Log in

View Full Version : Congress: trading stocks on inside information



Os Cangaceiros
15th November 2011, 23:03
(CBS News)
Washington, D.C. is a town that runs on inside information - but should our elected officials be able to use that information to pad their own pockets? As Steve Kroft reports, members of Congress and their aides have regular access to powerful political intelligence, and many have made well-timed stock market trades in the very industries they regulate. For now, the practice is perfectly legal, but some say it's time for the law to change.



Kroft: So congressman get a pass on insider trading?


Schweizer: They do. The fact is, if you sit on a healthcare committee and you know that Medicare, for example, is-- is considering not reimbursing for a certain drug that's market moving information. And if you can trade stock on-- off of that information and do so legally, that's a great profit making opportunity. And that sort of behavior goes on.


Kroft: Why does Congress get a pass on this?


Schweizer: It's really the way the rules have been defined. And the people who make the rules are the political class in Washington. And they've conveniently written them in such a way that they don't apply to themselves.


The buying and selling of stock by corporate insiders who have access to non-public information that could affect the stock price can be a criminal offense, just ask hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam who recently got 11 years in prison for doing it. But, congressional lawmakers have no corporate responsibilities and have long been considered exempt from insider trading laws, even though they have daily access to non-public information and plenty of opportunities to trade on it.


Schweizer: We know that during the health care debate people were trading health care stocks. We know that during the financial crisis of 2008 they were getting out of the market before the rest of America really knew what was going on.


In mid September 2008 with the Dow Jones Industrial average still above ten thousand, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke were holding closed door briefings with congressional leaders, and privately warning them that a global financial meltdown could occur within a few days. One of those attending was Alabama Representative Spencer Bachus, then the ranking Republican member on the House Financial Services Committee and now its chairman.


Schweizer: These meetings were so sensitive-- that they would actually confiscate cell phones and Blackberries going into those meetings. What we know is that those meetings were held one day and literally the next day Congressman Bachus would engage in buying stock options based on apocalyptic briefings he had the day before from the Fed chairman and treasury secretary. I mean, talk about a stock tip.

etc

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57323527/congress-trading-stock-on-inside-information/

socialistjustin
15th November 2011, 23:34
I need to get me a seat in congress!

xub3rn00dlex
16th November 2011, 04:12
And yet people still think they're on our side, fighting for us... ffs...

mrmikhail
16th November 2011, 04:18
And yet people still think they're on our side, fighting for us... ffs...

Quite foolish indeed, especially considering they are in the pockets of the "lobbyists" and by connection the corporations by which control them. Apparently americans have a problem of seeing the proverbial forest for the trees when it comes to corruption.

xub3rn00dlex
16th November 2011, 04:38
Quite foolish indeed, especially considering they are in the pockets of the "lobbyists" and by connection the corporations by which control them. Apparently americans have a problem of seeing the proverbial forest for the trees when it comes to corruption.

Absolutely. The biggest problem is that everyone was so pissed off at the banks for their dirty scheming, yet apparently their congressmen where profiting off of their miseries just as much. Good luck trying to reform the system, I'm sure the congressmen would be so willing to help! :rolleyes:

Tablo
16th November 2011, 04:46
The problem is people are not exposed to the truth. Most just rely on the mainstream media for news or don't pay attention to politics at all, unfortunately.

xub3rn00dlex
16th November 2011, 04:53
The problem is people are not exposed to the truth. Most just rely on the mainstream media for news or don't pay attention to politics at all, unfortunately.

Why is that though? I know a lot of people feel like politics is this big complicated fuck-ball of problematic equations that they can't solve, and I attribute that to mass propaganda - "You can't decide for yourself, elect me to do it for you in your best interests. Scout's honor." But why are people a-political? Wouldn't it make sense to want to have a say and understanding of what goes on in regards to your everyday life? Or are politicians really that fucking good at creating so much useless bullshit to filter through that most people would rather do something that brings them some sort of utility under capitalism?

mrmikhail
16th November 2011, 05:02
Why is that though? I know a lot of people feel like politics is this big complicated fuck-ball of problematic equations that they can't solve, and I attribute that to mass propaganda - "You can't decide for yourself, elect me to do it for you in your best interests. Scout's honor." But why are people a-political? Wouldn't it make sense to want to have a say and understanding of what goes on in regards to your everyday life? Or are politicians really that fucking good at creating so much useless bullshit to filter through that most people would rather do something that brings them some sort of utility under capitalism?

I would say the problem begins with education, the US system has really dropped massively, especially once that no child left behind bullshit was passed. Schools are by and large producing an ignorant apolitical, apathetic group who are susceptible to any propaganda that is put out. I just talked to someone last night and got involved in a political debate over the 2012 campaign, and repeatedly said he wasn't voting for Obama because he want's to "take our guns!". When I pointed out that he had no such plan for it, he said I was naive and should listen to some Rush, at which point I laughed and exited from talking with the guy. This wasn't the first person I found with this view, and it is really quite amazing that a nation spending the most money on education is producing nothing short of ignorant masses so easily indoctrinated by right wing propaganda.