View Full Version : Jenna Jameson endorses Romney
Blackburn
7th August 2012, 14:30
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-rt-us-jennajameson-mittromneybre8750if-20120806,0,123958.story
"I'm very looking forward to a Republican being back in office," Jameson said as she sipped champagne. "When you're rich, you want a Republican in office."
I'm sorry for posting this. For some reason it's affecting me more than it should. I'm disappointed.
I also, want the second part of the 1990s back.
Lenina Rosenweg
7th August 2012, 14:42
Well, Nina Hartley will never support Romney.
To be honest I had no idea who Jenna Jameson was until just now.
Romney did allow porn channels in the Marriott Hotel chain (a Mormon owned outfit)when he was on their board of directors, so their may be some tie in their.
ВАЛТЕР
7th August 2012, 15:54
When you're rich, you want a Republican in office.
Well she's defending her class interests. Nothing really surprising.
l'Enfermรฉ
7th August 2012, 17:18
What will Obama do without the porn stars on his side!?!?
Ostrinski
7th August 2012, 17:23
Perhaps this was a sarcastic joke
cynicles
7th August 2012, 17:33
The real concern of any true Marxist should be what Ron Jeremy's position on the matter is!
Beeth
7th August 2012, 17:34
.
Well she's defending her class interests. Nothing really surprising.
Exactly. We fight for our class interests, they fight for theirs. Nothing shocking. Moral evaluations don't work. Activism is what we need.
Bronco
7th August 2012, 18:54
Sounds like she's joking to me, don't see why anyone should care either way or what difference it makes though
NGNM85
7th August 2012, 19:17
That's disappointing, and a little surprising given that the Evangelical Right, which is, arguably, the largest, and most powerful segment of the Republican base, and which dictates their social agenda, are considerably more anti-porn than any feminist group. (Which isn't to suggest that all feminists are anti-porn, however; some, absolutely are.)
L.A.P.
7th August 2012, 23:45
I'm sorry for posting this. For some reason it's affecting me more than it should. I'm disappointed.
Obviously because you feel guilty for getting off on a reactionary
Igor
7th August 2012, 23:48
That's disappointing, and a little surprising given that the Evangelical Right, which is, arguably, the largest, and most powerful segment of the Republican base, and which dictates their social agenda, are considerably more anti-porn than any feminist group. (Which isn't to suggest that all feminists are anti-porn, however; some, absolutely are.)
In the end, Republicans are about business, not about the Bible, it's pretty important to get that. If these things ever cross wires, Jesus is fucked.
and she seemed to be joking anyways though idk tho
Lobotomy
8th August 2012, 00:12
In the end, Republicans are about business, not about the Bible, it's pretty important to get that. If these things ever cross wires, Jesus is fucked.
well of course they are, but so is every other party. Republicans definitely use religion as a tool to gain support more than any other group in the US and so it is kind of funny to see a porn star among Romney's supporters. also I appreciate when bourgeois individuals are honest about their intentions, they should get slightly less shitty living conditions in the gulags. ;)
RadioRaheem84
8th August 2012, 06:02
In the end, Republicans are about business, not about the Bible, it's pretty important to get that. If these things ever cross wires, Jesus is fucked.
and she seemed to be joking anyways though idk tho
I actually think they;re trying to kick the Christians out now.
NewLeft
8th August 2012, 06:08
who the fuck are these people
A Revolutionary Tool
8th August 2012, 06:26
When it comes to these elections zero fucks should be given about what almost anybody who is rich says imo
Jesus Saves Gretzky Scores
8th August 2012, 06:29
who the fuck are these people
Porn stars.
cynicles
8th August 2012, 06:42
When it comes to these elections zero fucks should be given about what almost anybody who is rich says imo
And how, but just to be on the safe side mayhaps we should only give -3.9585 fucks instead.
Yuppie Grinder
8th August 2012, 07:12
Who the hell is Jenna Jameson?
Edit: lol at porn stars claiming to be rich
Silvr
8th August 2012, 07:21
This is actually pretty funny. A pornstar voting for a Mormon. And it isn't a joke, by the way, which makes it even more of a joke.
.
Well she's defending her class interests. Nothing really surprising.
