Nobody likes us.

[Le Socialiste]

So, I spent the last hour reading various threads about this site from numerous leftist sites and forums (I have no life, sue me), and I have to say - nobody likes us. :crying:

Granted, I could agree with some of the criticism, when it was criticism that I was reading. But most of it was just a series of disparaging posts and threads about the "stupidity" of Revleft. I could really care less, but I figured I'd make a thread out of it - hey, it is chit-chat. So, anybody else have examples of certain sites hating on our beloved utopia? :D

http://images.cheezburger.com/completestore/2010/8/24/a00b2486-5946-4d98-9774-3e4b4d790cd5.jpg

[Blackscare]

There are a lot of bitter former revlefters or attempted revlefters out there, mostly because we're very good about banning people. Sure they'll be angry and butthurt, but they're mostly shitty people who shouldn't be here anyway. Who cares, democracy stops when you turn on your modem.

[RHIZOMES]

There are a lot of bitter former revlefters or attempted revlefters out there, mostly because we're very good about banning people. Sure they'll be angry and butthurt, but they're mostly shitty people who shouldn't be here anyway. Who cares, democracy stops when you turn on your modem.

I think there's more to it than that... although those people do exist.

The level of understanding some posters have of Marxism can be a bit amusing to people involved in tangible real-world struggles.

[Iraultzaile Ezkerreko]

Care to share some linkies. I'd like to read some of the reactionary bile these bourgeois deviationist scum have posted!

[Nuvem]

Well, Revleft is an abyss of political ignorance and liberalism for the most part.

[Iraultzaile Ezkerreko]

Well, Revleft is an abyss of political ignorance and liberalism for the most part.

Waaah.

[Triple A]

RAAN :thumbup1:

[Le Socialiste]

Care to share some linkies. I'd like to read some of the reactionary bile these bourgeois deviationist scum have posted!

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t342-unbelievable-how-pathetic-is-revleft

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t514p15-why-the-occupy-wall-street-initiative-is-failing
(Vaginal Knives gets called out on this one ;))

And this:

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/RevLeft
^What is this site, anyway? Either way, it's amusing.

There's more, but I'll leave it at that for now. Not much to go on, but it's a little something.

Edit - I had a thread from RAAN's site up, but I can't post the link for some reason.

[manic expression]

I mean, people have their opinions...nothing to worry about. I'm sure some criticisms of RL are valid and others are BS, grains of salt and all that. But since it's chit-chat...

T-4ce7bfvIk

[Susurrus]

^What is this site, anyway? Either way, it's amusing.


From their front page:

"Did you know that...

…words like Nazi, anti-semite and conspiracy theory were all created by Jews as a means of thought control?"

[Tablo]

Lollll, not like I care what some Soviet obsessed middle-school kids think of revleft.

While most here, including myself, aren't political/economic geniuses, we have several members that are serious intellectuals that know what they are talking about.

[ВАЛТЕР]

(Insert catchy one liner here)

Meh, I like this site and I think I'm pretty well informed, and traveled, and have a revolutionary mindset. I've also learned a thing or two here as well. Why even waste their time talking down another forum? We are supposed to be on the same side in theory, right?

[ВАЛТЕР]

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t342-unbelievable-how-pathetic-is-revleft

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t514p15-why-the-occupy-wall-street-initiative-is-failing
(Vaginal Knives gets called out on this one ;))

And this:

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/RevLeft
^What is this site, anyway? Either way, it's amusing.

There's more, but I'll leave it at that for now. Not much to go on, but it's a little something.

Edit - I had a thread from RAAN's site up, but I can't post the link for some reason.

Hold on, under their title it says "Welcome to the Socialist Phalanx, the online community for revolutionary socialists and left-wing nationalists"

left-wing nationalists? do they mean Nazis? or am I misinterpreting the word, because a "left-wing nationalist" seems like an oxymoron. Am I right?

[Tablo]

Hold on, under their title it says "Welcome to the Socialist Phalanx, the online community for revolutionary socialists and left-wing nationalists"

left-wing nationalists? do they mean Nazis? or am I misinterpreting the word, because a "left-wing nationalist" seems like an oxymoron. Am I right?
A quick look makes it look like there are national syndicalists and other fascist/proto-fascist people on the site.

