Log in

View Full Version : Paul Ryan brings the philosophy of Ayn Rand to national stage



Hexen
13th August 2012, 10:56
WASHINGTON -- When Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney selected Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) as his running mate, he wasn't just picking a self-proclaimed nerd and policy wonk, he was picking Ayn Rand's latest and best literary agent.
Rand's windy, melodramatic prose has been a conservative and libertarian inspiration for decades. Her novels Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead are deemed essential philosophical tracts in defense of capitalism and the will of the individual over a society based on shared sacrifice. Rand titled one of her books "The Virtue of Selfishness."

In a recent New Yorker profile, Ryan called her a key inspiration in his life. His coming-of-age moment featured Rand.
"I grew up on Ayn Rand," Ryan told the Atlas Society, a group of Rand devotees, in a 2005 speech. "That's what I tell people ... you know, everybody does their soul-searching, and trying to find out who they are and what they believe, and you learn about yourself ... I grew up reading Ayn Rand, and it taught me quite a bit about who I am and what my value systems are, and what my beliefs are."

Ryan went on to say that Rand's works are required reading for his staff. "The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, it would be Ayn Rand," he went on to say. "And the fight we are in here, make no mistake about it, is a fight of individualism versus collectivism." Rand's works featured prominently in a 2009 Ryan video critique of President Barack Obama. The congressman said that he was not surprised that Rand's novels have spiked in popularity since Obama took office. "It's that kind of thinking, that kind of writing that is sorely needed right now," Ryan said. "And I think a lot of people would observe that we are right now living in an Ayn Rand novel, metaphorically speaking."

In April, Ryan attempted to distance himself from his prior infatuation with the novelist, telling the National Review in an interview, "If somebody is going to try to paste a person's view on epistemology to me, then give me Thomas Aquinas. Don't give me Ayn Rand." (A spokesman later suggested that Ryan was not repudiating Rand's philosophy, but that Ryan did not make staffers read Atlas Shrugged.)

Rand followers are apparently overjoyed at Romney's choice of Ryan as his vice presidential pick.
"I think the announcement is great news," Aaron Day, CEO of the Atlas Society, told Politico. "The influence of Rand on Ryan as it relates to the role and nature of government is a huge step forward for the liberty movement."

The New Yorker profile the article refers to: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/08/06/120806fa_fact_lizza?currentPage=all

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/11/paul-ryan-ayn-rand_n_1767766.html

pluckedflowers
13th August 2012, 11:04
This article (http://www.thenation.com/article/garbage-and-gravitas#), and its brilliant opener, never gets old:


St. Petersburg in revolt gave us Vladimir Nabokov, Isaiah Berlin and Ayn Rand. The first was a novelist, the second a philosopher. The third was neither but thought she was both.

Jimmie Higgins
13th August 2012, 11:06
Meh, makes sense from the Romney Campaign's POV - I expected that they'd pick someone to appeal to tea-party types though. Campaigns often use the VP position to "balance out the ticket". Obama's people pick the big-time insider to balance out fears of "inexperience". Romney doesn't excite the right because he is presented as being pragmatic and political rather than ideological - so they pick someone with an ideological rep to inoculate from the "Obamacare/Romneycare" criticisms.

ВАЛТЕР
13th August 2012, 11:07
American politics would be hilarious if they weren't so sad and terrifying.

Catma
13th August 2012, 15:21
Meh, makes sense from the Romney Campaign's POV - I expected that they'd pick someone to appeal to tea-party types though. Campaigns often use the VP position to "balance out the ticket". Obama's people pick the big-time insider to balance out fears of "inexperience". Romney doesn't excite the right because he is presented as being pragmatic and political rather than ideological - so they pick someone with an ideological rep to inoculate from the "Obamacare/Romneycare" criticisms.

Right, but this doesn't balance anything. Tea partiers have no choice but to vote for Romney. There's no need to throw them a bone. The Ryan pick gains no votes, but almost certainly loses some. I can't for the life of me see what the point is of picking him. It also seems like a personally hazardous choice for Romney to make, given the right's propensity for violence.

cynicles
13th August 2012, 16:27
This article (http://www.thenation.com/article/garbage-and-gravitas#), and its brilliant opener, never gets old:

I always knew Ayn Rand was a hack, but I didn't realize she was that big of one.

jookyle
13th August 2012, 23:05
Sometimes, people make you wish the RAF had an active American branch.

Workers-Control-Over-Prod
13th August 2012, 23:16
Hey! This is great, now Obama will definitely win. And when the economy crashes after the elections in the USA, the Americans will most likely vote for these right wing idiots and it will get even worse for working people "austerity, tax cuts" etc. The good thing about the "Libertarian" right wingers is that they openly believe liberty in capitalism should be kept only to those who were born with it, the owners, for the rich to have the freedom to exploit. This will hit the western working class hard when they realize what right wing policies do. I do not think these people will implement racist policies though to be honest, so fascists will most likely not be so popular with this "Libertarian" spaced-out idealist ruling class, "Tyrrany, no! Nazism, That's Socialism!" Blablabla... not a horrible development for revolutionaries.

Princess Luna
14th August 2012, 00:59
He pretty much took Objectivism and removed all the good parts (legalized drugs, pro-abortion, etc... ) here is the full quote from the National Review interview he did, about why he rejected Ayn Rand
“I reject her philosophy. It’s an atheist philosophy. It reduces human interactions down to mere contracts and it is antithetical to my worldview. If somebody is going to try to paste a person’s view on epistemology to me, then give me Thomas Aquinas, Don’t give me Ayn Rand,” (http://reason.com/blog/2012/08/13/vice-president-paul-ryan-would-not-be-vi) He is not a Objectivist, just a run-of-the-mill bullshit conservative.

Robespierres Neck
15th August 2012, 05:54
It's funny, Ayn Rand herself said she despised conservatism (ironic). I wonder how she'd feel knowing she's a prophet for them now.