By casting a vote, lol? Not really, its a pretty inconsequential exercise. Its not like the Democrats defend the interests of a different class anyway.
Silvr
8th August 2012, 07:24
Who the hell is Jenna Jameson?
Edit: lol at porn stars claiming to be rich
I know, right?
#1 Jenna Jameson Net Worth $30 Million
#2 Tera Patrick Net Worth $15 Million
#3 Peter North Net Worth $10 Million
#4 Jesse Jane Net Worth $8 Million
#5 Traci Lords Net Worth $7 Million
#6 Maria Takagi Net Worth $6 Million
#7 Ron Jeremy Net Worth $5.5 Million
#8 Bree Olson Net Worth $5 Million
#9 Katie Morgan Net Worth $4.5 Million
#10 Lexington Steele Net Worth $4 Million
#11 Jenna Haze Net Worth $3.5 Million
#12 Evan Seinfeld Net Worth $3 Million
#13 Sasha Grey Net Worth $2.5 Million
#14 Gianna Michaels Net Worth $2 Million
#15 Evan Stone Net Worth $2 Million
#16 Belladonna Net Worth $1.8 Million
#17 Jayden Jaymes Net Worth $1.7 Million
#18 Audrey Bitoni Net Worth $1.6 Million
#19 Sunny Leone Net Worth $1.5 Million
#20 Tori Black Net Worth $1 Million
ยฟQue?
8th August 2012, 08:01
Let me just go out on a limb here and guess that every person who doesn't know who Jenna Jameson is has to be either younger than 25 years old or foreign.
amirite?
Os Cangaceiros
8th August 2012, 08:07
I know, right?
#1 Jenna Jameson Net Worth $30 Million
#2 Tera Patrick Net Worth $15 Million
#3 Peter North Net Worth $10 Million
#4 Jesse Jane Net Worth $8 Million
#5 Traci Lords Net Worth $7 Million
#6 Maria Takagi Net Worth $6 Million
#7 Ron Jeremy Net Worth $5.5 Million
#8 Bree Olson Net Worth $5 Million
#9 Katie Morgan Net Worth $4.5 Million
#10 Lexington Steele Net Worth $4 Million
#11 Jenna Haze Net Worth $3.5 Million
#12 Evan Seinfeld Net Worth $3 Million
#13 Sasha Grey Net Worth $2.5 Million
#14 Gianna Michaels Net Worth $2 Million
#15 Evan Stone Net Worth $2 Million
#16 Belladonna Net Worth $1.8 Million
#17 Jayden Jaymes Net Worth $1.7 Million
#18 Audrey Bitoni Net Worth $1.6 Million
#19 Sunny Leone Net Worth $1.5 Million
#20 Tori Black Net Worth $1 Million
Damn, 30 million dollars? That is legitimately "rich", IMO.
hatzel
8th August 2012, 10:53
So is this Jenna Jameson character a political commentator or something? I assume she's pretty much just an American David Dimbleby...
Sasha
8th August 2012, 11:20
In the end, Republicans are about business, not about the Bible, it's pretty important to get that. If these things ever cross wires, Jesus is fucked
Oh, but its propper hardcore Christians too, here the same lot who rather let their kids die of measles than inoculate them because of "gods will" are the first to pump their cattle full with antibiotics and vaccines.. its really disgusting and telling how fast those "principles" go out the window when money is to be made. But hey, always possible to cherrypick another bible page to make it all o.k. after all..
Yuppie Grinder
8th August 2012, 12:29
I know, right?
#1 Jenna Jameson Net Worth $30 Million
#2 Tera Patrick Net Worth $15 Million
#3 Peter North Net Worth $10 Million
#4 Jesse Jane Net Worth $8 Million
#5 Traci Lords Net Worth $7 Million
#6 Maria Takagi Net Worth $6 Million
#7 Ron Jeremy Net Worth $5.5 Million
#8 Bree Olson Net Worth $5 Million
#9 Katie Morgan Net Worth $4.5 Million
#10 Lexington Steele Net Worth $4 Million
#11 Jenna Haze Net Worth $3.5 Million
#12 Evan Seinfeld Net Worth $3 Million
#13 Sasha Grey Net Worth $2.5 Million
#14 Gianna Michaels Net Worth $2 Million
#15 Evan Stone Net Worth $2 Million
#16 Belladonna Net Worth $1.8 Million
#17 Jayden Jaymes Net Worth $1.7 Million
#18 Audrey Bitoni Net Worth $1.6 Million
#19 Sunny Leone Net Worth $1.5 Million
#20 Tori Black Net Worth $1 Million
Well sorrrrry for not being a porn expert. You'd think they wouldn't be that well payed.