[Le Socialiste]

From their front page:

"Did you know that...

…words like Nazi, anti-semite and conspiracy theory were all created by Jews as a means of thought control?"

Well, now I know...

[ZeroNowhere]

We're Revleft, we'll post how we want.

[RHIZOMES]

Well, Revleft is an abyss of political ignorance and liberalism for the most part.

Dogmatic Leninists like yourself who spend their time throwing around insulting buzzwords are part of the problem.

As I said Revleft is hilarious to those who are involved in tangible real-world struggles. So many people here are so myopic since they let their revolutionary worldview to be shaped entirely by an internet forum. The consistent level bad politics is mutually reinforcing.

[thefinalmarch]

stuff
That site's pretty much disgusting and reveals the identity of a user here.

[thefinalmarch]

Also go to soviet-empire's search page and search: site:soviet-empire.com revleft

(or do the same on google, which yields more results)


Reality and parasitic "left" reactions to anti-Amerikanism
January 20 2008

Here we review the accuracy of various views of anti- Amerikanism with quotes from revleft.com, a patriotic youth group of the imperialist countries masquerading as "revolutionary left." Revleft.com has mostly imperialist country users, but users from Third World countries as well. Most of the people at revleft.com know nothing of international asset distribution and believe that they are speaking for a proletariat in the imperialist countries, instead of an exploiter class of petty-bourgeoisie. As such, revleft.com-ers fail to acknowledge and understand why Al Qaeda has struck such a deep class chord among the world's exploited.

The revleft.com started as a cult of Third World revolutionary martyr Che Guevara, but changed its main name to revleft.com from che- lives.com, which is a good thing, because Che was pro-Stalin unlike revleft.com. With quotes from this youth organization, we can learn much about the extent of de facto patriotism in the imperialist countries and how that patriotism warps the information imperialist country youth feed to other Third World bourgeois youth with Internet access. Revleft.com is strategically placed to show us how the left-wing of parasitism binds youth to imperialist fatherland.

We call the revleft.com reliably patriotic, because it has been banning the followers of organizations that believe the Third World is the crux of the class struggle. They started with banning followers of Stalin until MIM objected and pointed out that they were isolating youth who ended up in fascist clutches. Yet even in 2008 there is an ongoing discussion of banning people who put forward the labor aristocracy thesis (1) that Marx, Engels, Lenin, Stalin and Mao all used.

Here is a typical quote on Al Qaeda or any Third World struggle.

"Tiny, secretive cells of religious fighters such as 'al qaeda' are equated to the working class of Islamic country's?" "I don't know where to start. good luck establishing a global revolution on that basis."(2)

FACT: At this moment, Osama Bin Laden enjoys a 46% approval rating in Pakistan, compared with the 34% of the president, Musharaff. Bush's approval rate in Pakistan is 9%.(3) Pakistan's population is approximately 165 million, which means there is an eight-digit figure of Pakistan's people alone that approve of Bin Laden. By comparison, the combined socialists and communists in the united $tates, including all the ideologies seen at revleft.com plus the ones they banned would be less than 100,000 people, a five-digit figure. So as a matter of fact, we can equate Al Qaeda to the working class of Pakistan, contrary to our revleft.com, blinded by patriotism.

The International Herald Tribune also summarized an even more pointed finding from an earlier poll done by the Pew Research Center: "In fact, feelings are so intense in the Islamic world that Osama bin Laden was chosen by five Muslim publics - in Indonesia, Jordan, Morocco, Pakistan and the Palestinian Authority - as one of the three political leaders they would most trust to 'do the right thing' in world affairs."(4) We can be sure no Trotskyists, Luxemburgists or other exotic plants made it into the top three.

The role of the ***** stream at revleft.com is to express ambivalence about anti-Amerikanism and thus pave the way for Uncle $am's boldness in wooing the left-wing of parasitism. As it stands, the State Department knows this all better than revleft.com, because the State Department does polls by country too. There is now a whole book on how the State Department polled on anti- Amerikanism and systematically exploited ambivalences among the oppressed during the late Eisenhower administration, Yankee No! Anti-Americanism in U.S.-Latin American Relations.

