Post-Lenin?

[ZeroNowhere]

OK,so I've been told that some people are called post-Leninists.Apparently they think that Lenin was really a metanarrative.They are influenced by the situationists,and also by the Neo-Puritans.

I disagree with the claim that morality is Lenin,and religious language is relative to the oppressed quality of a nation.Do you really think that a God in Swahili is good because he is not a Western imperialist?All deities are authoritarian,you know.They also hold that Lenin can only be interpreted correctly through the reading of Derrida.Tut-tut,Lenin hadn't even read Derrida!But really,I think that they overlook that the Soviet Union was a country rather than a Freudian father figure,and therefore overlook the importance of syndicalist anarchism,the best form of Marx-Leninism,as a way of rehabilitating Stalin through a Zizekian mould influenced by the writings of Wittgenstein in Essy-and-Possy through the paradigms of Testew and Cunard in a vat of raging waste.

Does anyone else have any opinions?Don't get pissed off at my opinions,tee hee.That would be like Stalin.He was bad,although in a good way,though you utopian socialists may not agree.

(Edit: I had actually meant to write that they saw morality as relative. Um, I'll let you consider what this typo shows. No, not you, Freud!)

[Ocean Seal]

OK,so I've been told that some people are called post-Leninists.Apparently they think that Lenin was really a metanarrative.They are influenced by the situationists,and also by the Neo-Puritans.

I disagree with the claim that morality is Lenin,and religious language is relative to the oppressed quality of a nation.Do you really think that a God in Swahili is good because he is not a Western imperialist?All deities are authoritarian,you know.They also hold that Lenin can only be interpreted correctly through the reading of Derrida.Tut-tut,Lenin hadn't even read Derrida!But really,I think that they overlook that the Soviet Union was a country rather than a Freudian father figure,and therefore overlook the importance of syndicalist anarchism,the best form of Marx-Leninism,as a way of rehabilitating Stalin through a Zizekian mould influenced by the writings of Wittgenstein in Essy-and-Possy through the paradigms of Testew and Cunard in a vat of raging waste.

Does anyone else have any opinions?Don't get pissed off at my opinions,tee hee.That would be like Stalin.He was bad,although in a good way,though you utopian socialists may not agree.

(Edit: I had actually meant to write that they saw morality as relative. Um, I'll let you consider what this typo shows. No, not you, Freud!)

Um what? Sorry, I tried my best, but I couldn't understand that post.

[Susurrus]

the importance of syndicalist anarchism,the best form of Marx-Leninism

ummmmmmmmmmmmm

[ZeroNowhere]

ummmmmmmmmmmmm
Look,it's only my opinion,OK?If you have a problem with it,then make an argument.You're just jealous because I'm rich,great and handsome.

(On a different note, does anyone know if there actually is a tendency called post-Leninism?)

[ComradeGrant]

Uh oh, Zero's drunk you guys.

[Susurrus]

Uh oh, Zero's drunk you guys.

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/2/bat_country.gif

[xub3rn00dlex]

Uh oh, Zero's drunk you guys.

I was just about to ask the same thing. :laugh: Zero, you alright man?

[ZeroNowhere]

I'm not drunk. I know exactly what I am doing.

So yes, I'm not alright.

[Broletariat]

The fact that you guys can't see the obvious troll/joke nature of this topic has made me lose all faith in the above posters.

[Commissar Rykov]

We should discuss Meta-Post-Mecha-Lenin. Fuck your Bourgie Notions OP! Death to Anti-Pro-Semi-Revisionists!

[xub3rn00dlex]

We should discuss Meta-Post-Mecha-Lenin. Fuck your Bourgie Notions OP! Death to Anti-Pro-Semi-Revisionists!

The T-101 is fucked.

[Susurrus]

We should discuss Meta-Post-Mecha-Lenin. Fuck your Bourgie Notions OP! Death to Anti-Pro-Semi-Revisionists!

That's ridiculous. Everyone knows that Proto-Pattonist-Lovecraftian-Antisocial-Borderline-Transitional-Alternating-Utilitarian-Electro-Anarchism is the way to go.

[promethean]

Look,it's only my opinion,OK?If you have a problem with it,then make an argument.You're just jealous because I'm rich,great and handsome.

(On a different note, does anyone know if there actually is a tendency called post-Leninism?)
Would post-Leninists engage in anti-imperialist struggle through semiological and linguistic means? :confused:

[Astarte]

OK,so I've been told that some people are called post-Leninists.Apparently they think that Lenin was really a metanarrative.They are influenced by the situationists,and also by the Neo-Puritans.

