Log in

View Full Version : Anonymous destroys law firm involved in Haditha trial



Princess Luna
7th February 2012, 05:56
The bombs keep dropping from Anonymous—first local cops, then the FBI, and now the Marine Corps: sensitive documents from 2005's Haditha Killings trial. Anon doesn't think the Marine in charge should have gotten off so lightly. This is their payback.
Seven years ago, (then Sergeant) Frank Wuterich and several other marines he commanded killed 24 Iraqi citizens in Haditha, Iraq, in an apparent act of revenge for an unrelated IED strike. Despite admitting to the killings, Wuterich just last week officially got off with only a charge of "negligent dereliction of duty." No jail time, no serious conviction whatsoever.

Now the law firm that defended Wuterich, Puckett and Faraj has been hit with Anonymous long internet arm of "justice." Their site has been hijacked, and a giant 3 GB trove of personal information pertaining to the case (and other matters) busted wide open by Anon:

We went ahead and fired off some shots of our own - at the servers and personal email accounts of Puckett & Faraj. We defaced their website and dumped nearly 3GB of private email messages belonging to Neal Puckett and Haytham Faraj. The contents of these email messages include detailed records, transcripts, testimony, trial evidence, and legal defense donation records pertaining to not only Frank Wuterich but also many other marines they have represented.

And to add a few layers of icing to this delicious caek, we got the usual boatloads of embarrassing personal information. How do you think the world will react when they find out Neal Puckett and his marine buddies have been making crude jokes about the incident where marines have been caught on video pissing
on dead bodies in Afghanistan? Or that he regularly corresponds with and receives funding from former marine Don Greenlaw who runs the racist blog http://snooper.wordpress.com? We believe it is time to release all of their private information and court evidence to the world and conduct a People's trial of our own.

Anonymous draws an immediate comparison to Bradley Manning, the soldier behind the Wikileaks Cablegate bonanza whose trial has been a pretty far cry from transparent—about as opaque as brig walls.

Bradley Manning who was brave enough to risk his life and freedom to expose the truth about government corruption is threatened with life imprisonment.

When justice cannot be found within the the confines of their crooked court systems, we must seek revenge on the streets and on the internet - and dealing out swift retaliation is something we are particularily good at. Worry not comrades, it's time to deliver some epic ownage.

Unable to do anything about the Manning case, Anonymous will have to hope "epic ownage" is a decent replacement for activism and advocacy. So far, no promised torrent for the data has appeared on the Pirate Bay account Anonymous is pointing to, but that's sure to change any minute now.

Update: I placed a call to Puckett & Faraj, and they have no idea they've been hacked. Waiting for a call back.

Update 2: The firm's site is currently down.

Update 3: A source within Anonymous tells me all of today's strikes are indeed a coordinated effort, though not all tied to the Wuterich case: "Each attack has it's particular motivations. For example, boston police have been in our crosshairs ever since they started harassing the occupation movement there."

Update 4: You can find a screencap of the original defacement and manifesto here.

Update 5: A torrent of the firm's data is currently being prepared for the public.

Update 6: A day later and still no public torrent, although the snatched data is available via encrypted browser network Tor. Our pals at Gawker have already found some nuggets.
http://gizmodo.com/5882057/anonymous-leaks-marine-corps-massacre-case



Anonymous' gutting of Puckett & Faraj, the firm that defended the Marines behind the Haditha Killing, might have been more than a major embarrassment. The hack attack might have killed the group entirely.
In an email released by Anonymous in the wake of the attack—suggesting they still had their hands inside the attorneys' bowels after the news broke—we see the firm scrambling to understand and react to the strike. They don't do so well. Their web host is clueless, conceding "Anonymous is a little out of my league" and suggesting a call to the FBI. It was a little too late for the FBI to help by this point—Anon was already in and out, and nobody had even noticed: "Why the fuck does [our host] not know about this before we have to tell them," despairs partner Haytham Faraj. "Not sure how this will affect the business of the firm going forward," says namesake attorney Neal Puckett, "but for now, we're not able to do any business."

"This may completely destroy the Law Firm," laments Marcy Atwood, the Pucket & Faraj's business manager.

And this is no pissant firm, according to its self-billing:

Puckett & Faraj, PC, is a partnership between Neal A. Puckett, Esq. and Haytham Faraj, Esq. The partners have represented military members facing serious charges in a variety of cases including several high profile war crimes trials. Mr. Puckett has experience as a Federal Public Defender in the Northern District of Florida. The Firm maintains offices in Alexandria, Virginia and San Diego, California. This bi-coastal operation for military defense attorney services provides easy access to the majority of military installations in the United States and reduces the travel expenses to clients. The firm will handle all matters under any military provision or regulations governing members of the armed forces or those facing trial in federal court. We have experience as military defense lawyers in Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy and Coast Guard court rooms. Our clients seek our representation, the best military lawyers, because we win.

Now, the site remains blank—a desperate interim measure implemented by P&F's web host when it realized what'd happened, and a woman answering the phones at the firm's Virginia office wouldn't comment as to whether business was still being conducted. With so many private emails left out to hang across the internet, I can imagine there's many a potential client reconsidering his options. If you're being tried for war crimes, you don't want a lawyer with a security limp.

If Anonymous wanted to damage a business they believe let a murderer go free, it looks like their online attack has already had serious IRL consequences.

