Polyphonic Foxes
3rd February 2012, 09:50
"We have to support X country or we're traitors, regardless of what they do - sure they make mistakes like everyone but they are true existing X and we need to defend that no matter what, otherwise we have no right to call ourselves X "
Is it just me or do supporters of North Korea or the USSR sound identicle to Glenn beck or Bill O'Reilly when they talk about this stuff? The same hostile clambering to guilt trip us ("Good men/workers dying for your freedom/communism") the same old almost rabbid declarations of "if you disagree you're helping the terrorists/the bourgeoisie!", the same general idea that censorship and that old chestnut: This is reality, stop being so idealistic.
It's almost amusing in a sickening way that the Leninist left sticks to "it's nations" with loyality I can only compare to the blind conservatism and nationalism of random idiotic talk show hosts.
But hey, I'm automatically a counterrevolutionary, petit-bourgeoisie element dangerous to proletarian interests.
I know I'm basically gonna get floored for saying all this, but I've very rarely seen any of this said outright, my theory is because libertarian socialists don't want to get into a pissing contest with a group of people primarily made up of internet tough guys and bullies.
Is it just me or do supporters of North Korea or the USSR sound identicle to Glenn beck or Bill O'Reilly when they talk about this stuff? The same hostile clambering to guilt trip us ("Good men/workers dying for your freedom/communism") the same old almost rabbid declarations of "if you disagree you're helping the terrorists/the bourgeoisie!", the same general idea that censorship and that old chestnut: This is reality, stop being so idealistic.
It's almost amusing in a sickening way that the Leninist left sticks to "it's nations" with loyality I can only compare to the blind conservatism and nationalism of random idiotic talk show hosts.
But hey, I'm automatically a counterrevolutionary, petit-bourgeoisie element dangerous to proletarian interests.
I know I'm basically gonna get floored for saying all this, but I've very rarely seen any of this said outright, my theory is because libertarian socialists don't want to get into a pissing contest with a group of people primarily made up of internet tough guys and bullies.