I disagree with the claim that morality is Lenin,and religious language is relative to the oppressed quality of a nation.Do you really think that a God in Swahili is good because he is not a Western imperialist?All deities are authoritarian,you know.They also hold that Lenin can only be interpreted correctly through the reading of Derrida.Tut-tut,Lenin hadn't even read Derrida!But really,I think that they overlook that the Soviet Union was a country rather than a Freudian father figure,and therefore overlook the importance of syndicalist anarchism,the best form of Marx-Leninism,as a way of rehabilitating Stalin through a Zizekian mould influenced by the writings of Wittgenstein in Essy-and-Possy through the paradigms of Testew and Cunard in a vat of raging waste.

Does anyone else have any opinions?Don't get pissed off at my opinions,tee hee.That would be like Stalin.He was bad,although in a good way,though you utopian socialists may not agree.

(Edit: I had actually meant to write that they saw morality as relative. Um, I'll let you consider what this typo shows. No, not you, Freud!)

I hear what you are saying, and I have thought along those lines before to myself, I didn't realize it was called "post-Leninism" - interesting.

I have thought in terms of whatever one thinks of Lenin, you can't deny he was dedicated 120% to the socialist revolution, and that in itself is inspirational - I guess kind of like a Che figure...

[xub3rn00dlex]

That's ridiculous. Everyone knows that Proto-Pattonist-Lovecraftian-Antisocial-Borderline-Transitional-Alternating-Utilitarian-Electro-Anarchism is the way to go.

Actually, I believe you are mistaken. Post-Lenin is definitely the state of Lenin's muscle hypertrophy after doing 3,482 pushups without rest in between. During this period, he undoubtedly had a prole shake, in order to recuperate his recently exhausted revolutions.

[Susurrus]

Actually, I believe you are mistaken. Post-Lenin is definitely the state of Lenin's muscle hypertrophy after doing 3,482 pushups without rest in between. During this period, he undoubtedly had a prole shake, in order to recuperate his recently exhausted revolutions.

You forget that he betrayed the Russian people's cats and seized control of the internet cafes, not to mention the Doughnut Terror and New Lightbulb Policy. He didn't turn Russia to socialism, he turned to state bat country.

[Broletariat]

People realise it's a troll/joke only after my post, and proceed to pretend like they knew it all along.

OH THE HUMANITY.

[xub3rn00dlex]

People realise it's a troll/joke only after my post, and proceed to pretend like they knew it all along.

OH THE HUMANITY.

We did know it all along, after Zero started trolling half the forum haha. He might have become my new favorite drunk poster after I just saw his diagram in another thread.


You forget that he betrayed the Russian people's cats and seized control of the internet cafes, not to mention the Doughnut Terror and New Lightbulb Policy. He didn't turn Russia to socialism, he turned to state bat country.

The donut terror was absolutely necessary! If he hadn't done it, the donuts would've prevented any eclairs from growing in the Caucus fields! Do you stand here to and tell me that you prefer a terrible regime of donuts over soft delicious eclairistic democracy?! Althoguh the new lightbulb policy was absolutely ridiculous, and set back plasma cannons atleast a century and a half!

[Broletariat]

We did know it all along, after Zero started trolling half the forum haha. He might have become my new favorite drunk poster after I just saw his diagram in another thread.

Zero isn't drunk, this is normal for him, see

http://redmarx.freeforums.org/handy-diagrams-t23.html

[xub3rn00dlex]

Zero isn't drunk, this is normal for him, see

http://redmarx.freeforums.org/handy-diagrams-t23.html

That is fucking hilarious. But how do you explain his intricate diagram here? There has got to be a secret message somewhere in it... if I could only decipher it... http://www.revleft.com/vb/attachment.php?attachmentid=8457&d=1320201131

P.S: I believe Zero was implying the West has big boobs.

[Blackscare]

wat



also, moved to chit-chat

[Manic Impressive]

huh I'd never seen that RedMarx forum before. Are the mods and admins all wankers there as well?

[ZeroNowhere]

huh I'd never seen that RedMarx forum before. Are the mods and admins all wankers there as well?
Broletariat's definitely a wanker.

[Threetune]

I think you have answered your own question in that, post Freudian Leninism really is fetishism of the generality made universal, if only in an ironic way for the alienated individual ‘implicit’ in the contemporary pelican narrative.

[Manic Impressive]

Broletariat's definitely a wanker.
OMG Broletariat with power :scared:

p.s. mods and admins I was only joking about you being wankers, although I'm sure your masturbatory habits are perfectly healthy.