Log in

View Full Version : Paraguay's leftist president faces impeachment



KurtFF8
22nd June 2012, 14:59
Source (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/22/us-paraguay-idUSBRE85L0PS20120622)


(Reuters) - Paraguay's Senate will decide on Friday whether to oust President Fernando Lugo in a lightning-quick impeachment trial that he has compared to a coup.

Lugo, a silver-haired former Catholic bishop who quit the church to run for the presidency, is accused of mishandling armed clashes over a land eviction that killed 17 police and peasant farmers last week.

Lawmakers in the lower house agreed in a swift, near-unanimous vote on Thursday to start the impeachment. The Senate is set to vote at 4:30 p.m. (4:30 p.m. EDT) on whether to sack the president less than a year before his term is due to end.

"This is an 'express' coup because (lawmakers) have done it in the wee hours of the night," Lugo told television station Telesur late on Thursday.

He has refused to resign, resisting pressure from church leaders, and his defense team plans to ask the Supreme Court to intervene on the grounds that the impeachment violates the constitution.

"These proceedings are unconstitutional. They don't respect due process," said one of Lugo's lawyers, Luis Samaniego.

According to the rules set out by the Senate on Thursday, Lugo will be given two hours to defend himself.

Lugo, 61, a mild-mannered leftist who speaks the Guarani Indian language, vowed to champion the needs of poor Paraguayans when he was elected four years ago, ending six decades of rule by the Colorado party.

His election raised expectations among his supporters that he would tackle rampant corruption and gaping income inequalities in the soy-exporting nation of 6 million people.

Paraguay has been plagued by political instability and is known regionally for its marijuana crops and as a hub for smuggling and money laundering.

Lugo has struggled to carry out his reform agenda, including his promise to redistribute land to peasant farmers, due to the opposition's tight grip on Congress.

If convicted on Friday on the charge of failing to fulfill his duties by allowing social conflicts to escalate, Lugo would have to leave office. Under Paraguay's constitution, an impeached leader is replaced by the vice president, who completes the term.

The next presidential election is in 2013 and Lugo's vice president, Federico Franco, who has been a fierce critic of Lugo, has been expected to run for office.

Some critics accuse Lugo of sympathizing with the peasant farmers who ambushed police officers last week when they went to enforce an eviction order on a farm in the rural northeast.

Legislators also accuse Lugo of having backed a meeting of young Socialists at a site owned by the Armed Forces and of acting meekly to fight a small, violent left-wing group called the Paraguayan People's Army, known by its Spanish initials EPP.

The impeachment trial has raised concern among South American governments, who dispatched their foreign ministers to the sleepy Paraguayan capital of Asuncion late on Thursday.

Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa warned that the UNASUR regional grouping could refuse to recognize the new government if the Senate removed Lugo from office.

"We could opt to refuse recognition for the new government or even close borders," Correa told a news conference.

The last time a Paraguayan leader was impeached was in 1999 when Raul Cubas was accused of failing to fulfill his duties following the murder of the vice president and the killing of seven protesters. Cubas resigned before a verdict was reached.

(Additional reporting by Didier Cristaldo; Writing by Helen Popper; Editing by Bill Trott)

The Upsidedown world website posted a good article on this:
http://upsidedownworld.org/main/paraguay-archives-44/3699-paraguay-there-are-more-dead-comrades


