apathy maybe
6th November 2003, 01:15
This may not really be relevant in the grand scheme of things, but it does highlight differences in philosophy.
Does everyone own everything?
Or does no-one own everything?
Really as I understand it, if you’re a communist then you would say that everyone owned everything. If you're an anarchist then noone owns everything. And if you’re a capitalist, you're either stupid or selfish :)
That is not to say that if you were , say, a social democrat (as some members of Che-lives are), that you would not pick one philosophy over the other.
Does everyone own everything?
Or does no-one own everything?
Really as I understand it, if you’re a communist then you would say that everyone owned everything. If you're an anarchist then noone owns everything. And if you’re a capitalist, you're either stupid or selfish :)
That is not to say that if you were , say, a social democrat (as some members of Che-lives are), that you would not pick one philosophy over the other.