Log in

View Full Version : exAmbassador's "contingency plan" for a political transition in Venezuela



el_chavista
19th September 2012, 14:07
Former US Ambassador to Venezuela, Patrick Duddy writes a "contingency plan" for a political transition in Venezuela


Council on foreign relations
Contingency Planning Memorandum No. 16

http://www.cfr.org/venezuela/political-unrest-venezuela/p28936

Release Date September 2012

Introduction
In the coming months, Venezuela could experience significant political unrest and violence that lead to the further curtailment of democracy in the country. Presidential elections are scheduled to take place on October 7, 2012.

Given current circumstances in Venezuela, several plausible scenarios could trigger significant political unrest that degenerates into violence:


Chavez's defeat on October 7 looks likely before the election. Street violence erupts either spontaneously or at the instigation of Chavez's allies in the government. The government declares a state of emergency and postpones the election. The suspension of civil liberties following such a declaration may last for ninety days and can be renewed. The state-controlled media would likely endorse the temporary imposition of martial law as necessary to preserve order and the revolution. Such actions, however, could precipitate widespread clashes with opposition supporters, particularly where there are military and National Guard deployments.

Chavez wins the election—or plausibly claims to win—and almost immediately dies or withdraws from public life for health reasons. A state of emergency is declared. New elections are required but also new candidates. Since none of Chavez's chief lieutenants appears to enjoy sufficient public support to assure election, cracks begin to appear in the Chavista movement that prove difficult to reconcile. It is also possible that the opposition splinters. In many respects Chavez holds the opposition together much as he does his own coalition.

The election is held and Capriles wins. Government workers and the beneficiaries of misiones riot before Capriles can be inaugurated. An apparently lame-duck Chavez declares a state of exception and postpones the inauguration. The perception that the government had manufactured a justification for setting aside a Capriles victory would lead to widespread demonstrations by Capriles supporters. An angry, resurgent opposition, convinced it was in danger of having its triumph stolen, would be vulnerable to Chavista provocation. Clashes between opposition supporters and the Chavista faithful would occur.
Capriles wins and is inaugurated. Strikes by Petroleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) oil workers paralyze oil production. Chavistas at all levels of government resist the new administration's efforts to implement its own programs and/or jettison moribund Chavista projects. Government workers are encouraged by Chavista media to see Capriles's efforts to cut the government's swollen payroll as a purge. This is particularly likely at PDVSA, the state oil company, which has doubled its workforce since the strike of 2003 even though oil production has stagnated at well below pre-strike levels. The military intervenes, and supporters of the new government take to the streets.

The election is held and the results are too close to call or are unacceptable to the government. The Electoral Tribunal delays announcing the results. Both the opposition and Chavez's supporters take to the streets. The Chavista base fears a loss while the government seeks a way to avoid acknowledging a defeat. The opposition fears a manipulated outcome. The Council of State or the somewhat vaguely constituted Anti-Coup Command denounces efforts to subvert the election or destabilize the country while Chavez or an interim president declares a state of exception. Street violence erupts and is attributed to the opposition.

Die Neue Zeit
19th September 2012, 15:05
Venezuela is long overdue for a popular-class-based managed democracy.

cynicles
20th September 2012, 00:43
OMG, why is the language in these reports, documents and leaks always so damn arrogant? If you read the wikileaks about Europe it even stuck as fuck. I wan't to strangle whatever imperially smug prick writes this shit.

KurtFF8
22nd September 2012, 15:53
OMG, why is the language in these reports, documents and leaks always so damn arrogant? If you read the wikileaks about Europe it even stuck as fuck. I wan't to strangle whatever imperially smug prick writes this shit.

Should they be more polite in their internal discussions about how best to counter forces opposed to NeoLiberalism?

Positivist
22nd September 2012, 15:58
These scenarios kinda neglect that Chavez will probably win the election organically. Calls to open up economies to foreign investment as any right opposition necessarily would, aren't exactly popular amongst the poor who have benefited under Chavez.

