Valdyr
16th May 2012, 03:45
Hello, I'm in a debate with someone, and the subject of the kolkhozt and sovkozy in soviet agriculture has come up. I was under the impression that the productivity per acre of the sovkhozy were higher because the state absorbed the risks, rather than the peasants shouldering it. However, he is claiming that while the kolkhozy accounted for only 3% of the land, they accounted for 20% of the agricultural output.
I'd never heard these numbers before, and he cited Collective farming in Russia: A political study of the soviet kolkhoz by Roy Laird in support of his numbers. I confess I'd never even heard of this book; my sources were primarily the work of R.W. Davies and his crew. Is anybody familiar with this, and can anyone attest to the veracity (or lack thereof) of my opponent's numbers, and if they are valid, their relevance to the productivity debate? Thanks in advance.
EDIT: Perhaps this belongs in history, I wasn't quite sure
I'd never heard these numbers before, and he cited Collective farming in Russia: A political study of the soviet kolkhoz by Roy Laird in support of his numbers. I confess I'd never even heard of this book; my sources were primarily the work of R.W. Davies and his crew. Is anybody familiar with this, and can anyone attest to the veracity (or lack thereof) of my opponent's numbers, and if they are valid, their relevance to the productivity debate? Thanks in advance.
EDIT: Perhaps this belongs in history, I wasn't quite sure