Source: Pagina/12 (http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/ultimas/index.html) According to some media sources, the police, and the landowner's association of Paraguay, a group of agents was attacked when it entered the estate of a millionaire in order to evict landless campesinos. For the campesinos, it was a slaughter.
The death of 18 people, among them 11 campesinos, occurred last Friday when police cleared, without prior dialogue, an estate occupied by landless campesinos in the northeast of Paraguay, in an area near the Brazilian border. It was a "slaughter, and we have information that there are more dead comrades in the woods¨reported the representative of a campesino organization, while the spokeswoman of another group warned of a plan to destabilize the government of President Fernando Lugo.
"What happened was a slaughter of our comrades. Many lies are being told to discredit the campesinos, who are struggling to obtain their own land to work, who are fighting for the rights given to them by land reform. I confirm that up to now, 11 comrades have been murdered," declared Damasio Quiroga, general secretary of the Paraguayan Campesino Movement, by telephone with the newspaper Página/12.
"I'm speaking to you from where the slaughter took place. We were 300 comrades of several organizations from the department of Canindeyú. We have information that there are more dead comrades, we were told there are injured, and we also knew that some being held captive were executed," recounted Quiroga.
The version of events from the media and police is that a group of agents was attacked when it entered the estate of millionaire Blas Riquelme – who was linked to, and enriched by, former dictator Alfredo Stroessner – which was being occupied by members of the Carperos Campesino Movement. [Translator's note: Carperos are landless campesinos struggling to obtain land promised to them by land reform.] The Rural Association of Paraguay adds to this tale the "certain" link between the farmworkers and the guerillas of the Paraguayan People's Army (EPP): "This fact, plus the use of automatic weapons and explosive devices, suggests something more than a simple group of landless campesinos. It was a heavily armed and organized group, capable of dealing a fatal blow to regular police forces."
It is an implausible version of the facts, given that the composition of victims so far indicates that there were more dead among rural farmworkers (11) than police (7); the latter group included two members of the Special Operations Group.
The account by campesino Quiroga differs from that offered by most of the media, the police and the landowner's association. "There is no truth to the claim that there were automatic weapons in our comrades' camp. I can tell you, comrade, that we have no connection to any guerrillas; for us, the EPP does not exist. They are inventing the story to discredit campesinos when they organize better, because we do not want to continue hoping that someday the ill-gotten lands will be given to us, we campesinos are fighting for our rights."
-- You say, "They invented the story." Who do you mean?
-- The landowners and the police; they are together in all of this. This new police chief, appointed by Lugo, is very dangerous, very corrupt, with formal complaints against him.
The National Organization of Independent Indigenous Peoples wrote in a communiqué: "The use of violence is a mechanism that state institutions like the police, military and prosecutor's office always use to protect national and transnational businessmen and big landowners, always to the benefit of the private sector."
The tension between campesinos and landowners, a sector where Brazilian soy producers predominate, has grown since Fernando Lugo became president in 2008. He had promised to move forward with land reform and resolve the problem of "ill-gotten lands," large expanses of state lands that former dictator Stroessner distributed among military officials and his followers. One such follower is the wealthy Blas Riquelme, the "Paraguayan Carlos Slim," according to the definition of Martín Almada, the leading human rights activist in the country.
A former bishop, Lugo once counted on the campesinos as his main social and electoral support. But they no longer support him as they once did.
Quiroga told this newspaper: "We have given up believing in the president; he is not keeping his promises. After this slaughter he appointed people who are corrupt and who have very bad backgrounds. The government that promised to carry out land reform is forgetting its pledge and is appointing corrupt Coloradans."
The reference is to the appointment of Rubén Candia Amarilla to the Ministry of the Interior. Candia Amarilla, a member of Stroessner's Colorado Party, promised to use a firm hand against the campesinos and announced that from now on, the evictions from occupied estates will be carried out without the establishment of dialogue with the carperos.
"Lugo had to take a step back and accept people from the Colorado Party. It was an imposition by the more reactionary groups, leaving a sector of the campesinos dissatisfied with the president; this is true. And at the same time there are other campesinos who still have confidence in him and support him, albeit as a lesser evil, because if he falls now without completing his mandate, which ends in 2013, it will be a victory for conservative forces," said Martín Almada, who believes that a plan to destabilize Lugo is in progress.
The clash provoked a political tsunami in Paraguay, with unforeseen repercussions to come over the fate of the first government without links to the Stroessner regime since the end of the dictatorship. "The situation remains red-hot here; the Right is very involved in all of this," said Magui Balbuena, of the National Committee for the Recovery of Ill-Gotten Lands.
A communiqué from that committee stated: "The slaughter in the department of Camindeyú was the result of a historic class conflict in Paraguayan society, the product of the support of the three branches of state, of a system of accumulation and hoarding of land in the hands of a few… The violence will continue if we do not initiate, once and for all, the return of lands belonging to the Paraguayan people that today are in the hands of persons not subject to land reform."

MustCrushCapitalism
22nd June 2012, 15:05
I haven't heard much about Correa or Lugo. My knowledge of Latin American left-wing leaders doesn't really extend beyond Hugo Chavez, the Castros, Evo Morales... best of luck to Lugo in this whole affair, though.

Lynx
22nd June 2012, 15:54
The attitude of the vice president makes this suspicious.

