tir1944
28th November 2011, 16:48
Lol i didn't even know this was a real ideology...:laugh:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism
National-Anarchism is a radical (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_radicalism), anti-capitalist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-capitalism), anti-statist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-statism), right-wing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics) political and cultural ideology which emphasizes ethnic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_group) tribalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neotribalism).[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Macklin_2005-1) As a prelude to an anticipated racial civil war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_war) and a collapse (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse) of the capitalist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism) system, National-Anarchists seek to establish autonomous villages for völkisch (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-v%C3%B6lkisch_movements) communities, which have seceded from the state’s economy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_secession) and are no-go areas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-go_area) for unwelcomed ethnic groups and state authorities.[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Macklin_2005-1)
The term National Anarchism dates back as far as the 1920s.[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Macklin_2005-1) However, it has been primarily redefined and popularized since the 1990s by British (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_people) ideologue Troy Southgate (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_Southgate) to promote a synthesis of ideas from the Conservative Revolutionary movement (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Revolutionary_movement), Traditionalist School (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditionalist_School), Third Positionism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position), Nouvelle Droite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nouvelle_Droite), and various anarchist schools of thought (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_schools_of_thought).[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-nur21-2) National-Anarchists therefore argue they hold a syncretic political (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncretic_politics) stance that is "beyond left and right (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position)" because the conventional left–right political spectrum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_politics) is obsolete and should be replaced with a centralist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centralized_government)-decentralist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization) paradigm.[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sturgeon-3)
Scholars counter that National-Anarchism represents a further evolution in the thinking of the radical right rather than an entirely new dimension.[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Griffin_2003-4)[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-BlackSun-5)[7] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sykes_2005-6) National-Anarchism has elicited skepticism and outright hostility from both left- and right-wing critics. The former accuse National-Anarchists of misappropriating a sophisticated left-wing anarchist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_anarchism) critique of problems with the modern world (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernity) only to offer neo-fascism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-fascism) as the solution, while the latter argue they want the militant chic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_chic#Terrorist_chic) of calling themselves anarchists without the historical and philosophical baggage that accompanies such a claim.[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Griffin_2005-7)[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sunshine_2008-8)[10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sanchez_2009-9)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism
National-Anarchism is a radical (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_radicalism), anti-capitalist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-capitalism), anti-statist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-statism), right-wing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics) political and cultural ideology which emphasizes ethnic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_group) tribalism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neotribalism).[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Macklin_2005-1) As a prelude to an anticipated racial civil war (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_war) and a collapse (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse) of the capitalist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism) system, National-Anarchists seek to establish autonomous villages for völkisch (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-v%C3%B6lkisch_movements) communities, which have seceded from the state’s economy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_secession) and are no-go areas (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-go_area) for unwelcomed ethnic groups and state authorities.[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Macklin_2005-1)
The term National Anarchism dates back as far as the 1920s.[2] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Macklin_2005-1) However, it has been primarily redefined and popularized since the 1990s by British (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_people) ideologue Troy Southgate (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troy_Southgate) to promote a synthesis of ideas from the Conservative Revolutionary movement (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Revolutionary_movement), Traditionalist School (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditionalist_School), Third Positionism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position), Nouvelle Droite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nouvelle_Droite), and various anarchist schools of thought (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchist_schools_of_thought).[3] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-nur21-2) National-Anarchists therefore argue they hold a syncretic political (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncretic_politics) stance that is "beyond left and right (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position)" because the conventional left–right political spectrum (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left%E2%80%93right_politics) is obsolete and should be replaced with a centralist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centralized_government)-decentralist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization) paradigm.[4] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sturgeon-3)
Scholars counter that National-Anarchism represents a further evolution in the thinking of the radical right rather than an entirely new dimension.[5] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Griffin_2003-4)[6] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-BlackSun-5)[7] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sykes_2005-6) National-Anarchism has elicited skepticism and outright hostility from both left- and right-wing critics. The former accuse National-Anarchists of misappropriating a sophisticated left-wing anarchist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_anarchism) critique of problems with the modern world (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modernity) only to offer neo-fascism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-fascism) as the solution, while the latter argue they want the militant chic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_chic#Terrorist_chic) of calling themselves anarchists without the historical and philosophical baggage that accompanies such a claim.[8] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Griffin_2005-7)[9] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sunshine_2008-8)[10] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National-Anarchism#cite_note-Sanchez_2009-9)