Log in

View Full Version : BOGOTA (Reuters) Colombians Cheer Killing of Guerrilla Kingpin



Ocean Seal
5th November 2011, 20:26
BOGOTA (Reuters) - Colombians rejoiced at the killing of top FARC rebel leader Alfonso Cano and hoped the biggest blow yet against Latin America's longest insurgency could herald an end to nearly five decades of war.
In a triumph for President Juan Manuel Santos' security policy, forces bombed a FARC mountain hideout in southwestern Cauca region, killing several rebels, officials said.
Troops then rappelled down from helicopters to search the area, killing the widely-hated Marxist rebel boss in a gun battle during the operation on Friday.
Pictures of his dead body -- with his trademark beard shaven off -- were broadcast on television. Six laptop computers were found along with 39 memory sticks, cellular phones and cash in pesos, dollars and euros.
The death of the former student activist, who had a $3.7 million bounty on his head, is unlikely to spell a quick end to a war that has killed tens of thousands in the Andean nation.
But it will further damage the drug trade-funded rebels' ability to coordinate high profile bombings, ambushes and kidnappings that have brought them worldwide notoriety.
"It is the most devastating blow this group has suffered in its history," Santos said.
"I want to send a message to each and every member of that organization: 'demobilize' ... or otherwise you will end up in a prison or in a tomb. We will achieve peace."
DECADES OF DEATH
Overnight, some Colombians spilled into the street, dancing and chanting with joy: "Cano is dead!"
While still supported in some hard left-wing circles due to the FARC's roots as a peasant insurgency, most Colombians saw Cano as a thug funded by the cocaine trade. As well as the deaths, high-profile kidnappings have wrenched the nation and tarnished its global reputation time-and-time again.
"This is brilliant news, it's just one more of those delinquents dead and a step closer to peace," said Horacio Londono, 53, buying cigarettes at a Bogota coffee stand.
Even prior to its decapitation, the FARC, or Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, had been battered by a U.S.-backed military campaign that began in 2002. The waning insurgency has lost several other key commanders in the past few years.
Cano's death came after intelligence from a former rebel.
Many FARC fighters, demoralized by the military offensive that has cut them off from supplies of food, weapons and clothing, have begun to turn themselves in, rat on the leadership and question the basis of the struggle.
Helped by U.S. funding, the government has hobbled the FARC's once sophisticated communication system. Until a few years ago, communication was possible across vast swathes of jungle and mountain ranges using radio technology that allowed the rebel commanders to easily plan attacks and buy weapons.
Spy planes and listening technology have now left the FARC reliant on phone messages and foot couriers.
The death of Cano, 63, who took over leadership of the rebels after the FARC's founder died of a heart attack in 2008, was a massive strategic victory for Santos, who came to office last year vowing to keep up a hard-line stance against them.
It will ease the pressure he has been under over a recent upsurge in small-scale attacks, and will also reassure investors in the booming oil and mining sectors.
DEBILITATED REBELS
It was not immediately clear who would take over from Cano, though analysts suggested FARC commanders Ivan Marquez or Timoleon Jimenez, both rumored to be sheltering in neighboring Venezuela, could be candidates.
"There's no leader with the intensity that Cano has and it will be hard to get someone to replace him," said Alfredo Rangel, an independent security analyst. "In the short term there will be a lack of leadership. The end won't be automatic or immediate, but we are coming to the end of the FARC."
Cano went from being a middle-class communist youth activist in Bogota to become the top FARC leader after taking part in peace talks in Venezuela and Mexico during the 1990s.
The strike that killed him underscored how Colombia's military can now attack rebel leaders deep in the country's mountains and jungles. Once a powerful force controlling large swaths of Colombia, the FARC is at its weakest in decades.
Foreign investment in Colombia has surged since the military crackdown began in 2002. But the FARC and other armed groups still pose a threat in rural areas where state presence is weak and cocaine trafficking finances their operations.
The security gains have, though, helped Colombia recoup investment-grade ratings from Wall Street agencies this year.
"The death of Alfonso Cano confirms that there has been a turning point in the war against the FARC," said Daniel Loza, an analyst at local brokerage Serfinco. "It is another factor that boosts investor confidence in Colombia."
Desertions and military operations have whittled down rebel ranks to about 7,000 fighters, but the FARC has survived for more than 40 years, and still has a cadre of experienced mid-level commanders. Rebels are relying increasingly on hit-and-run tactics and ambushes in rural areas.
Colombian media splashed photos of Cano across their front pages, with jubilant headlines. "Cano's dead!" read several front pages identically.
Though most Colombians profess hatred for the FARC, there is still some residual support, including universities where pro-rebel graffiti sometimes appears.


