Hermes
24th June 2012, 18:53
Sorry for another obvious question, but something I'm having trouble with.
When capitalists go to seek new markets for their goods because they have a surplus, it isn't a surplus of goods that are needed by the country they're usually operating from, right? Or else they wouldn't be searching for new markets?
What I'm wondering is why it's more profitable for capitalists to operate on goods that aren't wanted/needed as opposed to those that are. Theoretically, couldn't you make more of a profit by actually producing what people need, or would the problem be that they're unable to afford it?
Sorry again for the probably obvious question.
When capitalists go to seek new markets for their goods because they have a surplus, it isn't a surplus of goods that are needed by the country they're usually operating from, right? Or else they wouldn't be searching for new markets?
What I'm wondering is why it's more profitable for capitalists to operate on goods that aren't wanted/needed as opposed to those that are. Theoretically, couldn't you make more of a profit by actually producing what people need, or would the problem be that they're unable to afford it?
Sorry again for the probably obvious question.