Log in

View Full Version : New study reveals 147 controling world firms



Paul Cockshott
19th October 2011, 19:05
AS PROTESTS against financial power sweep the world this week, science may have confirmed the protesters' worst fears. An analysis of the relationships between 43,000 transnational corporations has identified a relatively small group of companies, mainly banks, with disproportionate power over the global economy.

The study's assumptions have attracted some criticism, but complex systems analysts contacted by New Scientist say it is a unique effort to untangle control in the global economy. Pushing the analysis further, they say, could help to identify ways of making global capitalism more stable.

The idea that a few bankers control a large chunk of the global economy might not seem like news to New York's Occupy Wall Street movement and protesters elsewhere. But the study, by a trio of complex systems theorists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, is the first to go beyond ideology to empirically identify such a network of power. It combines the mathematics long used to model natural systems with comprehensive corporate data to map ownership among the world's transnational corporations (TNCs).

"Reality is so complex, we must move away from dogma, whether it's conspiracy theories or free-market," says James Glattfelder. "Our analysis is reality-based."

Previous studies have found that a few TNCs own large chunks of the world's economy, but they included only a limited number of companies and omitted indirect ownerships, so could not say how this affected the global economy - whether it made it more or less stable, for instance.

The Zurich team can. From Orbis 2007, a database listing 37 million companies and investors worldwide, they pulled out all 43,060 TNCs and the share ownerships linking them. Then they constructed a model of which companies controlled others through shareholding networks, coupled with each company's operating revenues, to map the structure of economic power.

The work, to be published in PloS One, revealed a core of 1318 companies with interlocking ownerships (see image). Each of the 1318 had ties to two or more other companies, and on average they were connected to 20. What's more, although they represented 20 per cent of global operating revenues, the 1318 appeared to collectively own through their shares the majority of the world's large blue chip and manufacturing firms - the "real" economy - representing a further 60 per cent of global revenues.

When the team further untangled the web of ownership, it found much of it tracked back to a "super-entity" of 147 even more tightly knit companies - all of their ownership was held by other members of the super-entity - that controlled 40 per cent of the total wealth in the network. "In effect, less than 1 per cent of the companies were able to control 40 per cent of the entire network," says Glattfelder. Most were financial institutions. The top 20 included Barclays Bank, JPMorgan Chase & Co, and The Goldman Sachs Group.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228354.500-revealed--the-capitalist-network-that-runs-the-world.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news

Jose Gracchus
19th October 2011, 19:10
Empirical evidence for the relations between "social total capital" and "many capitals"? Meh, I wonder if this is probably headline-grabbing and bad methodology. I'll wait to poke around it myself, and see how it is received in the literature.

The author is a moron, of course. Anti-capitalism need not mean conspiracism; Karl Marx provided that this was simply the nature and fact of capital, to evolve in this manner toward centralization and socialization, and suffer systemic crisis. The solution provided was simple: abolish value, wages, money, and exchange, with it, of course, classes and the state.

Die Neue Zeit
20th October 2011, 02:04
My concern is that at least some on the left will use this to sloganeer for "expropriate the top such-and-such." That's poor methodology that doesn't consider the kind of industry.

Ocean Seal
20th October 2011, 02:30
The first thing that this makes me think, is that the Alex Jones crowd is going to come out from underneath rocks and complain about how the government is trying to poison us. Let's keep it classy fellow Marxists. 147 or 100,000, it doesn't matter, the ruling class is still an elite few.

Paul Cockshott
20th October 2011, 09:59
My concern is that at least some on the left will use this to sloganeer for "expropriate the top such-and-such." That's poor methodology that doesn't consider the kind of industry.
Before you criticise the study for poor methodology lets check if you have actually read it.

Zederbaum
20th October 2011, 11:23
I find that when discussing the nature of capitalism with non-politicos that there is a large degree of scepticism that a distinct class of capitalists exist. They view such arguments as evidence of "conspiracy theories", which they are inoculated to resist.

It's useful to have some data that counteracts that view. There aren't going to be the social relations of capital if there aren't humans to have those relations. Thus it helps people gain a better understanding of capitalism as a system if people can picture it as a system of actual people. And it helps picturing the capitalists as a class if there is some data to back it up.

Die Neue Zeit
20th October 2011, 14:49
Before you criticise the study for poor methodology lets check if you have actually read it.

I wasn't critiquing the study, comrade, but left groups that might take advantage of this the wrong way. It is those groups that have the poor methodology.

For example, land, which I think should be under public ownership and rental tenure, isn't something that can be divided into "commanding heights" and "everything else." Ditto with:

Communication infrastructure and other infrastructure
Finance
Energy
Food Production (agriculture, aquaculture, food processing, etc.)
Construction
Health (drugs, hospitals and other facilities, etc.)

The logic of "expropriate the top such-and-such" would leave a large number of businesses in those sectors as privately owned.