Is communist unity based upon evolution or synthesis?

[hashem]

this article was published in Ranjbar, organ of Ranjbaran party of Iran. its about Bob avakians “new synthesis” theory which CPI(MLM) has also accepted. its more than a year old, but its instructive.

http://www.ranjbaran.org/01_english/?page_id=116

[Prometeo liberado]

I can't link on to the article from the computer I'm on. Having said that if any argument starts with "its about Bob avakians “new synthesis” theory" then you're already starting off on the wrong foot. First question you should ask yourself is what in the hell does this New Synthesis mean? By the time you are done figuring that out you'll end up kicking yourself in the head for wasting all that time. Jibberish, thats all it is.

[l'Enfermé]

Please, not Bob Avakian! Bob Avakian is a nut that promotes a cult of personality around Bob Avakain, and is quite open about it.

Also; Ranjbar is a Stalinist-Maoist party that split off from Tudeh in '79. If anyone is wondering.

[hashem]

Please, not Bob Avakian! Bob Avakian is a nut that promotes a cult of personality around Bob Avakain, and is quite open about it.

Also; Ranjbar is a Stalinist-Maoist party that split off from Tudeh in '79. If anyone is wondering.

this article criticizes Bob Avakians theory.

you dont know much about the party which you claim is Stalinist-Maoist.
its Ranjbaran party not Ranjbar. Ranjbar is a newspaper which is its organ. the party didnt "split off from Tudeh in '79", revolutionary elements of Tudeh party splited during 1964-65. some of them organized in Revolutionary Organization of Tudeh party of iran. the organization merged with several other groups and founded the present Ranjbaran party in 1979.

its not Stalinist either.