http://news.yahoo.com/colombian-rebel-commander-cano-killed-government-024424330.html;_ylt=Aj8TIwSMugZaSsDDqGaOIZsC9nQA;_ ylu=X3oDMTQ0aW5pb2VzBG1pdANBcnRpY2xlIFNlY3Rpb24gV2 9ybGQEcGtnA2EwMjgxYTQzLTI4NjItMzI2OS1iMDExLWQzMTlk OTFmNDViNgRwb3MDMgRzZWMDdG9wX3N0b3J5X2Nva2UEdmVyAz kzM2ZmYjEwLTA3YmUtMTFlMS1iZmZlLWI3NmJmNDQxNTU3ZA--;_ylg=X3oDMTJvYmZwOWQ1BGludGwDdXMEbGFuZwNlbi11cwRw c3RhaWQDYmVjOGJmYWItNjdjMi0zYWZjLTgwYjQtNDE1NzQ4Mj E0ZDA1BHBzdGNhdAN3b3JsZARwdANzdG9yeXBhZ2U-;_ylv=3

Not that I think that FARC is the best thing since sliced bread but, the article's tone is a bit disconcerting. It almost entirely dismisses the peasantry and acts as if everyone is on the side of the Columbian government. I mean, yes it is bourgeois press, but its rather plain about its bias ala Michelle Maulkin.

KurtFF8
5th November 2011, 20:31
This is indeed unfortunate

BuddhaInBabylon
6th November 2011, 01:39
I wonder if the same fate awaits all in such a position as he...

The CPSU Chairman
6th November 2011, 01:43
What a repulsive article.

manic expression
6th November 2011, 01:43
And what if you were to find and kill all those leaders? Hundreds, thousands would rise to take their place...not even fascists can kill that fast.

mrmikhail
6th November 2011, 01:56
Awful article, and very arrogant of the government to think that just killing the leader is going to send the organisation into disarray, they have had leadership changes before with little issue, so who is to say that a new leader won't just take over and continue things as is with FARC?

Agathor
6th November 2011, 01:35
Colombians do appear to hate FARC. Not surprising, since they collect their revenue from drug production and random extortion. They've been known to set up roadblocks and rob every driver that they stop. Highwaymen with marxist faces.

Os Cangaceiros
6th November 2011, 01:51
The death of the former student activist

It's intriguing to me how certain leaders like Cano and Guzman come from academia, yet claim to be acting in the best interests of peasants and (usually secondarily) the working class. It's all very paternalistic.

Os Cangaceiros
6th November 2011, 01:57
Also, you can definitely bet that someone will replace him. Who wouldn't, with that sweet profit margin at stake? If I controlled FARC it'd be snowing year 'round, ifyaknowwhatimean.

mrmikhail
6th November 2011, 06:41
It's intriguing to me how certain leaders like Cano and Guzman come from academia, yet claim to be acting in the best interests of peasants and (usually secondarily) the working class. It's all very paternalistic.

It's worth noting that Lenin was of Russian Nobility (a fact he never hid) and quite well educated.

Trotsky as well was of the academic class.

Revolutionary leaders tend to be intelligent and of the academia class....as in the case of the Russian Revolution, this worked out quite well given the fact most workers were not capable of organising a revolution on their own (see the Russian Revolution of 1905's failure)

Os Cangaceiros
6th November 2011, 07:43
I'm glad that the ignorant masses can count on altruistic members of the academia to rescue them from economic bondage.

Jose Gracchus
6th November 2011, 08:04
By the way the Russian nobility was not some autonomous class of blood-and-soil aristocrats living off the land and defending it via the horse. It is decidedly not the same creature as the Western and Central European feudal class. By the end of the 19th century, it was a kind of perks package for the Tsarist apparatus. Civil servants who reached a certain ranking were automatically inducted into the nobility vis-a-vis the Petrine Table of Ranks. Lenin's heritage is not noble in the conventional understanding people would probably take away from that. He was part of the "declasse" intelligentsia and small middle classes.

