Log in

View Full Version : Capitalism tells Women to marry Rich/Wealthy Men this is one reason as to why we shou


tradeunionsupporter
15th May 2012, 07:27
Capitalism tells Women to marry Rich/Wealthy Men this is one reason as to why we should hate Capitalism/ the Rich/Wealthy Capitalists. Capitalism promotes the idea that every Man and Woman's dream to get Rich/Wealthy. Under Socialism Marxism and Communism in a Classless Society with Equality Men and Women won't desire each other based on how much money/wealth/income they have. I understand from Darwin/Darwinism/Evolution as to why many Women desire Wealthy Men and would choose a Rich Man over a Poor Man or a Middle Class Man or a Working Class Man. In other words Capitalism teaches Men and Women to desire each other based on Wealth not Love or Good Looks do you agree with me and or this post below from the Soviet Empire Forum thank you this is just my opinion and or view you don't to agree with me. My questionis do you think it is natural for Women to desire Rich/Wealthy Men and Men desire Women for their Beauty and Looks and for Sex ?

ilistis (http://www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=9752)

27 Apr 2007, 08:44


Of course it was banned... The why is very simple. The women and the men weren't sexually depressed, like we are in the west. Sex was just a simple act like everything else that consern the needs of a body... Women had the same right in sex like the men... So the major party of the citizens had their sexual needs pleased, so there was no need for porn...
In west, like everything else, sex is part of a competion, the price of the man who is "successful"... If you have large wallet you can have all the sex everyday everyhour... If you belong in the middlelow class, the sex is something rare and boring (only with your wife, and at the most you may have also 2-3 girlfriends). So your needs are not fullfilled. So you need porn for it... That's why in the western society porn is so much spread...

http://www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/viewtopic.php?t=41694

Men seek beauty, women want wealth


By Roger Highfield, Science Editor
6:10PM BST 03 Sep 2007

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1561991/Men-seek-beauty-women-want-wealth.html

Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who Wants to Marry a Multi-Millionaire? is a Fox network (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Fox_Broadcasting_Company) reality show (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Reality_television) in which multi-millionaire Rick Rockwell asked Darva Conger to marry him. The show was aired as a single two-hour broadcast on February 15, 2000, and was hosted by Jay Thomas (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Jay_Thomas).

In 2002 TV Guide (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/TV_Guide) ranked it number 25 on its TV Guide's 50 Worst TV Shows of All Time list.[1] (http://www.revleft.com/vb/#cite_note-0)

Premise

In the show, 50 women (one from each U.S. state (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/U.S._state)) competed in a contest similar to a beauty pageant (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/Beauty_pageant) to be the bride of an unknown multi-millionaire who was revealed to be Rick Rockwell, whom they did not see except in silhouette. He selected Darva Conger of California (http://www.revleft.com/wiki/California) and married her on the spot. In addition, Conger also received a three-carat (600-mg) diamond ring and more than $100,000 in prizes. More than 22 million people viewed the show that evening.[2] (http://www.revleft.com/vb/#cite_note-people-1)[3] (http://www.revleft.com/vb/#cite_note-ring-2)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Wants_to_Marry_a_Multi-Millionaire%3F
tradeunionsupporter
15th May 2012, 07:30
Please share your opinions views or facts thank you.
l'Enfermé
15th May 2012, 10:14
Soviet Empire forum....
The Hong Se Sun
16th May 2012, 01:46
Well I think this is something more built on a want for security. People want to be safe and being rich is one way to make sure that you and your family wont go hungry. Thus a woman (or man) marries for money to ensure safety from horrible things. It is also in most bourgeois minded societies a thing about status. Not only does the person marry for security but also for social status and class.
Conscript
16th May 2012, 04:27
Soviet Empire forum....

that's bad...how?
Ocean Seal
16th May 2012, 04:47
I don't hate capitalism for abstract reasons, I hate capitalism because it creates the material conditions around me and they're shitty. I despise capitalism because of the limitations that it imbues upon me and upon others, and because I understand the scientific contradictions which plague capitalism. Not because of their commodifaction of everything.
Os Cangaceiros
16th May 2012, 08:49
So the major party of the citizens had their sexual needs pleased, so there was no need for porn...
In west, like everything else, sex is part of a competion, the price of the man who is "successful"... If you have large wallet you can have all the sex everyday everyhour... If you belong in the middlelow class, the sex is something rare and boring (only with your wife, and at the most you may have also 2-3 girlfriends). So your needs are not fullfilled. So you need porn for it... That's why in the western society porn is so much spread...

hahahahahahahahaha

*he*he*....whew!