Blackburn
8th August 2012, 14:41
Okay Kids,
Jenna Jameson is the most famous porn Star in the world, and the richest. Her fame exploded in the last 1990s, so I understand if the youngins don't know who she is.
Think Kim Kardasian famous back then. Basically even if you never looked at porn, you knew who she was. She was in the mainstream news so much.
Jenna Jameson (born Jenna Marie Massoli; April 9, 1974)[3][4] is an American entrepreneur and former pornographic actress, who has been called the world's most famous adult-entertainment performer[5][6][7] and "The Queen of Porn."[8] She started acting in erotic videos in 1993 after having worked as a stripper and glamour model. By 1996, she had won the "top newcomer" award from each of the three major adult movie organizations. She has since won more than 20 adult video awards, and has been inducted into both the X-Rated Critics Organization (XRCO) and Adult Video News (AVN) Halls of Fame.[9][10]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenna_Jameson
When the internet started, it was known for the porn use, and she was the number 1 porn star at the time.
She's also married to Tito Ortiz, the retired UFC Light Heavyweight champion.
No UFC fans in the house?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tito_Ortiz
Blackburn
8th August 2012, 14:44
Obviously because you feel guilty for getting off on a reactionary
Yep, I was trying to say that subtly.
:laugh:
I feel like having a long shower to wash away most of the late 1990s.
In my defence I was younger and dumber back then, and we didn't have no internet porn. Magazines and video cassettes!
Probably the first porn video cassette I purchased was of her.
Yes kids, video cassettes! LOL
NGNM85
9th August 2012, 01:38
I actually think they;re trying to kick the Christians out now.
Catholics are kinda marginalized in the Republican party, the religious right is primarily composed of Evangelicals, but if they're like Rick Santorum, and they stick to the stuff they like; gay marriage, and abortion, then they don't seem to object too much, however; the religious right remains as probably the largest, and most powerful faction of the Republican party, and it still dictates their social policy. For example; something like a thousand anti-abortion bills were introduced in the last congress, so they're still a potent force within the party.
TheCultofAbeLincoln
9th August 2012, 03:58
Has anyone else heard the joke?
Finally, someone who changes positions as often as Mitt Romney does.
hahaha
cynicles
9th August 2012, 04:10
Well sorrrrry for not being a porn expert. You'd think they wouldn't be that well payed.
Depend what kind of porn you do and who you are gay porn stars can make $8000 to $12000 a scene where as atright male pornstar might only make between $750 to $1750 a scene. Straight female porn stars have to stand out more then others but can do ok.
Goblin
9th August 2012, 04:34
I wonder what Mr Romney thinks of this.
Sasha
9th August 2012, 11:25
I wonder what Mr Romney thinks of this.
found this one quite nice;
"I like to imagine Romney being told of this endorsement. I picture him bursting into tears and running to the hotel bathroom, where sounds of ice buckets, running taps, high-pitched wailing, and the slapping of naked flesh emanate from behind the locked door for a solid three hours before Romney emerges, not a hair out of place, and nobody ever speaks of that incident ever again."
Blackburn
9th August 2012, 21:22
Depend what kind of porn you do and who you are gay porn stars can make $8000 to $12000 a scene where as atright male pornstar might only make between $750 to $1750 a scene. Straight female porn stars have to stand out more then others but can do ok.
From what I understand Ms Jameson made the bulk of her money when she on-sold her production house.
She made x amount as a star. Used that to make a start up as a pornographer herself. Then on-sold it for multi-million dollars.
So she did not just make that working as an employee, she became an owner and that's when she really catapulted into the rich list.
ed miliband
9th August 2012, 21:41
don't get why this is any more "disappointing" than her being a paid-up obama cheerleader?
of course, it isn't disappointing either way. and anyone who is diappointed, erm...