Ocean Seal
6th November 2011, 15:52
It's intriguing to me how certain leaders like Cano and Guzman come from academia, yet claim to be acting in the best interests of peasants and (usually secondarily) the working class. It's all very paternalistic.
As opposed to certain nobles joining the anarchist movement :laugh:. Double standards bro.

KurtFF8
6th November 2011, 17:40
Colombians do appear to hate FARC. Not surprising, since they collect their revenue from drug production and random extortion. They've been known to set up roadblocks and rob every driver that they stop. Highwaymen with marxist faces.

Sigh...


It's intriguing to me how certain leaders like Cano and Guzman come from academia, yet claim to be acting in the best interests of peasants and (usually secondarily) the working class. It's all very paternalistic.

How has that translated to paternalism within the FARC in particular (or how has that moved them away from being a peasant organization)?

Die Neue Zeit
6th November 2011, 18:34
By the way the Russian nobility was not some autonomous class of blood-and-soil aristocrats living off the land and defending it via the horse. It is decidedly not the same creature as the Western and Central European feudal class. By the end of the 19th century, it was a kind of perks package for the Tsarist apparatus. Civil servants who reached a certain ranking were automatically inducted into the nobility vis-a-vis the Petrine Table of Ranks. Lenin's heritage is not noble in the conventional understanding people would probably take away from that. He was part of the "declasse" intelligentsia and small middle classes.

Why does Peter the Great's Table of Ranks sound so familiar? :o

mrmikhail
6th November 2011, 19:23
By the way the Russian nobility was not some autonomous class of blood-and-soil aristocrats living off the land and defending it via the horse. It is decidedly not the same creature as the Western and Central European feudal class. By the end of the 19th century, it was a kind of perks package for the Tsarist apparatus. Civil servants who reached a certain ranking were automatically inducted into the nobility vis-a-vis the Petrine Table of Ranks. Lenin's heritage is not noble in the conventional understanding people would probably take away from that. He was part of the "declasse" intelligentsia and small middle classes.


Russian (upper) nobility was the landowning class of Russia, and owned most of Russia into the 1900s (though were in heavy decline after the emancipation of Serfs). They formerly were the core of the army, but this right was taken away from them by Peter the Great, as a sign the state didn't need them. But you are correct in Lenin's family, his father gained his nobility via work for the state, and he was not of the landowning nobility. The latter part of your post was what I was getting at in response to Explosive Situation, showing that most revolutionary leaders are in fact of the intelligentsia.

Jose Gracchus
6th November 2011, 20:07
There is less justifiable basis for the intelligentsia substituting in for working-class leadership today than ever before.

Die Neue Zeit
6th November 2011, 20:12
Not if the leadership is provided by more educated workers, or worker-intellectuals.

Rocky Rococo
6th November 2011, 20:31
Unfortunately, the Colombian ruling class's strategy, backed by the US, of forcing the FARC to focus almost solely on its own organizational survival seems to have succeeded in causing it to follow courses of action which undermine its own depth of support, and support for revolutionary politics generally, among the Colombian masses. For those of us who have followed the course of the FARC's struggle over several decades, this decline is unmistakable, much as we may wish it were otherwise. At a certain point of time, and it may be now approaching, Colombian revolutionaries will need to visit the basic question of how productively continuing the commitment to a particular organization, the FARC, serves the long-term cause of revolutionary politics in Colombia, and whether the time for a new organizational strategy is now at hand.

mrmikhail
6th November 2011, 20:33
There is less justifiable basis for the intelligentsia substituting in for working-class leadership today than ever before.

Can you please expand upon this?

Most theorist and organisers come from an educated background....so I cannot see why they would not play a part in the revolution itself.

Die Neue Zeit
6th November 2011, 20:35
At a certain point of time, and it may be now approaching, Colombian revolutionaries will need to visit the basic question of how productively continuing the commitment to a particular organization, the FARC, serves the long-term cause of revolutionary politics in Colombia, and whether the time for a new organizational strategy is now at hand.

FARC has become detrimental, but organizational extra-legal political action should not be dismissed. The Colombian left should have at least the insights of former Republican governor Mitt Romney when he praised the Lebanese Hezbollah, and more insights by realizing that its organization actually combines the pre-WWI SPD with shooting clubs and militias (like the Weimar SPD).