Websites and e-mail addresses

[Amal]

Comrades,
Me, on behalf of my organization, a public sector workers organization of West Bengal, India, hereby requesting others to give me web and/or e-mail addresses of struggling public sector trade union organizations worldwide. Especially, those which are known for their militant struggles. We need them for contacting them.

[Prometeo liberado]

Reach out to the IWW? Arguably the most militant union in the US.

[¿Que?]

Can you provide a link and maybe some background info? I have some contacts with my state union, but I'd like to know what this is about first. Also, they're not all that militant, afaik.

[Q]

Yes, background info would be helpful.

[milkmiku]

Especially, those which are known for their militant struggles. We need them for contacting them.


No, never should such an organization have a website. Use freenet or some other darknet application. Are you a honeypot?

[Q]

No, never should such an organization have a website. Use freenet or some other darknet application. Are you a honeypot?

I know of no labour organisation using freenet.

Maybe in China though? Not sure. Freenet is a resource hog anyway. Use I2P (http://www.i2p2.de/).

[Amal]

Kindly don't just mention the name, also mention the web address (if any) or e-mail. If it's problematical to announce it on open, kindly send that as personal message to me.
Actually, I am looking for e-mail addresses of organizations of Greece, Spain and other countries, where militant struggle is underway.

[milkmiku]

Freenet is a resource hog anyway. Use I2P.

I2p is good faster and less resource hogging yes, but freenet has a data store built in which allows content to remain even if the original provider ceased to be. Both are great but freenet is arguably better and has a larger network.

I primarily use freenet buy when ever I need to torrent something securely I use i2p because of the faster transfer speed and low latency.

More people should use both either way.

[Q]

I2p is good faster and less resource hogging yes, but freenet has a data store built in which allows content to remain even if the original provider ceased to be. Both are great but freenet is arguably better and has a larger network.

I primarily use freenet buy when ever I need to torrent something securely I use i2p because of the faster transfer speed and low latency.

More people should use both either way.

Last time I checked the number of users, a few months back, i2p had significantly more users and many more developers. I sincerely doubt this has changed over these last few months. But if it has, all the better of course. I agree that the concept of a distributed peer-to-peer darknet is certainly better in terms of anti-censorship.

Someone should really just reimplement the protocol in C or C++, instead of using Java. I've never really dived into why this huge overhead exists on freenet particularly (i2p is also in java), so this is more of a guess.

Also, there is an Anonymous usergroup (http://www.revleft.com/vb/group.php?groupid=726) here on Revleft (to not further derail this).