Log in

View Full Version : We Are Now One Year Away From Global Riots, Complex Systems Theorists Say



Hexen
11th September 2012, 09:37
We Are Now One Year Away From Global Riots, Complex Systems Theorists Say

Posted by Brian_Merchant (http://motherboard.vice.com/profiles/brian_merchant) on Monday, Sep 10, 2012


Save this post (http://motherboard.vice.com/posts/we-are-now-one-year-away-from-global-riots-complex-systems-theorists-say/save)



http://assets.motherboard.tv/post_images/assets/000/013/637/climate-riots_large.jpeg?1347299725


Add This

What’s the number one reason we riot? The plausible, justifiable motivations of trampled-upon humanfolk to fight back are many—poverty, oppression, disenfranchisement, etc—but the big one is more primal than any of the above. It’s hunger, plain and simple. If there’s a single factor that reliably sparks social unrest, it’s food becoming too scarce or too expensive. So argues a group of complex systems theorists in Cambridge, and it makes sense.
In a 2011 paper (http://arxiv.org/pdf/1108.2455v1.pdf), researchers at the Complex Systems Institute unveiled a model that accurately explained why the waves of unrest that swept the world in 2008 and 2011 crashed when they did. The number one determinant was soaring food prices. Their model identified a precise threshold for global food prices that, if breached, would lead to worldwide unrest.
The MIT Technology Review (http://www.technologyreview.com/view/425019/the-cause-of-riots-and-the-price-of-food/) explains how CSI’s model works: “The evidence comes from two sources. The first is data gathered by the United Nations that plots the price of food against time, the so-called food price index of the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN. The second is the date of riots around the world, whatever their cause.” Plot the data, and it looks like this:
http://www.viceland.com/viceblog/80453462Riots-global.jpg
Pretty simple. Black dots are the food prices, red lines are the riots. In other words, whenever the UN’s food price index, which measures the monthly change in the price of a basket of food commodities, climbs above 210, the conditions ripen for social unrest around the world. CSI doesn’t claim that any breach of 210 immediately leads to riots, obviously; just that the probability that riots will erupt grows much greater. For billions of people around the world, food comprises up to 80% of routine expenses (for rich-world people like you and I, it’s like 15%). When prices jump, people can’t afford anything else; or even food itself. And if you can’t eat—or worse, your family can’t eat—you fight.
But how accurate is the model? An anecdote the researchers outline in the report offers us an idea. They write that “on December 13, 2010, we submitted a government report analyzing the repercussions of the global financial crises, and directly identifying the risk of social unrest and political instability due to food prices.” Four days later, Mohamed Bouazizi set himself on fire to protest food prices in Tunisia. And we all know what happened after that (http://utopianist.com/2011/02/protest-gone-pop-how-we-watch-forward-remix-the-revolution/).
http://www.viceland.com/viceblog/63314903tunisia-riots.jpeg
Today, the food price index is hovering around 213, where it has stayed for months—just beyond the tip of the identified threshold. Low corn yield in the U.S., the world’s most important producer, has helped keep prices high.
“Recent droughts in the mid-western United States threaten to cause global catastrophe,” Yaneer Bar-Yam, one of the authors of the report, recently told Al Jazeera (http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/08/20128218556871733.html). “When people are unable to feed themselves and their families, widespread social disruption occurs. We are on the verge of another crisis, the third in five years, and likely to be the worst yet, capable of causing new food riots and turmoil on a par with the Arab Spring.”
Yet the cost of food hasn’t quite yet risen to the catastrophic levels reached last year. Around the time of the riots cum-revolutions, we saw the food price index soar through 220 points and even push 240. This year, we’ve pretty consistently hovered in the 210-216 range—right along the cusp of danger. But CSI expects a perilous trend in rising food prices to continue. Even before the extreme weather scrambled food prices this year, their 2011 report predicted that the next great breach would occur in August 2013, and that the risk of more worldwide rioting would follow. So, if trends hold, these complex systems theorists say we’re less than one year and counting from a fireball of global unrest.
But the reality is that such predictions are now all but impossible to make. In a world well-warmed by climate change, unpredictable, extreme weather events like the drought that has consumed 60% of the United States (http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/7/12/it-s-official-america-is-now-a-massive-natural-disaster-zone) and the record heat that has killed its cattle (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/16/us/heat-forces-ranchers-to-sell-herds-to-cut-losses.html) are now the norm. Just two years ago, heat waves in Russia crippled its grain yield and dealt a devastating blow to global food markets—the true, unheralded father of the Arab Spring was global warming, some say (http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/01/30/207426/egyptian-tunisian-riots-food-prices-extreme-weather-and-high-oil-prices/).
And it’s only going to get worse and worse and worse. Because of climate change-exacerbated disasters like these, “the average price of staple foods such as maize could more than double in the next 20 years compared with 2010 trend prices,” a new report from Oxfam (http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ib-extreme-weather-extreme-prices-05092012-en.pdf) reveals. That report details how the poor will be even more vulnerable to climate change-induced food price shocks than previously thought. After all, we’ve “loaded the climate dice,” as NASA’s James Hansen likes to say, and the chances of such disasters rolling out are greater than ever.
This all goes to say that as long as climate change continues to advance—it seems that nothing can stop that now—and we maintain a global food system perennially subject to volatile price spikes and exploitation from speculators (http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/poverty-matters/2012/aug/02/world-teetering-brink-global-food-crisis), without reform, our world will be an increasingly restive one. Hunger is coming, and so are the riots.
Follow Brian at @bcmerchant (http://www.twitter.com/bcmerchant) and Motherboard @motherboard (http://www.twitter.com/motherboard), and on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/motherboardtv).



