Log in

View Full Version : Vaclav Havel



Red Commissar
19th December 2011, 23:04
The west's favorite anti-Communist died on the 18th. Predictably this resulted in the glowing statements about his life and achievements, standing against 'totalitarian communism' and of course ignoring the impacts of market liberalization and shock therapy privatization had on the nation. Nevermind the ludicrous condemnations and statements equating crimes of 'Communism' with Nazism. I don't generally read much of his work, but I think Parenti has a good, sobering perspective on the real Havel.

http://michaelparentiblog.blogspot.com/2011/12/must-we-adore-vaclav-havel-by-michael.html


Must We Adore Vaclav Havel? by Michael Parenti


Vaclav Havel died recently and the mainstream media has been filled with adulatory obits. Here is something I wrote about him many years ago. It gives the reader a more substantive view of what Havel really stood for.

From Michael Parenti's Blackshirts and Reds (1997) pp. 97-99:

Must We Adore Vaclav Havel? by Michael Parenti

No figure among the capitalist restorationists in the East has won more adulation from U.S. officials, media pundits, and academics than Vaclav Havel, a playwright who became the first president of post-communist Czechoslovakia and later president of the Czech Republic. The many left-leaning people who also admire Havel seem to have overlooked some things about him: his reactionary religious obscurantism, his undemocratic suppression of leftist opponents, and his profound dedication to economic inequality and unrestrained free-market capitalism.

Raised by governesses and chauffeurs in a wealthy and fervently anticommunist family, Havel denounced democracy's "cult of objectivity and statistical average" and the idea that rational, collective social efforts should be applied to solving the environmental crisis. He called for a new breed of political leader who would rely less on "rational, cognitive thinking," show "humility in the face of the mysterious order of the Being," and "trust in his own subjectivity as his principal link with the subjectivity of the world." Apparently, this new breed of leader would be a superior elitist cogitator, not unlike Plato's philosopher, endowed with a "sense of transcendental responsibility" and "archetypal wisdom." Havel never explained how this transcendent archetypal wisdom would translate into actual policy decisions, and for whose benefit at whose expense.

Havel called for efforts to preserve the Christian family in the Christian nation. Presenting himself as a man of peace and stating that he would never sell arms to oppressive regimes, he sold weapons to the Philippines and the fascist regime in Thailand. In June 1994, General Pinochet, the man who butchered Chilean democracy, was reported to be arms shopping in Czechoslovakia - with no audible objections from Havel.

Havel joined wholeheartedly in George Bush's Gulf War, an enterprise that killed over 100,000 Iraqi civilians. In 1991, along with other [e]astern European pro-capitalist leaders, Havel voted with the United States to condemn human rights violations in Cuba. But he has never uttered a word of condemnation of rights violations in El Salvador, Columbia, Indonesia, or any other U.S. client state.

In 1992, while president of Czechoslovakia, Havel, the great democrat, demanded that parliament be suspended and he be allowed to rule by edict, the better to ram through free-market "reforms." That same year, he signed a law that made the advocacy of communism a felony with a penalty of up to eight years imprisonment. He claimed the Czech constitution required him to sign it. In fact, as he knew, the law violated the Charter of Human Rights which is incorporated into the Czech constitution. In any case, it did not require his signature to become law. in 1995, he supported and signed another undemocratic law barring communists and former communists from employment in public agencies.

The propagation of anticommunism has remained a top priority for Havel. He led "a frantic international campaign" to keep in operation two U.S.-financed, cold war radio stations, Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, so they could continue saturating Eastern Europe with their anticommunist propaganda.

Under Havel's government, a law was passed making it a crime to propagate national, religious, and CLASS hatred. In effect, criticisms of big moneyed interests were now illegal, being unjustifiably lumped with ethnic and religious bigotry. Havel's government warned labor unions not to involve themselves in politics. Some militant unions had their property taken from them and handed over to compliant company unions.

In 1995, Havel announced that the 'revolution' against communism would not be complete until everything was privatized. Havel's government liquidated the properties of the Socialist Union of Youth - which included camp sites, recreation halls, and cultural and scientific facilities for children - putting the properties under the management of five joint stock companies, at the expense of the youth who were left to roam the streets.

