Log in

View Full Version : Greek workers in mining factory vote for self-management



Tim Cornelis
11th July 2012, 01:41
Not sure how true this is though:


Workers at Mining Industry factory in Northern Greece vote for factory self-management

Statement from workers at a mining industry factory in Greece announcing their decision to take over their factory under workers' self-management.

“You can’t? We can!” Workers at Mining Industry factory in Northern Greece vote for and prepare for self-management of their factory – victory to the workers!

Concerning the struggle at VIOMIHANIKI METALLEYTIKI (Mining Industry) in Thessaloniki

The administration of VIOMIHANIKI METALLEYTIKI, a subsidiary of Filkeram-Johnson, has abandoned the factory since May 2011, along with its workers. In response, the workers of the factory abstain from work (epishesi ergasias: the legal right of workers to abstain from work should their employer delay their payment) since September 2011. The Workers Union at Viomihaniki Metalleutiki has organised 40 workers all of which are, to date (one year after the closure of the factory) active, taking shifts at the factory to ensure that no equipment is removed by the administration or stolen. All the workers also participate in the General Assemblies.

The proposal of the Union in order to escape this dead end – as the Administration has stated the factory will not reopen, due to the lack of funds – is for the factory to go into workers control, a proposal voted by 98% of the workers at the General Assembly. More specifically they ask for the factory to be passed on to the workers and for all the members of the Administration and workers sitting in the administrative council to resign, with no claims from the future workers’ self-management of the factory.

In regard to the initial capital, which is necessary for the operation of the factory, the proposal of the workers is for the Greek Manpower Employment Organization (OAED) to pay them in advance the sums they are already entitled to after becoming redundant.

Finally, the workers at Viomihaniki Metalleutiki demand the introduction of legal status for co-operative enterprises, in order for their own and for future initiatives to be legally covered.

In the struggle of the workers of Viomihaniki Metalleutiki, apart from the self-evident value that we see in every workers’ struggle and every workers’ demand, we also recognise an additional value, which comprises exactly of this proposal of self-management. We believe that the occupation and the re-operation of factories and corporations by their workers is the only realistic alternative proposal in face of the ever-increasing exploitation of the working class. The self-organisation of factories that close down is the only proposal that has the force to mobilise the working class – which, living under the constant threat of unemployment, cannot see ways in which it can resist.

We know that the difficulties we shall face in the struggle for the self-management of the factory are many, since state and capital will fiercely stand against it – as a possible victory shall create a precedent and and example for any other struggle in the country. Yet the question of whose hands the production lies in becomes a question of life and death for a working class pushed into degradation. For this reason, the workers’ struggles orientated in this direction and the forces standing in solidarity to these struggles should be prepared to clash with state and the administration in order to materialise the occupation of the means of production and the workers’ self-management.

We call for every union, organisation and worker to stand in solidarity to the struggle of the workers of VIOMIHANIKI METALLEYTIKI and to actively support the workers both financially and politically.

OPEN ASSEMBLY:
Wednesday 11/7/2012,
6pm at the Labour Centre of Thessaloniki.

Movement for Workers’ Emancipation and Self-Organisation

http://libcom.org/news/workers-mining-industry-factory-northern-greece-vote-factory-self-management-10072012

(Hopefully, Omsk wont "eliminate" them for their self-organisation instead of self-subjugation to the Vanguard Party).

Ravachol
11th July 2012, 02:30
What I find more problematic is the logic of self-management. In what form do they understand this? Does it mean simply restarting the factory and going back to work, selling the products as a collective capitalist? If so, that would set an example that is not to be followed if we are to break with Capitalism. A qualitative improvement would be the formation of workers' councils in said factory and a call for solidarity and the spread of the councils throughout the sectors most immediately connected to the factory and industry, linking their struggles. Given the fact that the workers are prepared to take over the factory for self-management, such a call doesn't seem too 'far-fetched'.

Factories taken over in such a fashion would better be put to use when opened up and their resources put at the service of the spread of the struggle and the direct fulfillment of concrete needs as opposed to continuing to operate it as a place for commodity production.

Sinister Cultural Marxist
11th July 2012, 09:58
What I find more problematic is the logic of self-management. In what form do they understand this? Does it mean simply restarting the factory and going back to work, selling the products as a collective capitalist? If so, that would set an example that is not to be followed if we are to break with Capitalism. A qualitative improvement would be the formation of workers' councils in said factory and a call for solidarity and the spread of the councils throughout the sectors most immediately connected to the factory and industry, linking their struggles. Given the fact that the workers are prepared to take over the factory for self-management, such a call doesn't seem too 'far-fetched'.


Perhaps this is the case, but it is hardly practical to expect one factory which makes mining equipment to form self-sufficient worker's councils. How do they get new equipment to maintain their plant? How do they feed the workers? How do they power their production? Unless you have a society-wide revolution, its simply not practical to expect a group of workers which make a very specific type of industrial commodity to abandon Capitalism all by their lonesome. This IS an example to be followed because such self-sustaining worker's councils are only possible if multiple enterprises follow the lead. Otherwise there is no real alternative except for co-operative Capitalism, simply from the pragmatic view of maintaining livable material conditions for the workers.

This is a good first step. Without an international proletarian revolution, you are simply expecting too much to tell a small factory which makes industrial equipment to somehow sustain itself. The Russian Revolution, hardly an international revolution, still had a broader base than this when it began and even it ran into severe economic troubles. How do you expect some industrial equipment factory with a handful of employees to bring worker's councils to Greece single-handed?


Factories taken over in such a fashion would better be put to use when opened up and their resources put at the service of the spread of the struggle and the direct fulfillment of concrete needs as opposed to continuing to operate it as a place for commodity production. The concrete needs of the workers are food, water, housing, health care, electricity and education for their children. Devoid of a real revolution in these other sectors, there is no rational way to expect these workers to fulfill their concrete needs without some kind of interaction with the Capitalist system. That's the whole problem with a revolution which is not international, or at least does not have a deep economic base which can take care of the broad material demands which most people have today.

human strike
11th July 2012, 14:49
Self-management has historically been on occasions the last resort of counter-revolution in capitalist preservation. But I agree entirely with Ravachol's sentiment. Self-management for communism, not the market.

Vladimir Innit Lenin
11th July 2012, 21:12
I knew a girl from Thessaloniki once. Very much liked her. :blushing:

On topic, it seems as though this could be quashed, could become a for-profit co-operative, or a genuine workers' council. Either of the last two options would be a positive move, but establishing a genuine workers' council and calling for similar solidarity movements by workers in other factories would indicate a new, higher level of political consciousness by the Greek proletariat, which would be impressive and somewhat surprising.

Workers-Control-Over-Prod
11th July 2012, 21:17
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtTXWJyVIpE&feature=plcp