USA kills innocent people

[ComradeRobertRiley]

The US military is still hunting for terrorists in Afghanistan
US forces in Afghanistan have admitted bombing a house near the city of Ghazni, in which at least eight people, including three children, were killed.
Afghan sources say that the Americans had intelligence that Taleban fighters were preparing an attack from a house.

But when the house was bombed, it was an Afghan family which was killed.


All I can say is shows how good the US "intelligence" is

BBC News - USA kill innocent children (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3297575.stm)

[Loknar]

Right, Maoists in Peru kill innocent children, no problem right?? But when the US does it, 'warcrminals'.

[ComradeRobertRiley]

Im not a moaist, i never, now or in the past have condoned any action by C. Mao.

Im just informing people about whats going on. Also to those on here who think the US is some sort of golden bollox country and that say George W Bush has never been responsible for innocents deaths (which they have said on here before).

I dont like your tone Loknar

[Bolshevika]

Originally posted by [email protected] 6 2003, 09:36 PM
Right, Maoists in Peru kill innocent children, no problem right?? But when the US does it, 'warcrminals'.
The U.S. forced itself upon Afghanistan, what is happening in Peru is a revolution. When an imperialist kills innocent people it is totally unnecessary, hence a war crime, when children get in the middle of gunfire in a revolution it is an accidental tragedy.

[ComradeRobertRiley]

the US in this instance deliberately blew the house up.


Theres no excuse for that. If there "intelligance" let them down then its still entirely their fault, this instance is clear cut murder.

[Loknar]

Originally posted by Bolshevika+Dec 6 2003, 09:45 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Bolshevika @ Dec 6 2003, 09:45 PM)
[email protected] 6 2003, 09:36 PM
Right, Maoists in Peru kill innocent children, no problem right?? But when the US does it, &#39;warcrminals&#39;.
The U.S. forced itself upon Afghanistan, what is happening in Peru is a revolution. When an imperialist kills innocent people it is totally unnecessary, hence a war crime, when children get in the middle of gunfire in a revolution it is an accidental tragedy. [/b]


No, Afghanistan forced it self upon us by harboring AL-Queda,. We offered them a chance: either you hand over Osama, or we will take him and destroy your government.


The laws of war only do so much to protect innocence. If they are killed by accident it is not a war crime. A war crime would be purposefully targeting civilians.


I suggest you read about the Maoists in Peru and what they do to innocent people. They are bandits, not revolutionaries.

[ComradeRobertRiley]

Why you ignore my post Loknar?

[Loknar]

Which one do you want me to adress?

[ComradeRobertRiley]

Im not a moaist, i never, now or in the past have condoned any action by C. Mao.

Im just informing people about whats going on. Also to those on here who think the US is some sort of golden bollox country and that say George W Bush has never been responsible for innocents deaths (which they have said on here before).

+


the US in this instance deliberately blew the house up.


Theres no excuse for that. If there "intelligance" let them down then its still entirely their fault, this instance is clear cut murder.

[Bolshevika]

No, Afghanistan forced it self upon us by harboring AL-Queda,. We offered them a chance: either you hand over Osama, or we will take him and destroy your government.

What a simplified view of the conflict. I don&#39;t know if you are worth debating if you actually believe that bs.

Secondly, let&#39;s say your Bin Laden was really there, why don&#39;t you have him now? Because you did not invade Afghanistan to "fight terror" you invaded to allow free opium trade (worth billions of dollars) in an attempt to try and stimulate the failing economy.


I suggest you read about the Maoists in Peru and what they do to innocent people. They are bandits, not revolutionaries

I have, and they are nowhere near as bad the as Yankee terrorist soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. They are revolutionaries because they want the overthrow of the government (Peru was under a one party state until recently) and stop the exploitation of indians in Peru by foreigners.

Personally, I don&#39;t count American businessmen/government agents/supporters in Peru and Colombia as innocent people (those are the ones they hold hostage and beat). It comes with the job, they want to oppress the peoples of peru and colombia with capitalism, they pay the price.

[@[email protected]@]

Support&#33; Supports enthusiastically&#33; Do not attempt the person which and Lian Diyou all cannot distinguish clearly to speak the truth. Some people if think oneself infallible are left wing, he must make up revolutionary the required course.

[LuZhiming]

No, Afghanistan forced it self upon us by harboring AL-Queda,. We offered them a chance: either you hand over Osama, or we will take him and destroy your government.

:lol: The U.S. ordered the Taliban to capture Osama bin Laden and send him to the U.S., and they asked for proof. The U.S. never offered any, and instead accused Taliban of harboring Osama bin Laden. I doubt the U.S. would openly hand someone over to another country if that country said, "he is a terrorist," so why should the Taliban have to? And besides, the U.S. has a long history of harboring terrorists in Miami, so the reasoning is completely hypocritical.

[ComradeRobertRiley]

I agree LuZhiming

[John_Wayne]

The US Army has never killed anyone. Enemy troops put women and children in harms way. They do it to discredit American forces.

These reports are just propoganda written by a bunch of journalists out of San Francisco. That crowd that includes Sean Penn and the Dixie Chicks. The US Army&#39;s mission is to kill the enemy. Wether it be the Taliban, Osama Ben Laden, Republican Guards, or Viet Cong. Anyone that is threatening freedom and the American way of life.

[canikickit]

The US Army has never killed anyone.

Unfortunately they&#39;re better at their jobs than that.

[Pete]

Originally posted by [email protected] 7 2003, 07:46 PM
The US Army has never killed anyone. Enemy troops put women and children in harms way. They do it to discredit American forces.

These reports are just propoganda written by a bunch of journalists out of San Francisco. That crowd that includes Sean Penn and the Dixie Chicks. The US Army&#39;s mission is to kill the enemy. Wether it be the Taliban, Osama Ben Laden, Republican Guards, or Viet Cong. Anyone that is threatening freedom and the American way of life.
I remember reading a US report about how many civilians where killed in the bombing of Iraq. From Washington. Wierd eh?

[ComradeRobertRiley]

USA admits killing children you prick.

US &#39;sorry&#39;

Patches of dried blood and a pitiful pile of children&#39;s hats and shoes are the only evidence that remains of a bombing raid that went dreadfully wrong, our correspondent says.

Seven boys, two girls and a 25-year-old man were killed when two A-10 American planes fired rockets and bullets into a group of villagers sitting under the shade of a tree at about 1030 local time (0600 GMT) on Saturday, he says.

BBC News - USA kills children (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3298945.stm)

[ComradeRobertRiley]

The same report (click the link in the above post) says:

BOMBING ERRORS*

Dec 2001: 65 killed in bombing of convoy of tribal elders
April 2002: Four Canadian soldiers killed
July 2002: 48 killed when bomb hits wedding party
April 2003: 11 killed by bomb in village of Shkin
Dec 2003: Nine children killed by bomb near Ghazni
*Mistakes accepted by US





I emphasis ACCEPTED BY US

[ComradeRobertRiley]

More Afghan children die in raids

The US military in Afghanistan has revealed that six children died in a raid on suspected militants in the eastern province of Paktia last week.
News of the deaths came shortly after the US apologised for killing nine children in a separate raid in the neighbouring province of Ghazni.


BBC News - US kills more Afghani children (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3305837.stm)

[RedAnarchist]

The US dont care who is in the way just as long as they get what they want. I bet that Bush would kill his own parents just to get oil etc etc.