Source: http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/9/10/we-are-now-one-year-and-counting-from-global-riots-complex-systems-theorists-say--2

Workers-Control-Over-Prod
11th September 2012, 09:49
Ha. Thanks, i've been pointing out this correlation since years and always been de ries as "economistic".

ВАЛТЕР
11th September 2012, 10:04
Sure food prices will cause upheaval, but will the upheaval be revolutionary in nature or just rioting out of frustration? Either way it goes down it is a chance for us to get our politics out there and try to direct the anger at the system as a whole. That is of course if it happens in the first place.

Jimmie Higgins
11th September 2012, 14:48
Sure food prices will cause upheaval, but will the upheaval be revolutionary in nature or just rioting out of frustration? Either way it goes down it is a chance for us to get our politics out there and try to direct the anger at the system as a whole. That is of course if it happens in the first place.

Yes it's interesting to read some information about these trends, but it's an observation that has existed for a long time. The French Revolution, for example began with food riots. But it's also a mechanical way to look at things too because while this often can lead to uprisings, there were urban rebellion in the black northern ghettos for many consecutive years in the US and they were generally sparked around issues of housing and police brutality and more general political repression (outraged responses to the killing of MLK, for example) - none had to do with food or food prices to my knowledge. The likelyhood of a riot vs. resignation also depends on a sense of the collective mood - a police shooting in the 1960s was more volatile than today because there was at least a sense of being able to fight back, whereas now the response tends to be, "Oh shit, another one!"

So essentially the inherent inequalities (in food in some places, in housing or jobs, or state attempts to manage the side-effects of these things in the form of repressive policing of the poor) of the system cause these uprisings. But, to repeat the point above, while uprisings will occur just from the pressures of the system, it doesn't automatically translate to class-organization and ability to do something about the cause of the anger.

Yuppie Grinder
11th September 2012, 14:54
How accurate of these systems theory folks been recently?

The Jay
11th September 2012, 15:19
This was a good article, but as others have said this correlation has been well known. Places such as Egypt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Egyptian_Bread_Riots) and others have even had revolts named after food shortages.

Mr. Natural
11th September 2012, 16:11
Hexen, Thanks for the thread, which gives me an opportunity to point to the bourgeois trap into which current complexity theorists have fallen. Indeed, they are turning systems-complexity theory, of which I am an enthusiastic lay philosopher, into a form of reductionism. Amadeo Brodiga is correct to be wary of the predictions these practitioners of bourgeois science make.

The big, big problem is that these scientists do not understand global capitalism as The System within which we all now live and think, and do not understand that capitalism's organizational relations are opposed to the organization of life and community. Capitalism is organized to extract a runaway, relentless profit from the communities of life. Life, on the other hand, organizes to generate a sustainable, ecological profit with which it creates and maintains its myriad communities. Life produces for community; the cancer of capitalism attacks and dismembers life's communities to manufacture an alien, malignant profit process.

Current complexity theorists are completely lost within capitalist relations. Thus, as Hexen posts, "If there's a single factor that reliably sparks social unrest, it's food becoming too scarce or too expensive. So argues a group of complex systems theorists."

Do other comrades see how reductive these ostensible complexity theorists are? Not only do they ignore the underlying system that births social complexity, they then focus on a single factor of The System: its for-profit production and maldistribution of food.

My major beef is complexity theorists' shocking ignorance of The System that now manufactures our socio-economic complexities and turns them into contradictions. Are food riots imminent? Sure. And much, much more as a senile capitalism that has reached the end of its process self-destructs. Here are some other hanging catastrophes the human species can look forward to as we are extincted or returned to a resourceless New Stone Age: incessant warfare, including use of nuclear weapons; increasing populations with decreasing resources; pandemics; climate change/chaos that includes an ozone hole and global warming; desertification; deforestation; soil depletion and salination; increasing racism and ethnic strife; pervasive chemical and other pollutions; massive police-surveillance-mass culture Orwellian states with increasing poverty and inequality.

How is it possible that the world's top systems theorists always ignore The System? Is it ignorance or political cowardice? I suspect ignorance is the major factor, but whatever the case might be, these guys and gals are systemic hacks and a distraction from The Problem.

I'm a genuine complexity theorist: I focus on the systemic, organizational relations that birth our socio-economic and natural relations, as did Marx and Engels. My red-green best.

ckaihatsu
11th September 2012, 18:38
As an example, here's a particular approach / "implementation" of complexity theory as it may apply to social history:


[1] History, Macro Micro -- Precision

http://postimage.org/image/34mjeutk4/


[22] History, Macro Micro

http://postimage.org/image/35q8b6o84/

Lynx
11th September 2012, 19:32
Only blind ideology prevents governments from using non-market mechanisms such as rationing or subsidies. These could easily reduce the odds of food riots by ensuring that everyone has enough to eat.

Workers-Control-Over-Prod
11th September 2012, 22:04
Only blind ideology prevents governments from using non-market mechanisms such as rationing or subsidies. These could easily reduce the odds of food riots by ensuring that everyone has enough to eat.

...that and billions in "contributions", yes.;)