*snicker**giggle*

ahahahahahahahahaha
Crux
16th May 2012, 10:09
Seems like somebody is rationalizing their own behaviour....
Sperm-Doll Setsuna
16th May 2012, 13:21
that's bad...how?

Stupidest forum around associated with the left, or some such. Can't think of a worse place, at least. Not that I know many... but it's basically a brain-dead Red Alert-fanboy tankie shitfest where you have politically illiterates who think the Soviet's were "pretty rad" spend their time masturbating to pictures of T-34 and PPSh and doing their little SSSR role playing games...

How is that place not bad? It's like MRN. Ridiculous and embarrassing.
Conscript
16th May 2012, 16:18
Stupidest forum around associated with the left, or some such. Can't think of a worse place, at least. Not that I know many... but it's basically a brain-dead Red Alert-fanboy tankie shitfest where you have politically illiterates who think the Soviet's were "pretty rad" spend their time masturbating to pictures of T-34 and PPSh and doing their little SSSR role playing games...

How is that place not bad? It's like MRN. Ridiculous and embarrassing.

Hmm, you've obviously never been there. Did you just read the name and go from there?

I for one haven't seen any 'tankie shitfests', probably because nobody there gives a fuck about it, same with 'roleplay' (did you just make this up?). There are no military discussions and the off topic subforum is the most active, and only like half the membership could be considered m-l, let alone 'tankie'. Sound familiar?

I could understand dislike for places like ******** and socialist *******, but your whole post was pretty unfounded.

But here, have a thanks, because if revleft is good for one thing it's bandwagons.
Ocean Seal
16th May 2012, 16:24
Stupidest forum around associated with the left, or some such. Can't think of a worse place, at least. Not that I know many... but it's basically a brain-dead Red Alert-fanboy tankie shitfest where you have politically illiterates who think the Soviet's were "pretty rad" spend their time masturbating to pictures of T-34 and PPSh and doing their little SSSR role playing games...

How is that place not bad? It's like MRN. Ridiculous and embarrassing.
There are some good posters on Soviet Empire though, a lot of them aren't tankies. Though I can still never get over why the fuck they would call their forum Soviet Empire and expect to be taken seriously.
Sperm-Doll Setsuna
16th May 2012, 16:37
There are some good posters on Soviet Empire though, a lot of them aren't tankies. Though I can still never get over why the fuck they would call their forum Soviet Empire and expect to be taken seriously.

The last time I read that forum was back in the days of that crazy fuck Int_00h. It was pretty horrible. Him and some other disgusting "National bolshevik" from Quebec, I remember. Those were truly terrible times.
Conscript
16th May 2012, 16:44
Now I know where you're coming from, takayuki. Thankfully that stupid fuck was banned and is now just a lulzy story. But still, his opinions weren't commonplace.


There are some good posters on Soviet Empire though, a lot of them aren't tankies. Though I can still never get over why the fuck they would call their forum Soviet Empire and expect to be taken seriously.

It wasn't made by a leftist and was originally a game forum for, ironically, CNC red alert in 2002 or so. It's a sister forum for politicsforum.
Sperm-Doll Setsuna
16th May 2012, 16:49
It's a sister forum for politicsforum.

Speaking of awful forums... That's one of those places that shows us what awfulness a general all-politics forum gives. :laugh:
Conscript
16th May 2012, 16:58
Speaking of awful forums... That's one of those places that shows us what awfulness a general all-politics forum gives. :laugh:

This x1000

That place got invaded by right wingers, I'm surprised how many fascists there are, and the libertarians are just annoyingly stupid.

When I saw the 'race war about to reignite....bring it on!' thread I had a sudden urge to bash a fash's face in. Soooo many scumbags there. It's no surprise there's more rightwingers posting in communist threads than actual communists.