Log in

View Full Version : Al-Shabab bans Red Cross from Somalia



Princess Luna
31st January 2012, 00:49
http://www.aljazeera.com/mritems/Images/2012/1/30/201213021757644734_20.jpg
Somalia's al-Shabab has banned the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), ordering it to close its emergency relief operations in the regions it controls.
The armed Islamist said in a statement on Monday that it had "decided to fully terminate the contract" of the ICRC, claiming the organiation had handed out outdated food and had "falsely accused the mujahideen [al-Shabab] of hindering food distribution".

Al-Shabab control large parts of south and central Somalia, a region the UN says is currently experiencing the world's worst humanitarian crisis, with three areas still categorised as famine zones affecting nearly 250,000 people.

The ICRC had already suspended food aid to 1.1 million people in southern and central Somalia earlier this month, due to obstruction by local armed groups, including in al-Shabab-controlled regions.

The aid suspended included food as well as seeds for farmers, and was intended to be given to the thousands struggling from years of war and the impact of a devastating drought that has ravaged Somalia since October 2010.

However, the ICRC had continued to provide emergency aid including supporting health programmes and providing clean water.

Al-Shabab said the ICRC had "betrayed the trust" of the fighters, and said it had set fire to "nearly 2,000 metric tonnes of expired ICRC rations intended for distribution".
On Twitter, al-Shabab's press office tweeted (https://twitter.com/#%21/HSMPress) that the group's Office for Supervising the Affairs of Foreign Agencies said "a thorough inspection of ICRC warehouses revealed that 70 per cent of the food stored for distribution was deemed unfit for human consumption".

Prominent journalist murdered

Meanwhile, the human rights group Amnesty International (AI) urged the international community on Monday to call on the Somali authorities to bring to justice those responsible for attacks on journalists after the latest killing of a Mogadishu reporter.

Hassan Osman Abdi, director of the Shabelle Media Network, was shot by unidentified men outside his home in the city's Wadajir district on Saturday evening. He reportedly died on his way to hospital.

The reporter, also known as 'Hassan Fantastic', is the second journalist to be killed in the last six weeks in Somalia.
Nazanine Moshiri, Al Jazeera's East Africa correspondent, who had interviewed Abdi (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsKdEjxGGzU) in the past, said: "He was extremely brave talking to Al Jazeera on camera using his real name ... he actually told me he did not care what happened to him, and he simply had to speak to truth."

The Somali authorities say they are investigating his killing.

"The numerous attacks on journalists in Somalia have been part of an attempt to silence reporting about human rights abuses by all parties to the conflict in the country," Erwin van der Borght, AI’s director for Africa, said.

"Despite Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government's promises to investigate these killings, no one has ever been brought to justice for such acts.
"It’s time that the international community takes concrete measures to tackle impunity for the killings of journalists in the country and other human rights abuses.

"Anyone found responsible for committing or ordering the killings must be brought to justice, in fair trials and without the application of the death penalty."

New approach to Somalia
Somalia, ravaged by nearly uninterrupted civil war for the past two decades, is one of the most dangerous places in the world for aid workers and one of the regions that needs them most.
In February 2012 the United Kingdom will host up to forty governments, the UN and regional bodies like the AU for the London Somalia conference in a bid to resolve the deteriorating situation in Somalia,
In November 2011, al-Shebab ordered shut 16 UN and other international aid agencies after raiding several of their offices, banning organisations it deemed "engaged in activities deemed detrimental to the attainment of an Islamic state".

Those raids left just a handful of aid agencies able to operate in rebel-held areas, including the now-banned ICRC and Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors without Borders).

Armies from neighbouring countries are converging on al-Shebab, with Kenyan troops crossing into Somalia from the far south in October, and Ethiopian troops marching in from the south and west in November.

The African Union Mission in Somalia has about 10,000 troops - from Uganda, Burundi and Djibouti - in the Somali capital Mogadishu to protect the fragile Western-backed Somali government.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/africa/2012/01/2012130175612623648.html
al-Shabab are fucking scum, they are using the people of Somalia as pawns.

gorillafuck
31st January 2012, 01:06
al-Shabab are fucking scum, they are using the people of Somalia as pawns.well they're Islamist militants who are close to al-Qaeda. of course they're scum.


The armed Islamist said in a statement on Monday that it had "decided to fully terminate the contract" of the ICRC, claiming the organiation had handed out outdated food and had "falsely accused the mujahideen [al-Shabab] of hindering food distribution".so their reaction to being accused of hindering food distribution is to hinder food distribution?

