify an important ideological expression of fundamental economic and social developments.
That is what I would like to know.
If the book was written in fairly clear English, with a lucid argument that a moderately well read Irish peasant can cope with, such as with Kautsky’s translations, I would be be grateful. I could do without having to wade through a Perry Anderson level of prose only to find myself at the end none the wiser as to thrust of his thesis.
I am looking for a good work on the origins of Islam.
What I am not looking for
I don’t want a litany of the basic facts (Mohammed did this, Abu Bakr did that). I am familiar as I want to be with those.
I don’t want a recitation of why Islam is inherently backward a la Frank Gaffney and the dimmer wing of the neo-conservatives.
I don’t want a hagiographic account of Islam which spends half its time justifying Islam’s various peculiarities or one that simply treats its doctrines as if there is a reasonable chance of them being literally true.
What I am looking for
I would like a social history based on historical materialism. Something along the lines of Kautsky’s The Foundations of Christianity. Applied historical materialism if you like.
That book takes a long and broad view of the epoch, looking at everything from economic fundamentals, e.g. how the peasant economy was displaced by an aristocracy reliant on war and slave labour which in turn raised technical barriers and caused political exhaustion thereby preventing further social evolution, to how these long-term processes received ideological expression through intense social alienation and a turning away from engagement with this world in favour of salvation in the hereafter.
I am not sure if such a work is as applicable to Islam, which is pretty much a recapitulated version of Judaism and early non-Trinitarian Christianity that managed to hit the jackpot in terms of achieving an imperial level of power quite early on.
Thus its very status as a particularly successful variant of Abrahamianism may signify nothing more than that the fortunes of aristocratic empires are prone to catastrophic fluctuation. On the other hand, it may, as with the rise of Christianity, signify an important ideological expression of fundamental economic and social developments.
That is what I would like to know.
If the book was written in fairly clear English, with a lucid argument that a moderately well read Irish peasant can cope with, such as with Kautsky’s translations, I would be be grateful. I could do without having to wade through a Perry Anderson level of prose only to find myself at the end none the wiser as to thrust of his thesis.