Nearly Half of US Would Not Vote For Atheists or Muslims

[Hexen]

While more than nine in 10 Americans would vote for a presidential candidate who is black, a woman, Catholic, Hispanic, or Jewish, significantly smaller percentages would vote for one who is an atheist (54%) or Muslim (58%). Americans' willingness to vote for a Mormon (80%) or gay or lesbian (68%) candidate falls between these two extremes.

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/evl6uzgnekoeiuja132xjw.gif

The results are based on a June 7-10 Gallup poll, updating a question Gallup first asked in 1937 in reference to a female, Jewish, or Catholic candidate and has asked periodically since then, with additional candidate characteristics added to the list. The question has taken on added relevance in recent years as a more diverse group of candidates has run for president. This year, Mitt Romney is poised to become the first Mormon to win a major-party presidential nomination. However, Americans' willingness to vote for a Mormon has changed little in 45 years.

Notwithstanding the Mormon trend, Gallup's history on this question shows growing acceptance for all other types of candidates over time. That includes atheists, whose acceptability as candidates surpassed 50% for the first time last summer but have typically ranked at the bottom of the list whenever the question has been asked.

In 1937, less than half of Americans said they would vote for a Jewish or female presidential candidate; now 90% or more would. The same applies to voting for a black candidate compared with 1958. Over time, Americans' acceptance of blacks and women as candidates has increased the most.

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/7h2m-noudeoqryyw7jv9mw.gif

Republicans, Democrats Differ Most on Gay, Muslim, Mormon Candidates

Americans of all political party affiliations are nearly unanimous in saying they would vote for a black, female, Catholic, Hispanic, or Jewish president. Democrats are significantly more likely than Republicans to say they would vote for a presidential candidate who is gay, Muslim, or an atheist. Republicans, in turn, are more likely to say they would vote for a Mormon.

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/ztel74zvk0cdjg1u0r6org.gif

Republicans' willingness to vote for a Mormon for president is higher this year, likely because their presidential candidate is of the Mormon faith. When Gallup asked the same question in February 1999, Republicans were only slightly more likely than Democrats, 81% to 75%, to say they would vote for a Mormon for president. There was a similar six-percentage-point party gap (72% Republican, 66% Democrat) in a February 2007 poll, in the early stages of the 2008 presidential campaign and Romney's first run for president.

Gallup also finds wide differences in support for various presidential candidates by age. At least seven in 10 young adults, those under age 30, would vote for a presidential candidate of any background. However, fewer than half of senior citizens would vote for a candidate who is gay, an atheist, or Muslim.

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/iojka3y8vkqmjmkd9l1row.gif

Implications

Americans over time have generally become more accepting of presidential candidates from various backgrounds. However, there are still certain types of candidates -- specifically atheists and Muslims -- that Americans would have a harder time supporting. Even so, a majority of Americans say they would vote for such candidates.

Support for a Mormon candidate has been relatively flat over time, suggesting there may be a ceiling on acceptance of presidential candidates with certain background characteristics. Even with a Mormon poised to be the nominee of a major political party, Americans' willingness to vote for a Mormon is not significantly greater now than in the past. That suggests that it may take more than simply having a prominent future candidate who is gay, Muslim, or an atheist to bring Americans' acceptance of candidates from those backgrounds up to near-unanimous levels.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/155285/Atheists-Muslims-Bias-Presidential-Candidates.aspx

What does this tell about the US?

[Comrade Samuel]

Nothing we didn't already know. :D

I would put money on it that in the next 15 or so years that these numbers will increase as more of the very old, very out of touch reactionaries die off (that's not to say the younger generation is all that great either) but this still says alot about far we have come in such a relatively short time.

[Catma]

Atheists and Muslims are above 50% !? :blink:

I'll take it!

[Obs]

Baby boomers cannot die fast enough.

[MuscularTophFan]

Gay/Lesbian - 68%

Well at least me might be able to elect the first gay president, but that doesn't make up for the 40% of Americans who are fucktards.:( Still this is an improvement. In the 2008 poll I remember support for an atheist president was at 48%. Now it's 56% which is a majority now.

[Blake's Baby]

I keep reading this as 'nearly half of us (ie, RevLefters)' not 'nearly half of U.S.'

I think nearly half of RevLefters not voting would only be a positive thing. I presume most of us wouldn't mind if we were not voting for a black, a Jew, a woman...

Is the implication of the entire poll that 'black, Jew, Mormon, Muslim, atheist...' means exclusively a male black, Jew, Mormon, Muslim, atheist... and 'woman' means 'white middle aged middle class Christian woman'? OK the 'gay/lesbian' category is pretty obviously gender-inclusive but everything else just screams 'but what sort of middle-aged middle-class guy would you vote for?'

[Prometeo liberado]

Baby boomer's cannot die fast enough.

Just give it time. In just a few years we will be their caregivers! And then!