Princess Luna
31st January 2012, 01:13
well they're Islamist militants who are close to al-Qaeda. of course they're scum.

so their reaction to being accused of hindering food distribution is to hinder food distribution?
To be fair al-Qaeda fucking sucks, but at least Afghanistan isn't going though a massive famine with al-Qaeda cutting off all outside aid to the people and then destroying food supplies left behind. That is a whole nother level of douchebaggery.

Ostrinski
31st January 2012, 01:37
Fuck these shitheads. No end to this shit in site. So heartbreaking.

Xylophage
31st January 2012, 09:38
al-Shabab are fucking scum, they are using the people of Somalia as pawns.
Al-Shabaab enjoys considerable support of the Somalian people and represents Somalia's only credible government. It seems that they alone are capable of delivering to Somalia lasting peace and security. Somalian people must be free to choose their own political and social system free of outside interference, and it's up to neither you nor I to decide who they should support.

The interests of the liberation of Somalia requires the expulsion of the foreign aggressors from neighboring states that occupy the country at the behest of imperialism and the illegitimate "transitional government" that sits in Mogadishu. All of those in Somalia resisting foreign occupation are welcome in the Somali people's united front, regardless of their politics.

so their reaction to being accused of hindering food distribution is to hinder food distribution? The ones who are playing politics with the famine are the imperialists and the corrupt "transitional government" in Mogadishu, particularly how Washington has refused to send aid to places under Shabaab's authority. Blaming the Somalis and their political representatives themselves for the consequences of the famine is mistaken.

are close to al-Qaeda.Shabaab is an indigenous Somalian movement founded and led by Somalis themselves. Vast majority of Shabaab fighters and sympathizers have nothing to do with al-Qaeda.

~Spectre
3rd February 2012, 01:52
Al-Shabaab enjoys considerable support of the Somalian people

Evidence?

The Stalinator
3rd February 2012, 01:57
Vast majority of Shabaab fighters and sympathizers have nothing to do with al-Qaeda.

Where's your proof of this? Awlaki himself stated that were he a Somalian, he'd be fighting by their side.

PC LOAD LETTER
3rd February 2012, 06:19
Where's your proof of this? Awlaki himself stated that were he a Somalian, he'd be fighting by their side.
This, and:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8491329.stm

"Somali Islamist rebel group al-Shabab has confirmed for the first time that its fighters are aligned with al-Qaeda's global militant campaign. The group said in a statement that the "jihad of Horn of Africa must be combined with the international jihad led by the al-Qaeda network"."

Western media sources, etc, etc; short of going over to Somalia and asking them, this is what we get.

Crux
3rd February 2012, 09:17
Al-Shabaab enjoys considerable support of the Somalian people and represents Somalia's only credible government. It seems that they alone are capable of delivering to Somalia lasting peace and security. Somalian people must be free to choose their own political and social system free of outside interference, and it's up to neither you nor I to decide who they should support.

The interests of the liberation of Somalia requires the expulsion of the foreign aggressors from neighboring states that occupy the country at the behest of imperialism and the illegitimate "transitional government" that sits in Mogadishu. All of those in Somalia resisting foreign occupation are welcome in the Somali people's united front, regardless of their politics.
The ones who are playing politics with the famine are the imperialists and the corrupt "transitional government" in Mogadishu, particularly how Washington has refused to send aid to places under Shabaab's authority. Blaming the Somalis and their political representatives themselves for the consequences of the famine is mistaken.
Shabaab is an indigenous Somalian movement founded and led by Somalis themselves. Vast majority of Shabaab fighters and sympathizers have nothing to do with al-Qaeda.
Correct me if I am wrong but is Al-Shabaab same as the islamic courts? Al-Shabaab having more legitimacy than the "transitional government" does not really say much.

Obs
3rd February 2012, 10:49
Al-Shabaab enjoys considerable support of the Somalian people and represents Somalia's only credible government. It seems that they alone are capable of delivering to Somalia lasting peace and security. Somalian people must be free to choose their own political and social system free of outside interference, and it's up to neither you nor I to decide who they should support.

The interests of the liberation of Somalia requires the expulsion of the foreign aggressors from neighboring states that occupy the country at the behest of imperialism and the illegitimate "transitional government" that sits in Mogadishu. All of those in Somalia resisting foreign occupation are welcome in the Somali people's united front, regardless of their politics.
The ones who are playing politics with the famine are the imperialists and the corrupt "transitional government" in Mogadishu, particularly how Washington has refused to send aid to places under Shabaab's authority. Blaming the Somalis and their political representatives themselves for the consequences of the famine is mistaken.
Shabaab is an indigenous Somalian movement founded and led by Somalis themselves. Vast majority of Shabaab fighters and sympathizers have nothing to do with al-Qaeda.
You're new at the whole anti-imperialism thing, aren't you? Please tell me you are.