America and The World

[Saint-Just]

America is pursuing a path of world domination. Its targets are countries with political instability (some are targets for another important reason) since they are most vulnerable. This is a list of politically unstable countries and countries that will likely be targets. The numbers indicate how likely the country is to start a military conflict externally or internally and thus enter the sights of the American military-industrial elite. X is the highest. American involvement could be military involvement, military aid, high levels of political influence or CIA involvement.

Afghanistan - at war with
Algeria - civil unrest, 1
Armenia - civil unrest, 1
Burma (Myanmar) - civil unrest, 1
Burundi - civil unrest, 1
Central African Republic - civil unrest, 1
China - communists!
Colombia - drug country, geurrilla movement X
Congo-Kinshasa - civil unrest, 1
Cuba - communists!
Georgia - you know the situation
Haiti - civil turmoil, 2
Indonesia - civil unrest, 2
Iran - involved in war
Iraq - at war with
Israel, the West Bank and Gaza - prolonging internal war
Ivory Coast - internal conflict, 1
Kazakhstan - possible? 2
Kyrgyz Republic - that place.. 2
Laos - socialists, 1
Lebanon - 1
Liberia - civil unrest, 2
Libya - civil unrest, 2
Nepal - communists, 2
Nigeria - has oil, 1
North Korea - WWIII, X
Pakistan - semi-war, 5
Peru - sendero luminoso, 1
Philippines - civil unrest, 1
South Africa - civil unrest, 1
South Korea - ... X
Sri Lanka - undeveloping, 1
Sudan - 3rd world, 2
Swaziland - undeveloping, 1
Syria - middle east conflict, 2
Tajikistan - undeveloping, 1
Turkmenistan - undeveloping, 5
Uganda - 3rd world, 1
Uruguay - undeveloping, 1
Uzbekistan - undeveloping, 5
Venezuela - CIA involvement? X
Vietnam - communists!, previous war, 1
Yemen - civil unrest, 2
Zambia - cease fired with neighbour, 1
Zimbabwe - internal conflict, 1 already CIA involvement

[cubist]

the bush administration must not survive it is a threat to all,
why is it that there is this huge resentment toward bush and the U.S world wide but no one of a political status is trying to defend against him

[ComradeRobertRiley]

id love a new english prime minister and for him to say oi bush we aint your pussy no more, so fuck off

[cubist]

that would be great but unlikely as we don't want a righty primeminister

[AryaN BLitZKrieG]

Can you convey your reasoning behind labeling Iran as being already "Involved in war" ?

:ph34r:

[flayer2]

I think Belarus in on the future hit list. The demonisation of Lukashenko has been going on a while. Even now there is talk about him being the next Slobodan Milosevic.

[Saint-Just]

Originally posted by AryaN [email protected] 24 2003, 09:43 PM
Can you convey your reasoning behind labeling Iran as being already "Involved in war" ?

:ph34r:
They were/are fighting the Americans in Iraq. Not quite the same as a full scale war, but the Americans are calling it war and it means America is very likely to be putting more pressure in Iran. You are right it is slightly misleading.

It depends on what the benefits of getting involved in Belarus are, but may be they seek to influence the country in the future.

[toastedmonkey]

Whilst Bush was in Britain last week, Cheeny went to Belgium (i think), where he was supposed to make america and europe closer, but instead he talked about Irans Nuclear program, complaining of course.

they'll be next

[flayer2]

It depends on what the benefits of getting involved in Belarus are, but may be they seek to influence the country in the future.

Well its one of the last anti western bastions in Europe. They are trying to gain influence by propagation and finacing the opposition but Lukashenko has taken control of the airwaves. Belarus will however make for a tough military fight..