Log in

View Full Version : Anarcho-Fascism?



ВАЛТЕР
4th June 2012, 21:12
What the fuck is this shit? lol

Please tell me that this isn't real. These people can't possibly exist.

http://www.facebook.com/anarchistfascism


Anarcho-Fascism description:


Anarcho-fascism (also used interchangeably with the terms libertarian fascism, fascist anarchy, corporatist libertarianism and stateless fascism) is a radical, right-wing, anti-statist political and economic ideology. Rather than embracing a contradictory or antagonistic set of ideas, anarcho-fascists claim to synthesise the desirable elements of both fascism and anarchism to produce a syncretic anarchist tendency beyond "both left and right". Anarcho-fascists have cited inspiration from figures such as Georges Sorel, the Strasser brothers and Ernst Jünger as well as historical movements such as the Blueshirts in the Spanish civil war.
Anarcho-fascists, rooted in the theory of neotribalism, seek to establish autonomous societies that have seceded from the state and have organised along the basis of a shared "national identity" (which adherents voluntarily define and agree upon amongst themselves). Much like national anarchists, anarcho-fascists argue that the nation-state does not constitute the nation itself and rather it is defined by the natural cultural homogeneity shared between individuals. The preservation and protection of a nation's "identity" from external influences (or ideologies such as liberalism, conservatism, social democracy and Marxism) is held as a central tenet and duty of anarcho-fascists. Failure to do so would be seen as leading to gradual degeneration and eventual weakness of the nation.
Adopting neither capitalism or socialism, anarcho-fascism promotes a "third way" position where private businesses and worker cooperatives coexist alongside each other. Disputes would be collectively managed and resolved through a body or council that determines what would be in the collective interests of the nation as a whole. Some have pointed out that this resembles a corporatist economic model, and many anarcho-fascists also label themselves as "corporatist libertarians" or "anarcho-corporativists". Anarcho-fascists also believe that labour must be mixed with the land in order to make their claim to "territory" legitimate.
Anarcho-fascists argue that, unlike classical fascism, an authoritarian leader is not needed to lead a nation and that many will voluntarily act of their own volition. However some anarcho-fascists, looking to keep the more recognisable traditions of fascism, may choose to have a "leader" with purely symbolic value much in the same way anarcho-monarchists do. They stress that self-discipline, physical fitness and uniformity are important in maintaining the overall strength of the nation. Anarcho-fascists celebrate political violence, war and militarism when used in conjunction against the state. It is believed this will not only weaken the state but "..awaken the warrior instinct within man, rejuvenate his primal spirit, passion and courage". This is seen as essential in order to flush out the "weak" elements of their society. Anarcho-fascist nations may also choose to engage in a friendly conflict between themselves if it is desired and agreed upon between both parties.

:laugh:

Deicide
4th June 2012, 22:14
Anarcho-fascism is a political philosophy which believes that an anarchic society, in the absence of publicly recognized government or enforced political authority, can and should be brought about through a harsh authoritarian state. It is believed that since the people cannot be trusted to come to this freedom on their own, it must be imposed on them by the state. They support a situation of complete social, political and economic equality between all citizens, presided over by a rich ruling class. Anarcho-Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy, yet are against any type of such organization on the grounds that it is undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful.

Trap Queen Voxxy
5th June 2012, 04:08
In a nutshell: crust punks whom beat off to Hitler and Mussolini.

Magón
5th June 2012, 04:19
"Anarcho-fascists, rooted in the theory of neotribalism..."

What the fuck is Zerzan getting himself into now?

Sounds like just another cluster fuck of idiocy and who knows what else.

Drosophila
5th June 2012, 04:48
Anarcho-Stalinism!

Luc
5th June 2012, 20:33
this is a symbol of a real group:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dLqkrp53BGg/SUOBCUF8zkI/AAAAAAAAARE/NJNqQPb1d4U/s320/Swastika+Anarcho.jpg

PC LOAD LETTER
5th June 2012, 20:36
this is a symbol of a real group:

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_dLqkrp53BGg/SUOBCUF8zkI/AAAAAAAAARE/NJNqQPb1d4U/s320/Swastika+Anarcho.jpg
anarcho-hinduism?

Luc
5th June 2012, 20:36
anarcho-hinduism?

i wish :(

jookyle
9th June 2012, 17:08
I think what's funnier is their use of the term, "anarcho-monarchist" :laugh:

Red Future
10th June 2012, 19:20
I think what's funnier is their use of the term, "anarcho-monarchist" :laugh:

I am sure a previous thread decided that that was the appropriate ideology of J.R.R Tolkein.:laugh:

Positivist
10th June 2012, 21:16
I've come across anarcho-fascism as a joke on uncyclopedia, which is where deicide's description comes from, but this sounds a little different. While the description of the system provided on your post is not obviously contradictory, and it is conceivable that people would subscribe to such an ideology, but the casual reference of anarcho-monarchists (which I can say with a fair amount of confidence don't exist) really discredits the entire thing as a joke. Furthermore, if they're confined to a facebook existence, than they wouldn't be too threatening.

ВАЛТЕР
10th June 2012, 21:34
...the casual reference of anarcho-monarchists (which I can say with a fair amount of confidence don't exist)

Think again...

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Anarcho-Monarchism/104888329589637

dun dun duuuunnnnn

Luc
10th June 2012, 21:36
Think again...

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Anarcho-Monarchism/104888329589637

dun dun duuuunnnnn

lol 88 likes ;)

StalinFanboy
23rd June 2012, 22:56
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism

there was a small national-anarchist presence in the bay for a while.

Rafiq
24th June 2012, 03:43
I am sure a previous thread decided that that was the appropriate ideology of J.R.R Tolkein.:laugh:

"Feudal Socialist" is what he used to describe himself. Christ, I fucking hate Tolkein, his reactionary shit isn't hard to spot in his so called masterpiece (LOTR) as social conservativism, national chauvinism and incestuous ethnic nationalism (And no, not incestuous in the sense of two family members fucking) bleed through.

The Fighting_Crusnik
24th June 2012, 03:50
Essentially, couldn't once just say that this is fascist oligarchy? I mean that's how it comes off to me... rather than one central fuck to boss around everyone, you got a posse of *****es to chase your ass around...

StalinFanboy
24th June 2012, 08:21
"Feudal Socialist" is what he used to describe himself. Christ, I fucking hate Tolkein, his reactionary shit isn't hard to spot in his so called masterpiece (LOTR) as social conservativism, national chauvinism and incestuous ethnic nationalism (And no, not incestuous in the sense of two family members fucking) bleed through.
too bad its a fucking excellent series of books.

Rafiq
24th June 2012, 16:37
too bad its a fucking excellent series of books.

nope

TheRedAnarchist23
24th June 2012, 17:45
nope

Because LotR is burgoeis crap right?

Magón
24th June 2012, 22:12
I liked the movies, but could never get into the books. Fantasy with Elves, Dwarfs, etc. just isn't something I can read and be entertained like other fiction genres.

Rafiq
25th June 2012, 16:27
Because LotR is burgoeis crap right?

Yeah, just like everything you've ever posted.

Ostrinski
26th June 2012, 01:42
You laugh now, just wait

StalinFanboy
29th June 2012, 20:28
nope
It must realllllly suck to be so wrong so often in life.