Touching a woman

[Elysian]

It's wrong to touch a woman inappropriately. We all get that. But what if a guy asks for her permission - and she consents - and then starts touching her? Would it be wrong because he is treating her as a sex object? Or will it be right because she's given him permission (and so what he's doing isn't against her will)?

[The Young Pioneer]

God I love touching women...

And as a woman, I love being touched.



So, I don't think it's disrespectful to her or anything, so long as she wants it. Respecting her wishes is what makes it okay. Some people, regardless of gender, even get into the whole "being treated as a sex object" thing. Keyword consent, comrade.

[Vyacheslav Brolotov]

But what if she feels pressured to say ok, even though you are not pressuring her. Then what? A simple solution might be getting to know that person's personality beforehand so you can decide if she is being pressured, either by a desire to keep you around or because of society, into allowing you to touch her. People can say ok, but that does not always mean that they are really ok with an action. Yet, it all depends on the person, situation, and circumstances.

[Ostrinski]

jesus christ what the fuck is this shit

edit: I think the reason we have so many sex threads on revleft is because of all the sexually frustrated young male feminists who think anything sexual = bad

[Ostrinski]

Though I must say it is hard to uncommodify sex in bourgeois society. Just as feudal society turned sex into something that represented sanctity, capitalist society turned sex into something that like everything else is only thought of in terms of exchange.

Many times it can be hard to see sex for what it really is: horny people fucking. Under the thick of veil of its relationship to society, all it is is a basic human communication method

[Althusser]

This is fucking ridiculous... Are you kidding? "oohh how about if she lets me? can i touch her then?? ohh would it be disrespectful??:laugh:

I don't normally do this but.... c'mon

EDIT: I just realized that the OP is that calvinist-turned-atheist mega-troll Elysian

[roy]

Elysian is right. As good Marxists, we must resist the urge to procreate and maintain at least a 5m radius between ourselves at all times.

[00001]

And as a woman, I love being touched.

Don't be ridiculous. As everyone on revleft knows, women have no sexual agency. They are merely the helpless, if occasionally willing (obviously only because of societal pressure), victims of male sexuality.

[dodger]

It's wrong to touch a woman inappropriately. We all get that. But what if a guy asks for her permission - and she consents - and then starts touching her? Would it be wrong because he is treating her as a sex object? Or will it be right because she's given him permission (and so what he's doing isn't against her will)?

It's degrading dirty disgusting deplorable



That why most people like it

Are you bereft of any common sense Elysian? Do you ever talk or listen to women? Have a chin wag.... have ...no just get to know more girls. They love ,are only to willing, to put a fella straight.

[brigadista]

relax...:):)

[Deicide]

It's only allowed if you do it in the woods, under a tree, while covered in a blanket.

[The Young Pioneer]

Don't be ridiculous. As everyone on revleft knows, women have no sexual agency. They are merely the helpless, if occasionally willing (obviously only because of societal pressure), victims of male sexuality.

Ah, silly me, what was I thinking?

That was just my inadequate female brain at work again!

Darned societal pressure making me a lesbian with urges!

[Thug Lessons]

Hey OP, have you ever heard the saying, "Touch fuzzy, get dizzy"? I've got my eye on you.

[Le Rouge]

I never ask to touch a woman..I never will..Women doesn't ask too.
This thread is fucked up.

[Brosa Luxemburg]

...is fun to do.

Oh, sorry I was responding to the unfinished sentence of the title of this thread.

EDIT: Of course it is not sexist if it is consensual.

[Nox]

Anythings fine as long as consent is given

[Pretty Flaco]

Consent is always the result of sexist societal pressures and thus any male-female sexual contact should be considered rape and condemned by leftists as counter revolutionary reformism.

[dodger]

Consent is always the result of sexist societal pressures and thus any male-female sexual contact should be considered rape and condemned by leftists as counter revolutionary reformism.




I Luv it when you talk political with me!!




********************

[Ostrinski]

Consent is always the result of sexist societal pressures and thus any male-female sexual contact should be considered rape and condemned by leftists as counter revolutionary reformism.Sadly some people really believe this.

[A Revolutionary Tool]

Lol wtf? Please define inappropriate. My grandmother thinks it's inappropriate to kiss a girl in public, whether it's consensual or not. And you know how awkward that could be to ask if you could touch somebody, kiss them, etc? "Hey can I kiss you?" can ruin the whole mood, trust me I've done that before. I think it's just better to make a move, but make it very apparent what you're doing so he/she can react by either consenting or not consenting. And obviously you don't go straight for the boobs/ass/whatever you're hoping it goes towards. No, you start off by holding her hand or putting your hand on her leg or something and see her reaction. Then maybe slowly go in for a kiss, slowly moving your hands along her body towards whatever place you intend to end up, etc.

[DrStrangelove]

Holy shit people on revleft really need to fuck more. The more threads like this that appear, the more I think that revleft is populated by socially awkward, sexually repressed, teenage men.

[roy]

Holy shit people on revleft really need to fuck more. The more threads like this that appear, the more I think that revleft is populated by socially awkward, sexually repressed, teenage men.

I think you may have something...

