Log in

View Full Version : Getting Paid 93 Cents a Day in America? Corporations Bring Back the 19th Century



Klaatu
21st April 2012, 03:46
Getting Paid 93 Cents a Day in America? Corporations Bring Back the 19th Century
Nearly a million prisoners are working in call centers, working in slaughterhouses, or manufacturing textiles while getting paid somewhere between 93 cents and $4.73.
April 19, 2012 |

TomDispatch.com / By Steve Fraser and Joshua B. Freeman

Sweatshop labor is back with a vengeance. It can be found across broad stretches of the American economy and around the world. Penitentiaries have become a niche market for such work. The privatization of prisons in recent years has meant the creation of a small army of workers too coerced and right-less to complain.

Prisoners, whose ranks increasingly consist of those for whom the legitimate economy has found no use, now make up a virtual brigade within the reserve army of the unemployed whose ranks have ballooned along with the U.S. incarceration rate. The Corrections Corporation of America and G4S (formerly Wackenhut), two prison privatizers, sell inmate labor at subminimum wages to Fortune 500 corporations like Chevron, Bank of America, AT&T, and IBM.

These companies can, in most states, lease factories in prisons or prisoners to work on the outside. All told, nearly a million prisoners are now making office furniture, working in call centers, fabricating body armor, taking hotel reservations, working in slaughterhouses, or manufacturing textiles, shoes, and clothing, while getting paid somewhere between 93 cents and $4.73 per day.

Rarely can you find workers so pliable, easy to control, stripped of political rights, and subject to martial discipline at the first sign of recalcitrance -- unless, that is, you traveled back to the nineteenth century when convict labor was commonplace nationwide. Indeed, a sentence of “confinement at hard labor” was then the essence of the American penal system. More than that, it was one vital way the United States became a modern industrial capitalist economy -- at a moment, eerily like our own, when the mechanisms of capital accumulation were in crisis.

A Yankee Invention

What some historians call “the long Depression” of the nineteenth century, which lasted from the mid-1870s through the mid-1890s, was marked by frequent panics and slumps, mass bankruptcies, deflation, and self-destructive competition among businesses designed to depress costs, especially labor costs. So, too, we are living through a twenty-first century age of panics and austerity with similar pressures to shrink the social wage.

Convict labor has been and once again is an appealing way for business to address these dilemmas. Penal servitude now strikes us as a barbaric throwback to some long-lost moment that preceded the industrial revolution, but in that we’re wrong. From its first appearance in this country, it has been associated with modern capitalist industry and large-scale agriculture.

And that is only the first of many misconceptions about this peculiar institution. Infamous for the brutality with which prison laborers were once treated, indelibly linked in popular memory (and popular culture) with images of the black chain gang in the American South, it is usually assumed to be a Southern invention. So apparently atavistic, it seems to fit naturally with the retrograde nature of Southern life and labor, its economic and cultural underdevelopment, its racial caste system, and its desperate attachment to the “lost cause.”

As it happens, penal servitude -- the leasing out of prisoners to private enterprise, either within prison walls or in outside workshops, factories, and fields -- was originally known as a “Yankee invention.”

First used at Auburn prison in New York State in the 1820s, the system spread widely and quickly throughout the North, the Midwest, and later the West. It developed alongside state-run prison workshops that produced goods for the public sector and sometimes the open market. article continues here:
http://www.alternet.org/rights/155061/getting_paid_93_cents_a_day_in_america_corporation s_bring_back_the_19th_century/

NewLeft
21st April 2012, 03:52
We can connect the private prisons to the immigration bills, the closure of public schools for juvenile detention centers, cutting of successful rehabilitation programs..

It is about class and we should make that clear, it is not because of a few corporations.

Grenzer
21st April 2012, 09:32
Can't say I'm really surprised. Some of the changes we've been saying do indeed remind me of the late 19th century; except that this time, the bourgeois states don't really have the resources to fall back on social-democracy again. It could be an isolated incidence, but I have a feeling that things like this will start to become more common.

Klaatu
21st April 2012, 22:30
A prisoner's wages are as good as anyone else's wages. Sure they are incarcerated, but that is to rehabilitate them, not a reason to exploit them. I say a prisoner has a right to earn at least minimum wage, and his earnings can be deposited into a bank account, so that he may get a good start when he has completed his sentence. Far too many parolees return to crime, due to the fact that they are right back in the poverty conditions which led them to crime in the first place.

Let's help the prisoner, not destroy his life further. Let them be paid fair wages.

Ocean Seal
21st April 2012, 22:39
A prisoner's wages are as good as anyone else's wages. Sure they are incarcerated, but that is to rehabilitate them, not a reason to exploit them.

They are not incarcerated to be rehabilitated but to be exploited.



Let's help the prisoner, not destroy his life further. Let them be paid fair wages.
No such thing.

