Log in

View Full Version : DemRep - A new blog about Republican Democracy



Q
1st January 2012, 20:37
Rakunin and me started a new blog. To quote the "hello world!" about article:

The DemRep is a project of two marxist socialists who want to illustrate the centrality of (the absence of) radical political democracy in today’s world. While we both are members of the Committee for a Workers’ International (CWI), probably one of the bigger international revolutionary socialist organisations in the world, we do not speak in its capacity. Instead our purpose here is to start a debate on several questions: Democracy within the workers movement, Marxist programme, Party and – not to forget our namesake – the Democratic Republic.

[snip]

It is the purpose of this blog to start to engage in a theoretical discussion on political democracy, programme and republican values as a contribution to a cultural change within the left and the whole of society, so we can start to take our responsibilities seriously.
You can read the rest on the blog: DemRep (http://demrep.wordpress.com/).

We hope to bring you great entertainment value and maybe we can even learn a thing or two by engaging in debate, the latter of which is kinda the whole point.

So, add the rss feed to your favorite readers and keep posted!

Die Neue Zeit
1st January 2012, 23:40
I've gotta join! :D

Q
1st January 2012, 23:45
I've gotta join! :D

When we've planted our flag a little more firmly - that is, posted a little more about what we think about what a "democratic republic" is (and isn't!), about the subject of workers democracy, about the need for programme and party - we're very happy to post guest contributions as well. The point of the blog after all is to start and contribute towards a debate on the left about these values and what they mean to people :)

Die Neue Zeit
1st January 2012, 23:55
No, no, I don't mean as a founding blogger, just as a regular commentator for the Comments section. :blushing:

ellipsis
2nd January 2012, 20:33
i would take out the "probably" and just say "one of the largest international..."

every group is one of the largest X, you just have to draw up a large list of the largest X.

Q
3rd January 2012, 00:10
i would take out the "probably" and just say "one of the largest international..."

every group is one of the largest X, you just have to draw up a large list of the largest X.

I'm sorry, but what is the point you are making?

ellipsis
3rd January 2012, 05:12
you don't need to down play your org by saying that it is "probably one of the biggest..."

just say "one of the biggest..."

Q
3rd January 2012, 10:20
you don't need to down play your org by saying that it is "probably one of the biggest..."

just say "one of the biggest..."

The reason why we are a little cautious in the formulation is because:
1. We don't want to appear to be boasting ourselves.
2. Due to the high secrecy regarding membership numbers in left groups, it truly is a guessing game.

Q
4th April 2012, 02:39
Some belated updates:
- A small history of republicanism: the Pledge of Allegiance (http://demrep.wordpress.com/2012/03/18/47/) (18 March)
- A small history of republicanism: the American “democratic republic” (http://demrep.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/52/) (3 April)

Die Neue Zeit
4th April 2012, 04:57
I replied to one of those two America-centric blogs this morning.