[Agent Ducky]

Holy shit people on revleft really need to fuck more.
No thanks.


revleft is populated by socially awkward, sexually repressed, teenage men.
Well... It kind of is. :blink: This is why I would be hesitant if all of Revleft gathered in one convention/event thing. SO MANY AWKWARD GUYS.

[dodger]

No thanks.


Well... It kind of is. :blink: This is why I would be hesitant if all of Revleft gathered in one convention/event thing. SO MANY AWKWARD GUYS.



Well Agent Ducky. Hhhi! Yyou're a D-d-duck and I'm aagh a Da-Drake.

Get the Picture!!???

(overheard conversation at 1st Revleft convention)

[honest john's firing squad]

The more threads like this that appear, the more I think that revleft is populated by socially awkward, sexually repressed, teenage men.
I thought this was already a well-established fact.

[eyeheartlenin]

Elysian is right. As good Marxists, we must resist the urge to procreate and maintain at least a 5m radius between ourselves at all times.

But surely that does not apply when one is in the company, exclusively, of one's own sex! (Since the comrades' concern has to do with procreation)! As soon as I saved this message, I took a look at the title of my latest blog entry and realized that the comrade's suggested 5m radius (which is really pretty funny) sounds a little like Catholic concern about extra-marital sex, and that thought cracked me up. :)

As a matter of fact, when I saw the title of this thread, what came instantly to mind was the New Testament injunction, "It is better for a man not to touch a woman," which, of course, needs to be amended somewhat, since following that injunction would mean the extinction of our race.

[A Revolutionary Tool]

No thanks.


Well... It kind of is. :blink: This is why I would be hesitant if all of Revleft gathered in one convention/event thing. SO MANY AWKWARD GUYS.
There would be like 3 women there and a whole crowd of men asking "Could I please touch you" lol!

[hatzel]

As a matter of fact, when I saw the title of this thread, what came instantly to mind was the New Testament injunction, "It is better for a man not to touch a woman," which, of course, needs to be amended somewhat, since following that injunction would mean the extinction of our race.

You mean an amendment like:


Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband. Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.(For those you don't know your Bible inside-out, that's the two very next verses...)

[Ostrinski]

State orgies after revolution whos down

[Trap Queen Voxxy]

State orgies after revolution whos down

Let's all take off our clothes and get real weird with it.

[hatzel]

Let's all take off our clothes and get real weird with it.

But...if we take off our uniforms...how will people know we're commies...?

[roy]

^ hammer & sickle on left ass cheek

[Vyacheslav Brolotov]

State orgies after revolution whos down

I'll go revive Stalin and Trotsky.

[OnlyCommunistYouKnow]

The biggest question is why not touching a man. Men can be treated like a sex object too.

[Ostrinski]

The biggest question is why not touching a man. Men can be treated like a sex object too.Manic.. is that you?

[gorillafuck]

touching women is a core tenet of class struggle

[hatzel]

touching women is a core tenet of class struggle

I assume by 'class' you mean a school class. By which you must mean that touching women is the greatest struggle of one's schooldays but after that somehow becomes less central an issue...

[Pretty Flaco]

Sadly some people really believe this.

Who said that I don't?

[Brosip Tito]

Why the fuck wouldn't you ask? Why?

It's only treating her as a sexual object, IF YOUR TREATING HER AS A SEXUAL OBJECT. I ask my girlfriend for sex, because I just so happen to want to have sex more often than she does. The difference between asking in an objectifying way and in a "Im randy, lets shag" way, I don't get mad or upset when she says "no", life goes on the same as if I didn't ask.

What if I was single, and it was just a girl I met, or know? I would still ask, cause girls like sex too, and guess what? Still not mad if she says no.

Do you just touch first, ask later? Cause that's assault brotha.

This thread is fucking absurd.

[Trap Queen Voxxy]

I have it on good authority that roughly 100% of women are carriers of the cootie virus or Cootie Hemorrhagic Fever (CHF) and spread their defilement and sickness wherever they go and touch. The Soviets experimented with this disease in the 80s in an attempt to weaponize it and many a monkey suffered. It's better to just stay away.

[teflon_john]

hey all y'all can do whatever you want to me jus sayin'

[mo7amEd]

Lol wtf? Please define inappropriate. My grandmother thinks it's inappropriate to kiss a girl in public, whether it's consensual or not. And you know how awkward that could be to ask if you could touch somebody, kiss them, etc? "Hey can I kiss you?" can ruin the whole mood, trust me I've done that before. I think it's just better to make a move, but make it very apparent what you're doing so he/she can react by either consenting or not consenting. And obviously you don't go straight for the boobs/ass/whatever you're hoping it goes towards. No, you start off by holding her hand or putting your hand on her leg or something and see her reaction. Then maybe slowly go in for a kiss, slowly moving your hands along her body towards whatever place you intend to end up, etc.

Hahahah I fucking love this thread... this guy is ACTUALLY explaining the whole process... and how to do it in an appropriate way.

And the tags for this thread is "touching" and "woman" ...

[RGacky3]

Sometimes I get the notion that certain posters don't actually live in the real world, or have almos no contact with it, who the hell asks this type of question?

[The Douche]

This thread is a fucking trainwreck.

Closed.