Pretty Flaco
21st April 2012, 22:50
No such thing.

well there's certainly a difference between being paid 93 cents and 7.25.

Ocean Seal
21st April 2012, 22:59
well there's certainly a difference between being paid 93 cents and 7.25.
Yes, but they are both shitty wages to get, especially compared to what we actually should be getting for our contribution.So fuck that, fight against all prisons, regardless of how "kind and liberal" they come out to be.

Stadtsmasher
22nd April 2012, 01:15
How much can people take?

Sadly, I think America still has a long way to go before people truly wake up to exploitation. The human will put up with a lot.

Klaatu
22nd April 2012, 02:18
They are not incarcerated to be rehabilitated but to be exploited.

That's society's opinion, but I hope not your's (or other Leftists.)

Die Neue Zeit
22nd April 2012, 02:29
A prisoner's wages are as good as anyone else's wages. Sure they are incarcerated, but that is to rehabilitate them, not a reason to exploit them. I say a prisoner has a right to earn at least minimum wage, and his earnings can be deposited into a bank account, so that he may get a good start when he has completed his sentence. Far too many parolees return to crime, due to the fact that they are right back in the poverty conditions which led them to crime in the first place.

Let's help the prisoner, not destroy his life further. Let them be paid fair wages.

Most prisoners here deserve at least unionization rights for their efforts, and such deserves a living wage, not a paltry subsistence "minimum" wage.


Some of the changes we've been saying do indeed remind me of the late 19th century; except that this time, the bourgeois states don't really have the resources to fall back on social-democracy again.

Are you sure, comrade? I hope that's not a slippery slope down to catastrophism/apocalyptic predestinationism and such.

Grenzer
22nd April 2012, 03:04
I hope that's not a slippery slope down to catastrophism/apocalyptic predestinationism and such.

No, not at all. Capital can and will find a new escape route, as it has always done. I'm just saying that it won't be social-democracy this time.

If anything, this is serious cause for concern as we are starting to see some conditions that are similar to the late 19th century, but unlike those times, the worker's moment is pitifully weak, and has seen only microscopic gains when we should be dramatically gaining in popularity right now. And if anything, this makes our task all the more imperative considering whatever form capital will take, I can be fairly certain that it won't be as 'friendly' as social-democracy.

What I find ironic is that the strike fetishists look at the weakness of the left, and somehow take it as evidence that parties will not be important; when in reality the weakness of parties which is reflected in the weakness of the left indicates the opposite.

So the question becomes: are parties weak because the left is weak; or is the left weak because parties are? I have every reason to believe that it is the latter.

Proteus
22nd April 2012, 04:07
I say release them and let them form an iron column.

Sam_b
22nd April 2012, 04:32
That's society's opinion, but I hope not your's (or other Leftists.)

I don't want to be insulting, but do you actually think before posting such garbage?

Die Neue Zeit
22nd April 2012, 08:02
No, not at all. Capital can and will find a new escape route, as it has always done. I'm just saying that it won't be social-democracy this time.

If anything, this is serious cause for concern as we are starting to see some conditions that are similar to the late 19th century, but unlike those times, the worker's moment is pitifully weak, and has seen only microscopic gains when we should be dramatically gaining in popularity right now. And if anything, this makes our task all the more imperative considering whatever form capital will take, I can be fairly certain that it won't be as 'friendly' as social-democracy.

Indeed, that Weekly Worker article on Keynes and protectionism was quite poignant.

Anarcho-Brocialist
22nd April 2012, 08:06
I've heard about this in a Michael Moore film. It also showed how an Airline company outsourced to a prison system. But can anyone be surprised? Capitalism has always exploited the oppressed.

Left Leanings
22nd April 2012, 08:14
Inmates in the UK have to work in prison, and get paid peanuts for doing it. Usually it's cleaning the communal areas, or on the 'servery' (dispensing food in the canteen).

I don't know if prisoners actually work on the outside or not. But some big mouthed Tory MP, has recently called for inmates, to be part of chaingangs that dig up motorways and such.

And yep. Things are pretty bleak stateside at the moment.

Klaatu
23rd April 2012, 02:58
I don't want to be insulting, but do you actually think before posting such garbage?

(A) Maybe he was being facetious...I thought of that...but maybe he was actually serious? I do not know the poster.
Hello! some people really do believe that prisoners should be allowed to be molested and exploited.

Do you not know of a recent US Supreme Court decision which allows prison guards to strip/cavity search prisoners at will?
That being said, I think it is totally inappropriate to make jokes (if that was the poster's intent) about vulnerable prisoners
who are at the mercy of an overwhelming state power.

Supreme Court Upholds Inmate Strip Searches Regardless of Charges
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june12/scotus_04-02.html

(B) If you don't want to be insulting, then don't be.