:laugh: burn, motherfuckers!

Zostrianos
7th February 2012, 06:00
:laugh: Hahaahah!! This is awesome :cool:
I thought hackers could only shut down websites, not steal that much stuff.
Brilliant:thumbup1:

X5N
7th February 2012, 06:07
THIS is the kind of thing Anonymous should do. DDoS attacks are stupid and don't accomplish anything -- this kind of thing does.

PhoenixAsh
7th February 2012, 06:18
So...what about the system the lawyers are playing? How does this in fact....attack the system which created the means for these people to get off lightly?

What it does do is cater into the myth that some induviduals are solely and privately responsible for acts of horror instead of the military machine that created them. Releasing this kind of information is nice and all. But sentencing these people to 3, 10, 20 years does nothing to change the fact that the US military will not be the one getting the brunt of what they are responsible for. Rather it once again deflects the guilt and creates more scapegoats. Ït serves no purpose other than that and it doesn't in fact create a national debate or action against the military apparatus.

RedSonRising
7th February 2012, 06:35
So...what about the system the lawyers are playing? How does this in fact....attack the system which created the means for these people to get off lightly?

What it does do is cater into the myth that some induviduals are solely and privately responsible for acts of horror instead of the military machine that created them. Releasing this kind of information is nice and all. But sentencing these people to 3, 10, 20 years does nothing to change the fact that the US military will not be the one getting the brunt of what they are responsible for. Rather it once again deflects the guilt and creates more scapegoats. Ït serves no purpose other than that and it doesn't in fact create a national debate or action against the military apparatus.

I think individual cases such as these highlight the patterns and structures present within the State apparatus that the average person isn't familiar with. I agree that it would be more useful to create a narrative about systemic oppression and not just narrow it down to what may seem like "exceptional" cases, but at the same time, the internal dynamics of the unjust military judicial process is being laid out naked for all to see, and this isn't the only bit of classified information Anonymous has scandalously leaked to the public.

Renegade Saint
7th February 2012, 17:27
So...what about the system the lawyers are playing? How does this in fact....attack the system which created the means for these people to get off lightly?

What it does do is cater into the myth that some induviduals are solely and privately responsible for acts of horror instead of the military machine that created them. Releasing this kind of information is nice and all. But sentencing these people to 3, 10, 20 years does nothing to change the fact that the US military will not be the one getting the brunt of what they are responsible for. Rather it once again deflects the guilt and creates more scapegoats. Ït serves no purpose other than that and it doesn't in fact create a national debate or action against the military apparatus.
Sorry, but Anonymous can't bring down the whole system all by themselves, even if they wanted to.

Ocean Seal
7th February 2012, 17:57
THIS is the kind of thing Anonymous should do. DDoS attacks are stupid and don't accomplish anything -- this kind of thing does.
No, it really doesn't. This type of thing is really well deserved to the military bastards who did this and those who allowed an incident like this to happen, but it doesn't capture the whole picture. And it doesn't go anywhere from here. Because anonymous is a secret organization of a few internet kiddies without real leadership it doesn't turn into a mass protest or a massive anti-military sentiment, strikes, or anything like that. I mean I support it, but I don't think that this kind of thing really accomplishes anything.

Sendo
9th February 2012, 01:08
Stop raining on the parade. Anonymous is amazingly great.

While unions and students and activists are agitating publicly at home and oppressed peoples fight back abroad, you have people mostly within the belly of the beast peppering the establishment with attacks like these.

This isn't like someone spending years planning a useless bombing of some convenience store. This is effective retaliation with a minimum of effort.

This is also without bloodshed and a good deal of America sympathizes with their causes or champions their work.

This is adolescent cynicism at work. Not that anyone is adolescent in age,but in character. This isn't some naive celebration like Obama's coronation, I mean inauguration. This is a bit of revenge on an amoral law firm (or immoral, depending on your view) and people whine about how lawyers still exist as a profession.

No declared Mission Accomplished! Let some of us enjoy the occasional victory.

Sendo
9th February 2012, 01:11
No, it really doesn't. This type of thing is really well deserved to the military bastards who did this and those who allowed an incident like this to happen, but it doesn't capture the whole picture. And it doesn't go anywhere from here. Because anonymous is a secret organization of a few internet kiddies without real leadership it doesn't turn into a mass protest or a massive anti-military sentiment, strikes, or anything like that. I mean I support it, but I don't think that this kind of thing really accomplishes anything.

It is possible to be party member, or union representative, or any old worker and take part in what Anonymous does. The fact that 14-year olds are capable of participating means squat. Castro's merry band of rogues including more than a few teenagers. Africa is full of child soldiers. Should we mock wars, invasions, and revolutionaries as a bunch of popgun-toting battlefield kiddies?

gorillafuck
9th February 2012, 01:27
No, it really doesn't. This type of thing is really well deserved to the military bastards who did this and those who allowed an incident like this to happen, but it doesn't capture the whole picture. And it doesn't go anywhere from here. Because anonymous is a secret organization of a few internet kiddies without real leadership it doesn't turn into a mass protest or a massive anti-military sentiment, strikes, or anything like that. I mean I support it, but I don't think that this kind of thing really accomplishes anything.these hackers aren't kids...

exposing individual cases can help in exposing systems.