Log in

View Full Version : Bolivians vote to 'decolonise courts'



Die Neue Zeit
16th October 2011, 17:11
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/10/201110169924243497.html



Fifty-two judges will be elected in national vote on Sunday, the first of its kind in Latin America.
Gabriel Elizondo

La Paz - Bolivians go to the polls on Sunday but not to elect law makers; instead to elect judges.

It will be the first time judges in a Latin American country will be selected by popular vote.

In Bolivia voters will pick new justices to the Supreme Court as well as judges from three other lower courts. In all, 52 judicial positions will be voted upon.

President Evo Morales pushed for the election in order to "decolonise the judiciary", as he put it. Supporters say the election will help strengthen Bolivia's democracy and also transform a historically weak and inefficient justice system that disenfranchise the county's indigenous majority.

At the San Pedro prison in La Paz, the problems of the Bolivian judiciary come into sharp focus. The decrepit facility is more than 110 year old, has crumbling walls, and houses more than 2,000 inmates in a facility the size of an entire city block.

It's an open prison – with no confined jail cells - where all the inmates share an open space with a maze of makeshift rooms where inmates organize themselves by sections.

On Saturday, a team from Al Jazeera spent about an hour touring parts of San Pedro, where as many as fifty inmates were crammed into dimly lit rooms with no running water or bathroom facilities and forced to sleep on filthy mattresses on the ground.

A smell of mold, human feces, and marijuana mixed together.

Walls on the prison were rotting, and some second level floors housing dozens of inmates in one room were so flimsy they felt they could collapse at any moment.

All the inmates are poor, and most have yet to have their cases reviewed by judges. They remain in a state of limbo without the financial resources for top lawyer to push through their cases to a judge.

The obvious prison overcrowding, jail officials say, is a direct result of a poor judicial system that Sunday's election is meant to help solve.

The rich and mighty

In Bolivia, it's well accepted that people who are wealthy and well-connected have access to good lawyers and speedy justice.

Everyone else ends up at prisons like San Pedro.

As of October 11, there were 10,946 people incarcerated in Bolivia. Jorge Antonio Sueiro, director general of the Bolivian prison system, told Al Jazeera about 80 per cent of all inmates in the country are being held on "preventative detention" – meaning they are people who are too poor to hire lawyers and have to wait months and even years to see a judge, all the while having never been formally charged, let alone convicted, of a crime.

Sueiro strongly supports the election of judges as a first step to make the judicial system more accountable

"Our justice system is in collapse," Sueiro told Al Jazeera. "There has been a bad administration of justice in my country with judges that discriminate because of socio-economic class, race, or ethnicity. And now the Bolivian society needs judges elected by the people to administer justice that is fast, transparent, and accurate."

But not everyone agrees with how the election has been handled thus far.

Juan del Granado, a lawyer and former mayor of La Paz, says the idea behind electing judges is correct in principal, but in practice, he says, President Morales has stacked the ballot with judges who are his supporters, thus only further undermining judiciary independence.

"Only candidates with links to the government were picked to run and that ruined what should have been a historic opportunity for Bolivia," del Granado told Al Jazeera. He is part of a campaign urging people to leave the ballot blank or mark "no" as a protest vote.

The 125 judicial candidates on the ballot were selected by a congressional assembly committee made up mostly of Morales supporters, however, the opposition was allowed to view the candidates and voice appeals.

Elections as a gamechanger?

The elections are moving ahead, with more than 5.2 million Bolivians required by law to vote.

According to rules laid out by the electoral commission, fifty per cent of the candidates are women. At least one indigenous person must be on each ballot for every judicial position, and no candidate could be closely affiliated to any political party.

Each candidate had to meet basic education requirements.

More than 400 judicial candidates were disqualified for not meeting the qualifications.

But the election has been a work in progress. Judicial candidates were not allowed to campaign in any way, as per election commission regulations, so the only way voters could get information about who to vote for was through a booklet distributed by the government with candidate bios and resumes or through government sanctioned TV and radio spots that gave equal time to all candidates.

"I think we are ignorant about the elections," Marta Maceda, a middle aged woman from La Paz, told Al Jazeera. "We are going to vote for people we do not know very well so we hope whoever gets elected puts their hand over their heart and does something to improve the judicial system."

Last Friday, an elderly indigenous woman named Asunta Chiquipa sat in a plaza across the street from San Pedro prison. She was hunched over, alone, and crying.

She had come to the jail to look for her 19 year old grandson who was apparently arrested for unknown reasons, but she couldn't get any information about his whereabouts in the jail.

Chiquipa said she is poor and couldn't afford a lawyer.