Lynx
10th August 2012, 00:22
Are they getting married? It's what Mormons do...
cynicles
10th August 2012, 01:01
From what I understand Ms Jameson made the bulk of her money when she on-sold her production house.
She made x amount as a star. Used that to make a start up as a pornographer herself. Then on-sold it for multi-million dollars.
So she did not just make that working as an employee, she became an owner and that's when she really catapulted into the rich list.
Yeah that's what I figured, that's what most of the ones who wanna get rich do. They still make substantial salaries without that however which is what I was adressing in Brodiga's post.
Eadweard Merten
12th August 2012, 14:13
As a Conservative Libertarian I am pleased to hear this.
Even people who are just porn stars can see how badly Obama and the Left in general (remember Dems. controlled Congress in 2008, 2009) have messed things up.
I might have to go and pick up some of her DVDs now... :tt1:
Radikal
18th August 2012, 20:42
As a Conservative Libertarian I am pleased to hear this.
Even people who are just porn stars can see how badly Obama and the Left in general (remember Dems. controlled Congress in 2008, 2009) have messed things up.
I might have to go and pick up some of her DVDs now... :tt1:
Why do you always say you are a Conservative Libertarian? Libertarians are a sect in the Right, so you are automatically Conservative. Anyways, I always laugh at people who think the two parties are different. Sure, they look socially different, but they work for the rich, they don't care about you, or anyone in the 99%. And these corporate pornstars are for their corporate masters, and in the case of Jenna Jameson, she is one of these rich fucks.
rylasasin
19th August 2012, 00:01
Why do you always say you are a Conservative Libertarian? Libertarians are a sect in the Right, so you are automatically Conservative.
Not Necessarily... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism)
As for the topic...
"Jenna Jameson endorses Romney"
... who? Oh. Some porn star.
ppphhht. Don't care. I prefer hentai anyway.
Trap Queen Voxxy
19th August 2012, 00:28
It has been confirmed, much to everyone's shock, Jenna is a moron.
As for the topic...
"Jenna Jameson endorses Romney"
... who? Oh. Some porn star.
ppphhht. Don't care. I prefer hentai anyway.
"Oh, some porn star"?
Even people who are just porn stars can see how badly Obama and the Left in general (remember Dems. controlled Congress in 2008, 2009) have messed things up.
Who are just pornstars? Not to nitpick but I don't understand why you're talking about sex actors as if they are somehow beneath "normal," or "average," workers because they fuck on camera for a living.
Well sorrrrry for not being a porn expert. You'd think they wouldn't be that well payed.
They're more or less like regular actors now from what I understand in terms of pay and shit.
Igor
19th August 2012, 00:33
It has been confirmed, much to everyone's shock, Jenna is a moron.
There's nothing moronic about standing up to your class interests; it's what we're all doing anyways, after all. At least Jameson is being honest about it.
Trap Queen Voxxy
19th August 2012, 00:36
There's nothing moronic about standing up to your class interests; it's what we're all doing anyways, after all. At least Jameson is being honest about it.
Despite her income I'm not entirely sure if she truly is acting within her own class' interests considering her own relation to and control over the means of production.
Zostrianos
19th August 2012, 00:39
I hope Jenna realizes that Romney wants to ban porn altogether (http://techcrunch.com/2012/07/24/could-romney-really-ban-porn/)
Igor
19th August 2012, 00:42
Despite her income I'm not entirely sure if she truly is acting within her own class' interests considering her own relation to and control over the means of production.
Jameson didn't reach that income by acting in porn films, and I'm pretty sure she isn't an active in acting anymore. Nowadays she's first and foremost a porn enterpreneur, a businesswoman, and there are really no questions about her relation to the means of production.
Trap Queen Voxxy
19th August 2012, 00:43
Jameson didn't reach that income by acting in porn films, and I'm pretty sure she isn't an active in acting anymore. Nowadays she's first and foremost a porn enterpreneur, a businesswoman, and there are really no questions about her relation to the means of production.
Hmm, well, even still, fuck her.
l'Enfermรฉ
19th August 2012, 01:04
Hmm, well, even still, fuck her.