Positivist
22nd June 2012, 16:03
South America seems to exist constantly in a revolutionary situation, and every attempt at revolution or meaningful reform is thwarted by some group of reactionaries or another.

¿Que?
22nd June 2012, 16:36
I don't want to imply conspiracy theories or anything, but I have some questions. Has the US commented on any of this? Could this be part of a larger move by the US and Latin American right to destabilize all of the "pink tide" left reformers?

Sinister Cultural Marxist
22nd June 2012, 17:19
What's funny is that by many accounts, including those of some of the people quoted in these articles, Lugo has not been able to do much "revolutionary" at all, though he's been unable to do much since the senate and lower house are overwhelmingly dominated by rightists. It goes to show, often when a leader is a committed moral reformist, to the left he's an idealist, a parliamentarian, a failure, and worst of all a "bourgeois socialist" but to the right he's still just another fucking dirty commie. I hope the Campesinos have luck in their struggle, but I also hope the fucking rightwing doesn't gain a monopoly over the State again.

I wonder if Leftist states in Latin America would benefit from an intervention clause to intervene on behalf of the people in the place of a military coup. Venezuela, Honduras, and now Paraguay ... a coup (military or constitutional) is statistically speaking still the single biggest threat to a Latin American leftist government. It would probably, as much as anything else, give leaders more wiggle-room to be radical.

pastradamus
22nd June 2012, 17:58
Thats the Bishop isn't? He seems like a decent leader.

Prometeo liberado
22nd June 2012, 20:15
South America seems to exist constantly in a revolutionary situation, and every attempt at revolution or meaningful rdformnis thwarted by some group of reactionaries or another.

You needn't look to far north to find the cause for, or seeds of these reactionaries. Uncle Sam is a lot like Where's Waldo down there.

Ismail
23rd June 2012, 00:39
From the BBC:

Paraguay's Senate has voted to impeach left-wing President Fernando Lugo, forcing him to step down.

Both houses of Congress had voted on Thursday to begin impeachment proceedings over his handling of clashes between farmers and police last week in which at least 17 people died.

Mr Lugo likened the move to a coup by the right wing-controlled parliament, but said he would accept the decision.

Vice-President Federico Franco has already been sworn in as president.

He will serve the remainder of Mr Lugo's five-year term, which ends in August 2013.

After previously trying to get the Supreme Court to stop the impeachment vote, the fallen president said he accepted "what the law has stated, even though the law was twisted".

REDSOX
24th June 2012, 22:50
This is a coup by the old colorado and blancoist establishment which has been denounced by governments in the americas as well as numerous social movements. Paraguay has been suspended from the Mercosur trading bloc and numerous governments have withdrawn their ambassadors including Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Venezuela, Cuba and more besides. Hugo chavez has suspended oil shipments to paraguay. More action will probably follow as this coup will not stand

wsg1991
25th June 2012, 01:34
Chavez and Correa are against this , this gives you an idea about the nature of this coup d'etat

ckaihatsu
26th June 2012, 01:47
PARAGUAY: Down with the Coup! -- Statement by the O Trabalho Current of the Workers Party of Brazil (June 23, 2012) [ILC]

DOWN WITH THE COUP!

We support the people of Paraguay

The Paraguayan Senate yesterday [June 22] completed a coup d'etat in deposing the elected president, Fernando Lugo, during a 32-hour farce of a "constitutional trial."

Only nine months away from the next elections, the formal accusations against Lugo -- allowing demonstrations by the army's youth, subjecting the military to the "carperos" (landless workers), doing little to fight armed groups in the countryside and, as well, "bad performance" -- confirm the social content of his ouster. In fact, the episode that led to the deaths of 11 "carperos" and six policemen was only a pretext.

It was rather a coup by the landowning oligarchy with support from U.S. imperialism. It was right that the Brazilian government, as well as the Workers' Party (PT) and the Confederation of Workers (CUT), denounced the coup.

Yesterday, a few hours after the coup, the spokesman for the U.S. State Department declared, "The United States recognizes the senate vote for 'impeachment'" and cynically asked the people to remain "calm." The Paraguayan bishops even demanded Lugo's resignation!