"For the rich there is justice," Chiquipa said. "And for us poor people, with no money, there is not."

Will electing judges instead of appointing them help people like Chiquipa? Or the thousands of other men and women crammed into jails in this country awaiting their day in court?

On Sunday, the Bolivian people will begin to answer those questions.

Die Neue Zeit
16th October 2011, 17:14
Also: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-15294746



More than five million Bolivians are voting to elect all 28 judges for the country's top tribunals, including the Supreme Court.

By Mattia Cabitza

The vote forms part of reforms pushed by President Evo Morales to give a greater say to the country's indigenous majority.

But the election's focus has shifted away from analysing the judges' credentials to being a vote of confidence in Mr Morales himself.

"I don't agree with or support what the government is doing," says Gabriel Velez, 24, who plans to spoil his ballot to show his disapproval of Mr Morales.

By contrast, Irazhema Olivera, 29, rejects accusations that the judicial elections will be a farce.

"It's absurd to spoil ballots. Direct elections of our judiciary is political progress," she says.

Bolivia's judges have often been accused of corruption and inefficiency, and there is widespread agreement that the judicial system needs reform.

For the government, these elections will mark an end to the practices of the past, when three or four political parties directly appointed judges.

But although the elections are described as direct, voters are choosing from candidates already selected by Congress, which is dominated by Mr Morale's party, the MAS.

'On merit'

For critics like Carlos Alarcon, a constitutional lawyer, the new system is not an improvement.

"Rather than offering a real choice with real pluralist options, people are going to choose candidates who are likely to be affiliated with the governing party," he says.

Other analysts dismiss this concern.

"If Morales's main objective were to control the judiciary, he could have easily achieved this by maintaining the old system," says Kathryn Ledebur of the Andean Information Network, an independent policy think tank.

"The MAS congressional majority could have directly selected all the justices, an unsavoury prospect for the political opposition," she says.

The government insists that all candidates were chosen on merit, and not by political affiliation.

Just days before the elections, President Morales condemned campaigns to invalidate ballots.

"It seems to me a sign of desperation of those seeking the return of colonialism and neo-liberal governments.

"Evo Morales has no candidate for the judiciary because he did not come to the presidency to steal, but to serve the people," the president said.

Betrayal

Juan del Granado, the leader of the MSM opposition party, has led calls for voters to reject the electoral process by writing "No" on their ballot papers.

"MAS has betrayed the electorate and especially our hope that this would be an election of truly independent judges," he says.

"Our vote is to reject and repudiate the candidates of Evo Morales."

The elections come at a trying time for Mr Morales, whose approval ratings have fallen sharply since his landslide re-election in 2009.

There is growing discontent among voters that his government is not delivering on its promises.

Resentment has also grown following the police crackdown last month on protesters who oppose the construction of a controversial highway through an indigenous territory and national park.

For Franklin Pareja, a professor of political science at the Universidad Mayor de San Andres of La Paz, "the elections will be a good indicator to actually see if the government has lost a significant amount of followers or sympathisers".

"If rejection outweighs support, it could result in a political crisis," he says.

Running again?

But beyond the political repercussions of Sunday's elections, some sectors of Bolivian society are worried about the concentration of too much power in the president's hands.

"The likely scenario [after the elections] will be total control of the legislative, executive and judiciary branches, with the authoritarian effects that result from an exaggerated and excessive concentration of power," says Mr Alarcon.

He believes that Mr Morales could use the new judges to continue what the opposition says is political persecution of the government's critics.

Mr Alarcon also thinks that the president could receive the backing of the Constitutional Court to run for a third term in 2014.

This would run counter to the constitution that Mr Morales himself promoted two years ago.

"It's not enough, what Evo Morales says. He needs an official validation of his interpretation [of the constitution]. And the only official validation would come from the newly-elected Constitutional Court," Mr Alarcon says.

For the government, such fears are unfounded.

"This is an election to guarantee the independence of the judicial authorities," Vice President Alvaro Garcia Linares said.

Ms Ledebur believes that despite concerns the reforms are an improvement on the old system.

"The new process is imperfect, cumbersome and uncharted territory, but it is decidedly more democratic and inclusive," she says.




Branch Description Candidates Posts
COMPILED BY EMMA BANKS, ANDEAN INFORMATION NETWORK
Supreme Court
Highest authority for civilian courts
48 but split between regions
9 (one per region)
Constitutional Tribunal
Constitutional cases
28
7
Judiciary Council
Judicial oversight
14
5
Agrarian and Environmental Tribunal
Highest authority for legal disputes in these areas
26
7