Cheeky pun or accident? :confused:
Radikal
19th August 2012, 01:17
Not Necessarily...
Ah, I see. I didn't know. :tongue_smilie:
Everything else in my post still stands.
Trap Queen Voxxy
19th August 2012, 03:24
Cheeky pun or accident? :confused:
Def former. Also, for the record, I could act better.
Jazzratt
19th August 2012, 13:01
Just going back a bit and almost certainly going off topic:
They're more or less like regular actors now from what I understand in terms of pay and shit.
Do you know why this would be? I thought actor wages were in some way tied to the financial success of the films they star in. I was also under the impression that with free internet porn as competition the traditional porn industry was in something of a crisis? How do they maintain such high wages for the performers?
Trap Queen Voxxy
19th August 2012, 20:37
Do you know why this would be? I thought actor wages were in some way tied to the financial success of the films they star in. I was also under the impression that with free internet porn as competition the traditional porn industry was in something of a crisis? How do they maintain such high wages for the performers?
Here's my guess. I think comparing free internet porn (a lot of which is amateur) to the high end porn is like comparing Dark Knight Rises or some other major motion picture to a self-made movie on Youtube. It would be the same as any other entertainment genre, I mean, people download movies and songs illegally and the music and conventional movie industry has stayed a float. I think your wage would probably depend on the companies you work for, the movies you done, the name you've made, etc. All the usual shit with acting, you know?
Ocean Seal
19th August 2012, 20:47
.
Well she's defending her class interests. Nothing really surprising.
I'm pretty sure that this is a sarcastic endorsement. Like the John McCain Al-Qaeda type thing. Trololol
Silvr
19th August 2012, 23:05
It isn't.
Robespierres Neck
19th August 2012, 23:15
The real concern of any true Marxist should be what Ron Jeremy's position on the matter is!
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/ron-jeremy-romney-good-man/story?id=16883916
Jazzratt
20th August 2012, 02:47
Here's my guess. I think comparing free internet porn (a lot of which is amateur) to the high end porn is like comparing Dark Knight Rises or some other major motion picture to a self-made movie on Youtube. It would be the same as any other entertainment genre, I mean, people download movies and songs illegally and the music and conventional movie industry has stayed a float. I think your wage would probably depend on the companies you work for, the movies you done, the name you've made, etc. All the usual shit with acting, you know?
Yeah I see how that makes sense and obviously the industry has found some way to support those wages. Although I think porn trends can be a bit more unpredictable compared to others. Amateur porn* is now something that people actually seek out in preference to more polished (fnar, fnar) works, sometimes for highly bizarre reasons: for example it is allegedly more ethical - this despite the obvious problems, for example that it is impossible to know if all involved parties in a given video are aware and approve of its being put into a public space. Anyway this is probably offtopic so I'll leave it at that.
*At least porn that looks amateurish - quite a lot now is produced by pretty big companies who are quite happy to use deliberately low end techniques 1) to give a sense of verisimilitude to the conceit that it's truly an amateur production and 2) to keep overheads down.
Lowtech
11th September 2012, 06:00
if we cared what she thought, we wouldn't watch her sucking dick HAHAHA
but she's right ironically, you need to be one of the blood sucking elites or one of their familiars to want a republican in office.
free thinking, altruistic people highly dislike republicans and their mockery of politics
รรณẊรฎรถʼn
11th September 2012, 06:51
The name rung a bell, but I couldn't recall who she was before someone on this thread explained.
As a Conservative Libertarian I am pleased to hear this.
Even people who are just porn stars can see how badly Obama and the Left in general (remember Dems. controlled Congress in 2008, 2009) have messed things up.
I might have to go and pick up some of her DVDs now... :tt1:
If you think the current problems of the US can be attributed solely or primarily to the Democrat-controlled Congress of 08/09, then you are a fucking simpleton.
Let's just say the problem is much wider and more complex than your asinine analysis, and point to the current economic craphole situation enveloping the whole world as an indicator of that.
Althusser
8th October 2012, 03:51
Not Necessarily... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism)
There's an page for Anarcho-nationalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_nationalism). Lol wikipedia pages are jokes.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2020 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.