Log in

View Full Version : Margaret Sanger



Odizzeus
6th November 2011, 00:28
It has come to my attention that many of you see Margaret Sanger as an inspiration or role model. I believe that it is somewhat contradictory to your doctrines. We all know Stalin murdered millions more than Hitler, (not saying Hitler was a good person by any means) and Mao murdered millions more than Stalin. This reasoning suggests that you like equal opportunity murderous dictators over murderous dictators who only murder certain groups of people specifically(even though we know the Bolsheviks specifically murdered Orthodox Christians when they came to power, but that doesn't seem to matter because Christians are always evil right?) .

How can you justify, then, the hate filled words of Ms. Sanger? You know, the ones about black people being subhuman weeds that need to be exterminated? Do tell.

ScarletSojourner
6th November 2011, 00:31
How do you honestly figure that Stalin murdered more than Hitler? Im not a Stalin fan but that is just a crazy thing to say.

You have no links also or reference for this. Can you supply?

ScarletSojourner
6th November 2011, 00:32
You do know that Orthodox Christians were and are filled with utter hatred for the jews? You have heard about the Black Hundreds? The Pogroms?

mrmikhail
6th November 2011, 00:57
To say that Stalin murdered more than Hitler is pure stupidity, while I do believe he did murder certain people who he viewed as a threat (Such as the leader of my school of thought, Leon Trotsky) he hardly eliminated "millions". And the Bolsheviks were targeting organised religion in general, not the Orthodox specifically...it just so happened that the majority of people in Russia were of the Orthodox faith, so it is but logic they would be the main group impacted). Now on the matter of Sanger, she might have been (slightly) racist, but far less so than most of her generation and advanced women's and reproductive rights quite a bit. And even with this slight racism, she opened her clinics in minority areas, and didn't allow discrimination in the organisations she ran.

mrmikhail
6th November 2011, 01:08
Also kudos to the mod/admin who banned this reactionary :thumbup:

superiority
6th November 2011, 11:22
How can you justify, then, the hate filled words of Ms. Sanger? You know, the ones about black people being subhuman weeds that need to be exterminated? Do tell.

Those words are a fabrication. Margaret Sanger never said any such thing. The nearest she came would probably have been


[We propose to] hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. And we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.

It is easily misinterpreted, but Sanger is not saying that she wants to exterminate the "Negro population" here. She is saying that she does not want the idea that she does to propagate among the community, because it would be harmful to her goals (i.e. promoting birth control, which she saw as helping the cause of eugenics).

NewSocialist
6th November 2011, 15:46
Those words are a fabrication. Margaret Sanger never said any such thing. The nearest she came would probably have been



It is easily misinterpreted, but Sanger is not saying that she wants to exterminate the "Negro population" here. She is saying that she does not want the idea that she does to propagate among the community, because it would be harmful to her goals (i.e. promoting birth control, which she saw as helping the cause of eugenics).

to be fair, she did write
“… The lower down in the scale of human development we go the less sexual control we find. It is said that the aboriginal Australian, the lowest known species of the human family, just a step higher than the chimpanzee in brain development, has so little sexual control that police authority alone prevents him from obtaining sexual satisfaction on the streets.[20].” Margaret Sanger, “What Every Girl Should Know” 1920, pg. 47

she totally bought into the whole racial hierarchy bullshit. she was also close friends with the extremely racist reactionary, lothrop stoddard (I think thats how you spell it) -to the point she even had him serve on her birth control board of directors. so I think her goal to have planned parenthood clinics in minority neighborhoods could have been racist in nature. she was a socialist but *a lot* of socialists were also pretty racist back in the day.

dodger
6th November 2011, 18:10
to be fair, she did write
“… The lower down in the scale of human development we go the less sexual control we find. It is said that the aboriginal Australian, the lowest known species of the human family, just a step higher than the chimpanzee in brain development, has so little sexual control that police authority alone prevents him from obtaining sexual satisfaction on the streets.[20].” Margaret Sanger, “What Every Girl Should Know” 1920, pg. 47

she totally bought into the whole racial hierarchy bullshit. she was also close friends with the extremely racist reactionary, lothrop stoddard (I think thats how you spell it) -to the point she even had him serve on her birth control board of directors. so I think her goal to have planned parenthood clinics in minority neighborhoods could have been racist in nature. she was a socialist but *a lot* of socialists were also pretty racist back in the day.

Well whatever Sanger's ideas were.....she certainly could not be in advance of the Australians. For thousands of years at least....I watched( from behind the sofa) through my fingers a TV documentary where a male drilled a hole in the base of his penis. Family planning...and note the male taking full responsibillity... If conception was desired a plug of eucalyptus gum, inserted, would ensure the semen would reach the destination. What are you all waiting for guys? Do DRAPERS still make g-great drills?
I don't know if the jury is still out on Sanger..we can see the positive, sure, also the negative....context I suppose. What I do know is around Britain there are an awful lot of Sangers...they might be cloning them...they have an inbuilt instinct, utterly misplaced, on how we might lead our lives. What is good for us. Christians have been far and away the worst, followed joint second by socialists and positive thinkers. Can you imagine, if we did not have healthy British scepticism, to challenge these people and their ideas? The awkward squad. Life would be intolerable. Maybe they miss the Empire, the working class all too often just snaps at the hand that feeds them.....ingrates.

Bardo
6th November 2011, 20:41
It has come to my attention that many of you see Margaret Sanger as an inspiration or role model. I believe that it is somewhat contradictory to your doctrines. .

http://transitionculture.org/wp-content/uploads/strawman1.jpg

NewLeft
6th November 2011, 20:57
The idea that Australian aborgines were the lowest on the scale of intellectual capability was popular in the 19th century because of Francis Galton and other scientific racists.. Now thoroughly debunked, but Margaret Sanger was actually promoting "positive eugenics," which was her means of dealing with scientific racism.

As for the quote mentioned in the original post, it is a distorted quote or a misattributed one that you are referring to.

Revolution starts with U
6th November 2011, 21:13
Time and again
Revleft amazes me
Only here could
Lowlife trash
Lay obvious falsehoods
Expecting a reaction and get,
Despite the obviousness, exactly what he desired

:rolleyes:

ComradeMan
8th November 2011, 07:32
You do know that Orthodox Christians were and are filled with utter hatred for the jews? You have heard about the Black Hundreds? The Pogroms?

Yes there have been terrible incidents of anti-semitism in the Eastern Orthodox world and to its shame the Church has been involved but.... speaking of today....all of them? Every single one? Too much generalisation and too big a timeframe. You know the land on which the Knesset was built is leased from the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem?
Source (http://www.aljazeerah.info/News/2010/June/22%20n/Jewish%20Businessmen%20Negotiating%20With%20Greek% 20Orthodox%20Patriarchate%20to%20Renew%20Jerusalem %20Land%20Leases.htm)

Iron Felix
8th November 2011, 08:05
All Russians were Orthodox Christians, to claim the Bosheviks killed them all would be to claim Bolsheviks killed all of Russia. Perhaps instead of kill you meant repressed, and not Christians, but the Church? It was an excellent idea, but, not radical enough, as obviously the Church survived and is still running today. A complete extermination of the institution would have been desirable.