Log in

View Full Version : Remembering Sept. 11, 1973



Andrei Kuznetsov
4th November 2003, 21:08
Remembering September 11, 1973

The U.S.-Backed Coup In Chile
Revolutionary Worker #1214, October 5, 2003, posted at rwor.org (http://rwor.org/)

We received the following from A World to Win News Service.

15 September 2003. A World to Win News Service.-
For many people around the world September 11 has been a day of mourning for 30 years. On that other September 11 in 1973, the U.S. backed a coup that overthrew the elected president of Chile, Salvador Allende. On that day of infamy and in the months and years that followed, thousands of Chileans and other nationals were herded into sports stadiums, onto islands and into desert concentration camps to be tortured and executed.

No one can say for sure how many people were murdered. At the time, Chilean revolutionaries spoke of tens of thousands of victims. Today's Chilean government says 3,000, but the armed forces that committed that crime still have the last word over political events that displease them and they are not interested in counting. Some estimates say that 400,000 people were tortured. A whole generation of intellectuals and others who could escape was driven into exile.

The dictatorship of General Augusto Pinochet ruled with impunity for 17 years. Under laws he made before stepping down, he and other murdering officers still enjoy impunity.

They are not the only ones. President Nixon is dead, but his Secretary of State Henry Kissinger who played a central role in the coup has never been called to account. Top Bush officials have explained that one reason why the U.S. refuses to recognise the World Court in the Hague is the possibility that Kissinger would be indicated for crimes that are, after all, a matter of public record. In 1973, Nixon's UN Ambassador George Bush senior stood before the UN and blatantly lied that the U.S. had no role in the overthrow of Allende. Margaret Thatcher considered Pinochet a close friend and harbored him in England. All of these people have much blood on their hands.

In fact, all of today's powers would like to pretend that these things never happened. A few months ago the Chilean Navy almost succeeded in sending the Esmeralda on a tour of the UK and Europe to promote a pretty picture of Chilean-European military cooperation. This sailing ship was once used to train sailors and, in the days after September 11, 1973, as a floating torture chamber. No government raised its voice against this travesty until the ship was turned away from European ports by activists determined not to let its ugly history be forgotten.

More at http://rwor.org/a/1214/awtw-chile.htm

Dr. Rosenpenis
4th November 2003, 21:22
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/forumfun/positive7.jpg

Kez
5th November 2003, 13:37
Old maybe, but as relevant as the day it came about.

We must learn the lessons drawn from this
http://www.marxist.com/Latinam/chile73.html

Soviet power supreme
5th November 2003, 14:41
U.S backed the coup, so what?It backed the bay of bigs too.

I'm still blaming the Chilean people for what happened.
Allende had only 20 man in the parliament house.20!
Where the fuck was the workers that day?

FistFullOfSteel
5th November 2003, 15:03
the people had no arms...thats why.so the military just attacked

Andrei Kuznetsov
5th November 2003, 19:11
I talked about this before, but I'll say it again cuz it's relevant:

It is not enough to be prepared, and organized, and willing to "fight" (which many sections of the Chilean people actually were, if you read the article). And it is not enough to say that this is the lesson of Chile.

The people there were "vigilant", they were organized, they were fighting.

The lesson of Chile, however, is that you can't make a peaceful transition to Socialism. This is the issue.

What the people didn't do is follow a Party into a revolutionary struggle that dismantled the bourgeois state entirely and especially its military. They elected a Socialist to power, and thought they were told that his presidential power could contain the military.

This was a lie, and a betrayal to the Chilean workers and peasants.

Some talk a lot about Cuba and how they supposedly "stood up" to U.S. imperialism in Cuba, but such talk hides some important things:

First the Cuban government (and Castro in particular) ENDORSED the notion of "peaceful transition" in Chile. Castro personally went to Chile and told the people to follow Allende's road. It was a road that led to the Chilean stadium.

A big part of the logic of "peaceful transition" was the idea that the U.S. would be prevented from acting by the "balance of forces" concentrated in the revisionist Soviet Union.

This too was part of the Castro rap: telling people to seek short cuts to power (focoism in Bolivia, then electoral road in Chile) and THEN rely on the revisionist communist parties and the Soviet Union to help them make it through.

This was very wrong. And to quote Castro saying that people need to fight, really disguises the rather sinister role he played in encouraging people to NOT make real revolution.

What is the lesson of Chile:

Maoists say "Without state power, all is illusion."

These are six words worth thinking about deeply...