Despite the arrival of a dozen chancellors from the UNASUR countries (Union of South American Nations), led by the Brazilian "patriot" minister, to "mediate the conflict," the United States recognized Federico Franco, the vice president of the Liberal Party. Franco, elected by the same electoral alliance as Lugo (which defeated the Colorado Party that had governed the country for decades), is now the instrument of both parties, which united to carry out the coup.

Nevertheless, Lugo was victimized by his own policy of "colligation" (or coalition) with the oligarchs and employers, delivering his office without calling on the resistance of the thousands who waited in Congress Square. For the people, the coup means the installation of a government openly hostile to their demands -- that of beginning the agrarian reform that Lugo had not yet carried out.

A WARNING TO THE BRAZILIAN PEOPLE AND ALL OF LATIN AMERICA

WARNING: In 2009, a coup in Honduras deposed democratically elected President Manuel Zelaya. It was initially condemned by the governments in the region, but later, under pressure from the United States, it was accepted by the OAS (Organization of American States).

WARNING: The Brazilian government of Dilma Rousseff has not yet recognized the new government, as is the case with other governments (*).

WARNING: When peoples confirm their will to recover their sovereignty and to control their national riches with agrarian reform and nationalizations, they only can count on their own forces to bring to fruition their social and national aspirations.

Today, June 23, the streets of the capital city of Asuncion are deserted, the buses aren't running, businesses are closed and classes have been suspended. Yesterday, 10,000 protesters in the plaza near Congress Square, who had been brought together by CUT-Auténtica (among other organizations), decided, before breaking up, to form the Front for the Defense of Democracy. The front, composed of organizations of farmers, unions, students and the "homeless" will organize the resistance, including general strikes and land occupations.

ALL SUPPORT FOR THE FIGHT OF THE PARAGUAYAN PEOPLE AGAINST THE COUP!
Sao Paulo, Brazil -- June 23, 2012 @ 3 p.m.

Executive Committee of the O Trabalho current of the Workers Party (PT)

- - -
(*) In a note from the Ministry of External Relations - known as Itamaraty - the Brazilian government that night condemned the dismissal and recalled its ambassador to Paraguay.

Ismail
26th June 2012, 03:50
From the BBC once more:

Fernando Lugo, the deposed Paraguayan president, says he is aiming to return to power, rallying allies at home and abroad to force congress to reverse a vote to remove him that he called a break with democracy.

Lugo. 61, has created a parallel cabinet, attacking the legitimacy of the government that replaced him, and says he will plead his case on the international stage at this week's summit of the Mercosur, South America’s biggest trading bloc, in Mendoza, Argentina.

He also called on domestic backers, who so far have been relatively quiet, to turn up the pressure.

“I want to resist until we regain power because here there was a parliamentary coup,'' Lugo said on Monday.

“I call on people from the countryside, the youth and all citizens to resist until we are back in the office we unfairly had to leave.''

Meanwhile, aides to Lugo's former vice-president, Federico Franco, who took the oath of office on Friday after politicians overwhelmingly voted to impeach his boss, has sworn in a new cabinet, most of whose members were drawn from Paraguay's traditional Liberal and Colorado parties.

Die Neue Zeit
26th June 2012, 14:29
What's funny is that by many accounts, including those of some of the people quoted in these articles, Lugo has not been able to do much "revolutionary" at all, though he's been unable to do much since the senate and lower house are overwhelmingly dominated by rightists. It goes to show, often when a leader is a committed moral reformist, to the left he's an idealist, a parliamentarian, a failure, and worst of all a "bourgeois socialist" but to the right he's still just another fucking dirty commie. I hope the Campesinos have luck in their struggle, but I also hope the fucking rightwing doesn't gain a monopoly over the State again.

Lugo hasn't been able to do much "reformist" at all, either. Among other things, Paraguay's presidency doesn't have:

1) Peru's exclusively executive ability to deal with legislature-defeated bills and vetoed bills, like those dealing with questions on war and peace, by holding referenda;
2) Brazil's and Chile's exclusive legislative initiative (reserved for the executive) in policy areas beyond just budget law and international trade affairs;
3) Ecuador's ability to force legislatures to explicitly vote down, within 30 days or so, bills submitted by the executive that have also been declared “urgent” (otherwise that bill automatically becomes law); or
4) Colombia's ability to declare "economic emergency" for direct monetary and fiscal intervention against, say, a US-style budget crisis initiated by a relatively stubborn legislature (a la Gingrich).