Under Czech privatization and "restitution" programs, factories, shops, estates, homes, and much of the public land was sold at bargain prices to foreign and domestic capitalists. In the Czech and Slovak republics, former aristocrats or their heirs were being given back all lands their families had held before 1918 under the Austro-Hungarian empire, dispossessing the previous occupants and sending many of them into destitution. Havel himself took personal ownership of public properties that had belonged to his family forty years before.

While presenting himself as a man dedicated to doing good for others, he did well for himself. For all these reasons some of us do not have warm fuzzy feelings toward Vaclav Havel.

-- Michael Parenti

RadioRaheem84
20th December 2011, 02:14
Thank God for Michael Parenti. Havel was a joke.

Ostrinski
20th December 2011, 02:19
Hitchens, Havel, now Kim. The air tastes better already.

GPDP
20th December 2011, 02:28
Hitchens, Havel, now Kim. The air tastes better already.

I think somewhere out there, Thatcher just shit her granny panties.

Prometeo liberado
20th December 2011, 03:42
Well written comrade! All to often characters like these receive sainthood overnight in the capitalist media. Thank you.

RedAnarchist
20th December 2011, 11:46
I've read a few comments on Facebook and elsewhere by people who know very little about communism outside of what has been spoon fed to them by the media, where they have noted that Kim, a "communist", and Havel, an anti-communist, died on the same day (which is wrong anyway, as Kim died on Saturday morning and Havel on Sunday morning).

el_chavista
20th December 2011, 15:28
Vaclav Havel, Lech Walesa and Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, the CIA henchmen trio, earned together their last money in 2008 (the very year when the Russian died), in a joint declaration against Chávez to the press.

Sinister Cultural Marxist
20th December 2011, 16:53
Alternatively, the failure of Eastern European-style "communism" (and I use that word with quotes on purpose because those systems were not communist/socialist) is that it makes leaders like Havel popular and desirable by the masses. Why is it that false consciousness in the working class under the regimes of Eastern Europe saw such a marked increase during the 50s-80s? There's a lot to learn for the "Left" from the fall of the Berlin Wall, including that buffer state regimes tend not to make effective or popular governments in the long term.

Susurrus
20th December 2011, 17:15
A good book on the subject of the eastern bloc's collapse(and the eastern bloc itself) is Crossing the River by Victor Grossman.

~Spectre
20th December 2011, 17:43
I like Chomsky's take on this:


On Havel:

Dear Alex,
As a good and loyal friend, I can't overlook this chance to suggest to you a marvelous way to discredit yourself completely and lose the last minimal shreds of respectability that still raise lingering questions about your integrity. I have in mind what I think is one of the most illuminating examples of the total and complete intellectual and moral corruption of Western culture, namely, the awed response to Vaclav Havel's embarrassingly silly and morally repugnant Sunday School sermon in Congress the other day. We may put aside the intellectual level of the comments (and the response) -- for example, the profound and startlingly original idea that people should be moral agents. More interesting are the phrases that really captured the imagination and aroused the passions of Congress, editorial writers, and columnists -- and, doubtless, soon the commentators in the weeklies and monthlies: that we should assume responsibility not only for ourselves, our families, and our nations, but for others who are suffering and persecuted. This remarkable and novel insight was followed by the key phrase of the speech: the cold war, now thankfully put to rest, was a conflict between two superpowers: one, a nightmare, the other, the defender of freedom (great applause).

Reading it brought to mind a number of past experiences in Southeast Asia, Central America, the West Bank, and even a kibbutz in Israel where I lived in 1953 -- Mapam, super-Stalinist even to the extent of justifying the anti-Semitic doctor's plot, still under the impact of the image of the USSR as the leader of the anti-Nazi resistance struggle. I recall remarks by a Fatherland Front leader in a remote village in Vietnam, Palestinian organizers, etc., describing the USSR as the hope for the oppressed and the US government as the brutal oppressor of the human race. If these people had made it to the Supreme Soviet they doubtless would have been greeted with great applause as they delivered this message, and probably some hack in Pravda would have swallowed his disgust and written a ritual ode.

