El Commandante
7th November 2001, 21:22
I was watching the news today and it had an interview with a minister in the American government and the interviewer asked why is it down to Blair to campaign to keep the alliance strong? The reply was it would be too much of a security risk if it was Bush.
The interviewee didn't elaborate any further so does that mean that they are scared of an attack on Bush?
View Blair as being lower in the coalition and it doesn't matter if he gets bumped off?
Or...
Is Bush such a fool that he will do somehting incredibly stupid and the American security services don't have time to go to every country he would have to visit and put child locks on all the doors and cover up sockets??
I think the later is the most true!
The interviewee didn't elaborate any further so does that mean that they are scared of an attack on Bush?
View Blair as being lower in the coalition and it doesn't matter if he gets bumped off?
Or...
Is Bush such a fool that he will do somehting incredibly stupid and the American security services don't have time to go to every country he would have to visit and put child locks on all the doors and cover up sockets??
I think the later is the most true!