Log in

View Full Version : Freelancers Union: a better path to a "Workers Party"



Die Neue Zeit
3rd September 2012, 21:26
All the Freelancers Union needs to do is take that final step from grassroots lobby group (political canvassing, raising money for politicians who advocate for freelancers’ rights, lobbying state governments for legislative change) to independent political party, even one inspired technologically by the Pirate "movement." Other than that, it's a better path to a "Workers Party" than any traditional "organized labour" route (i.e., a "labor" party based on the trade unions).

Right now, it has its own health insurance company and retirement plan for freelance workers, not to mention discounts on gyms and hotels, aiming to "build a new social support system that makes sense now and two generations from now."

This article is more critical, but on this next critique misses the point:

http://dissentmagazine.org/article/?article=4094


But how does one organize a workforce that is, by definition, unaffiliated? Where do you find members, if not in assembly lines or hiring halls? How do you hold your employers accountable and make yourself visible to government when you cannot strike? And isn’t a freelancers’ union, in all its individualistic self-organization, the ultimate oxymoron?

[...]

A traditional union that’s governed by the National Labor Relations Act is classified as a (C)5, which allows it to engage in collective bargaining. The FU, on the other hand, is a 501(C)4 organization, which means it is essentially a not-for-profit advocacy group.

[...]

The prospect of the Freelancers Union’s bringing about nationwide policy changes is less convincing. It is unclear how its constituents—who really could be re-named the Hipster Union—will become a political force strong enough to take on Washington and Wall Street if their so-called solidarity extends only to a small group of likeminded individualists.

Answer (not in article or the author's strike fetish): Become an independent political party (more than just stop backing Bloomberg, Obama, et al) and expand the social support system.

citizen of industry
4th September 2012, 03:16
Why can't they strike? I didn't think anti-strike laws applied to the private sector. In any case, there is always work-to-rule, slowdowns, direct actions, etc. I guess because they are registered as a non-profit advocacy group and not a labor union. I'm sure there's ways around that, like making a union and affiliating it to the parent org -same people, same office, etc.

Die Neue Zeit
4th September 2012, 04:05
It's the very nature of precarious and other freelance work that makes it difficult to strike. These people move from job to job, assignment to assignment.

citizen of industry
4th September 2012, 04:18
In Japan there is no law interfering with the individual's or minority's right to strike, as long as their union membership is declared. We do it all the time, dispatch/contract workers/etc. Obviously, a long term strike is out of the question, because you can be replaced, but we employ selective strikes- a day here, an hour here. Strike, come back, strike again in the same day, etc. Employers don't like that, and they can't fire you as long as you follow the law.

Die Neue Zeit
4th September 2012, 04:45
Yes, but again strike action for this strata is woefully ineffective compared to political action. That simply can't be used to force public policy change.

citizen of industry
4th September 2012, 04:59
Yes, but again strike action for this strata is woefully ineffective compared to political action. That simply can't be used to force public policy change.

Well, I'd say it depends on how much of the precariat is unionized. Strike has the potential
to be effective outside the limited economic struggle between and individual or minority union against their employer. But you are right in that most of the precariat is unorganized and unreceptive to building fighting unions. A lot of people see them as cheap help centers and can't get their head around the idea you have to organize your coworkers and strike.

I like how this union is building a social support system. That should definitely be a priority for unions. I don't see why it has to be divorced from direct struggle against the emoloyers though.

Die Neue Zeit
4th September 2012, 05:04
You and I have argued about the politics-economics divide before. Remember: this organization isn't legally a union proper.