I don't mean to equate a Vietnamese villager to Vaclav Havel. For one thing, I doubt that the former would have had the supreme hypocrisy and audacity to clothe his praise for the defenders of freedom with gushing about responsibility for the human race. It's also unnecessary to point out to the half a dozen or so sane people who remain that in comparison to the conditions imposed by US tyranny and violence, East Europe under Russian rule was practically a paradise. Furthermore, one can easily understand why an oppressed Third World victim would have little access to any information (or would care little about anything) beyond the narrow struggle for survival against a terrorist superpower and its clients. And the Pravda hack, unlike his US clones, would have faced a harsh response if he told the obvious truths. So by every conceivable standard, the performance of Havel, Congress, the media, and (we may safely predict, without what will soon appear) the Western intellectual community at large are on a moral and intellectual level that is vastly below that of Third World peasants and Stalinist hacks -- not an unusual discovery.

Of course, it could be argued in Havel's defense that this shameful performance was all tongue in cheek, just a way to extort money from the American taxpayer for his (relatively rich) country. I doubt it, however; he doesn't look like that good an actor.

So, here's the perfect swan song. It's all absolutely true, even truistic. Writing something that true and significant would also have a predictable effect. The sign of a truly totalitarian culture is that important truths simply lack cognitive meaning and are interpretable only at the level of 'Fuck You', so they can then elicit a perfectly predictable torrent of abuse in response. We've long ago reached that level -- to take a personal example, consider the statement: 'We ought to tell the truth about Cambodia and Timor.' Or imagine a columnist writing: 'I think the Sandinistas ought to win.' I suspect that this case is even clearer. It's easy to predict the reaction to any truthful and honest comments about this episode, which is so revealing about the easy acceptance of (and even praise for) the most monstrous savagery, as long as it is perpetrated by Us against Them -- a stance adopted quite mindlessly by Havel, who plainly shares the utter contempt for the lower orders that is the hallmark of Western intellectuals, so at least he's 'one of us' in that respect.

Anyway, don't say I never gave you a useful suggestion.

Best,

Noam

Cambridge, Massachusetts

RadioRaheem84
20th December 2011, 17:48
That's exactly who I would've cited too; Chomsky. Good find Spectre.

Sam_b
20th December 2011, 18:05
Vaclav Havel, Lech Walesa and Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, the CIA henchmen trio, earned together their last money in 2008 (the very year when the Russian died), in a joint declaration against Chávez to the press.

Except that Havel was never in the pay of CIA compared to many in the Polish experience.

I too have encountered a lot of ignorance around the death of Havel, but in contrast have found it amongst the left and the amount of ignorance people have on the Czechoslovak experience and Czech politics in general.


Well written comrade! All to often characters like these receive sainthood overnight in the capitalist media. Thank you.

A good example of this here. The fact that Havel's Presidency of Czech Republic was relatively unpopular shouldn't get in the way of a good one-liner though eh? Indeed, much of the Czech capitalist press showed obvious disdain for Havel during his tenureship, favouring Schumpetarian policies of the much more hard-line and right wing Václav Klaus.


standing against 'totalitarian communism' and of course ignoring the impacts of market liberalization and shock therapy privatization had on the nation


Havel was actually quite against the market sell-out and the corruption within the Czech state. I also believe your claims that Havel equated communism with Nazism are in fact pure fantasy, and was something never touched upon, for instance, in Power of the Powerless essay collection.



http://www.lrb.co.uk/v21/n21/slavoj-zizek/attempts-to-escape-the-logic-of-capitalism is the best analysis i've seen, from 1999.

Os Cangaceiros
20th December 2011, 21:59
I don't know much about the Czech Republic/Czechoslovakia, so I have nothing very insightful to say about Havel, but there's something about the way Parenti writes that really irritates me. Could be the "undemocratic suppression of leftist opponents" (I realize the whole relativism argument, but this critique from someone who supports just about any douchebag/set of douchebags who oppose the USA's interests and wrap their actions in a red or semi-red flag is hard to stomach regardless), but I don't think that's it...

brigadista
20th December 2011, 22:28
Vaclav Havel, Lech Walesa and Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, the CIA henchmen trio, earned together their last money in 2008 (the very year when the Russian died), in a joint declaration against Chávez to the press.

the shit really floated to the top during that period

Sam_b
23rd December 2011, 02:29
Would be nice to look at this properly at length rather than people posting bullshit one-liners with no evidence or analysis, as seen above this post and quoted in mine. You know, get into the real understanding of the situation which i'm sure users can back up exactly who are 'CIA Henchmen' and why.