RedZero
10th November 2011, 01:42
Anyone here with some experience with cameras, DSLRs in particular? I've loved pictures/photography for the longest time, but it wasn't until recently that I considered buying my own DSLR. For a while, I used a Sony DSC-W190 (http://store.sony.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&partNumber=DSCW190/B) for simple snapshots and to experiment with. Nothing special.
I absolutely love nature/landscape shots, and photojournalism (or just pictures of "news events") has interested me too. I'd probably take pictures of whatever looked interesting, honestly.
Side note/question: is it a conflict of interest when you're asking about buying a camera from a big corporation (Canon/Nikon) on a revolutionary/leftist forum? LOL. :lol: Nah, I'm mostly kidding. the thought did come up, though.
Anyway, it's apparent that the two biggest competitors are Canon and Nikon, so I assume I'll be buying a camera from one of these brands.
Here are a few links to cameras that I've bookmarked (I'm open to any and all suggestions, these are just a few that I've kept bookmarked):
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3100-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B003ZYF3LO
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D5100-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B004V4IWKG
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-18-55mm/dp/B004J3V90Y
Really, Canon seems to be more appealing. I'm not sure, though. Specifically, the T3i...but there may be even better cameras out there for a better price. A few people have told me that it would be best if I could go and hold some cameras to get a "feel" for it, since, according to them, it boils down to "personal preference/taste." Is that true, or couldn't you just...well..adapt to whatever you buy? If this is something I really need to do, it may be an issue since I live in a fairly rural area.
Another thing: lenses. I know that kit-lenses come with some of these cameras --standard lenses-- but are they really as bad as people make them out to be? I know that lenses are a big part of it and that I'll probably end up buying a few others over time, but right now...I'd just like to get started.
Thanks if you've read all of this and if you reply. Appreciated!
I absolutely love nature/landscape shots, and photojournalism (or just pictures of "news events") has interested me too. I'd probably take pictures of whatever looked interesting, honestly.
Side note/question: is it a conflict of interest when you're asking about buying a camera from a big corporation (Canon/Nikon) on a revolutionary/leftist forum? LOL. :lol: Nah, I'm mostly kidding. the thought did come up, though.
Anyway, it's apparent that the two biggest competitors are Canon and Nikon, so I assume I'll be buying a camera from one of these brands.
Here are a few links to cameras that I've bookmarked (I'm open to any and all suggestions, these are just a few that I've kept bookmarked):
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D3100-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B003ZYF3LO
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D5100-Digital-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B004V4IWKG
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-18-55mm/dp/B004J3V90Y
Really, Canon seems to be more appealing. I'm not sure, though. Specifically, the T3i...but there may be even better cameras out there for a better price. A few people have told me that it would be best if I could go and hold some cameras to get a "feel" for it, since, according to them, it boils down to "personal preference/taste." Is that true, or couldn't you just...well..adapt to whatever you buy? If this is something I really need to do, it may be an issue since I live in a fairly rural area.
Another thing: lenses. I know that kit-lenses come with some of these cameras --standard lenses-- but are they really as bad as people make them out to be? I know that lenses are a big part of it and that I'll probably end up buying a few others over time, but right now...I'd just like to get started.
Thanks if you've read all of this and if you reply. Appreciated!