RadioRaheem84
22nd September 2012, 18:02
Chomsky was right, internal memos and documents regarding foreign policy seems to indicate that officials really believe the kool aid imperial logic that is supposedly propaganda.

I guess this makes our position far more beneficial when understanding international current events.

Red Commissar
25th September 2012, 17:19
State of emergency possibility seems to come up a lot- mentioned explicitly in the first two scenarios.

I love though how "Democracy" is often used as a beating stick here, right with the getgo "lead to the further curtailment of democracy in the country", which implies that there was "democracy" before Chavez to begin with. Neoliberals sure have a weird idea of democracy.

What I find more concerning is the ex-Ambassador's "playbook" for the US depending on the outcome.

"The point of instigated violence would be the creation of circumstance sufficient to justify a suspension of civil liberties, postponement of the election, or, following a vote, invalidating the results of October 7. "

Again the state of emergency scenario. This is reading like a cheesy Tom Clancy novel.

"Violent crime is allowed to surge in the major cities before the election. Irregular armed groups violently harass the opposition and/or seek to disrupt Capriles's political events."

NeoLiberals often like to accuse "authoritarian" governments of manipulating criminal elements to their benefit, so I guess this isn't surprising.

Funny thing is when it comes down to it, almost all of the scenarios when people are angry with Capriles's victory is because of agitation/manipulation by Chavez and his party, not because, you know, people don't like him.

"Weapons are distributed to the militia."

He goes on to describe a "warning" if it is seen the militias are being armed and moved around, and again claiming that they'll be activated in the case of Chavez being a sore loser essentially.

Basic food items disappear. Private businessmen are accused of hoarding and their businesses are expropriated. Stocks of staples are perpetually low at present in Venezuela because of Chavista penalties for hoarding in reaction to price controls.

Oh noes! EXPROPRIATION

Remaining independent media are closed and/or prominent journalists are detained. The independent media have been under pressure by Chavez since 2006. Most that remain are critical of the government.

Yes, "independent". How many are funded by US fun money though? How many were supporting the coup? Let's go to the next neoliberal gold,

"Democracy Promotion: The United States has worked for decades to promote democracy in the Western Hemisphere. "

:D

He also discusses actions the US could take, ranging from freezing bank accounts to interfering with CITGO operations in the US "in the event of violence or an interruption of democracy".

The only thing I can agree with here that makes sense is that there is probably a power struggle within the PSUV over who could succeed Chavez in the event he dies. Whether this explodes into spectacular violence though, I can not fetishize about like the former ambassador.

I also like this:

"Venezuela has one of the world's highest homicide rates"

Granted, this is true, but it's amusing that there is little discussion of murders in states that the US is friendly with. IIRC Honduras currently has a ridiculous murder rate, which seems to have escalated since Zelaya's removal. This has been a running theme in Venezuela news stories here in the west too though, always mentioning the crime problems and the state involvement in it.

At any rate, regarding his assertion that Chavez's re-election is unlikely, polling even in opposition places have shown him to have leads. Only a few outlets have shown leads for the other guy, which foreign outlets believe is the case.

It may be worth mentioning that Duddy was originally expelled from the US because the government accused him of being involved in a military plot to overthrow the government.

cynicles
26th September 2012, 00:46
Should they be more polite in their internal discussions about how best to counter forces opposed to NeoLiberalism?
No, they should just let me meet them for a few hours after they write it so I can curb stomp their smug ruling class asses.

Prometeo liberado
26th September 2012, 00:58
These scenarios kinda neglect that Chavez will probably win the election organically. Calls to open up economies to foreign investment as any right opposition necessarily would, aren't exactly popular amongst the poor who have benefited under Chavez.

So what you're telling me is that the Bourgeois are incapable of understanding the anything outside the narrow parameters of their own insanity? Well! I am appalled.