The loyal patriots of revleft.com are in the business of denying the facts of Osama Bin Laden's popularity, because it hurts their feelings as imperialist country parasites and their lackeys. The imperialists in the State Department have to deal with reality more than revleft.com, an example of how much Karl Marx's scientific method has been obliterated by revleft.com. When we find places like revleft.com less scientific than the State Department, we need look no further for why there is no communist movement success in the imperialist countries since Lenin. Those of us in the proletarian camp have to pierce the bourgeois delusions, not spread them.

"AQ, [Al Qaeda--ed.] on the other hand, consists of wealthy or at least well-off petit-bourgeois fanatics who enjoy very little actual support on the ground, even in Muslim countries."(5)

Where did revleft.com get this idea left unrebutted? Could it be from president Bush or neo-conservatism?

"It is a common myth that revolutionaries and terrorists are spawned by poverty, and thus have an understandable desire to overthrow the system or global order that they feel is responsible. . . . a look at the biographies of leading revolutionaries and terrorists makes clear that they come from middle and upper class families, and are usually well educated."(6)

The above is a quote from a web page for the Iraq War. The first first web link is to Daniel Pipes, one of the top academic authorities of neo- conservatism. Together Daniel Pipes, Bush and others have often drawn attention to the fact that radical leaders are petty-bourgeois or even capitalist. The reason for this is that the imperialists realized long ago that identity politics for workers is favorable to U.$. imperialist interests, so they use it, the common sentiments at revleft.com being excellent material for Bush to work with. The identity politics for workers comes up every five seconds at revleft.com. Here we have concern with individual identity raised to "love it or leave it" by revleft.com: "MIMites should move to the third world and if they feel so guilty of being labor aristocrats."(7) This again proves that the real reason that these revleft.com types cling to their wrong analysis is that they want a patriotic strategy and won't let it go. An organization really admiring Marx would think of banning imperialist country patriots, not MIM.

The above quote is also opportunism, because no class struggles so far have succeeded in an anarchist-pacifist or council communism style. The most successful class struggles have all ended up mediated by capitalist leaders, people who would be bribed by imperialism, as Gorbachev and Yeltsin were for example. The anarchist-pacifists and council communists also end up mediated by the capitalist class, but are too dense to be able to recognize that since they more or less see capitalism as a lifestyle, not a mode of production that they have failed to change.

Labor laws even in imperialist countries have gone through capitalist parliamentary institutions-- rich people--so to make some big deal about Al Qaeda having rich or super-educated leaders is opportunist, because the same applies for how class struggle has advanced in the imperialist countries generally--through capitalist mediation unfortunately thus far in history. This kind of opportunism is like saying "the sun rises and MIM does not know it." The people making such accusations are the ones who stand exposed.

Anyone needing any confirmation that the revleft.com attacks on MIM are about racism and chauvinism got it directly in the same thread Nov 1 2007 at revleft.com denouncing MIM on Osama Bin Laden: "I wouldn't use the Black Planthers as a good example of anything, but a racist reactionary movement." (8) This persyn and others like him are not up for banning, but MIM is; even though, MIM does not participate at revleft.com and hasn't in years! (It's another funny thing about oppressor nation paranoia, especially the anti-Leninist party kind.)

Piercing illusions surrounding this point is all the more difficult because the academic honchos backing revleft.com-style *****es also support identity politics. The people at revleft.com will be the ones publishing books about anti-Amerikanism in 20 years. Now, let's do some market research on revleft.com. What is it that appeals to revleft.com by the racial signals of the ideas possible for discussion?

FACT: Within the first 14.5 hours of January 14, 2008, revleft.com had 15 threads discussing "Trotsky," whose movement has not led a single revolution in the world since the death of Lenin in 1924. In contrast to the thread per hour discussing Trotsky, we would have to go back to December, 2007 before we found 15 threads discussing "Al Qaeda." There are comments on revleft.com that Al Qaeda fighters once had CIA aid against the Soviet Union, but the fact is Trotsky volunteered testimony for the House Un-American Activities Committee and exposed Soviet defense plans. So the question is, why is something called "revleft" discussing Trotsky more than Al Qaeda? Political purity is not the reason.

Trotsky was white. He believed Europe would free the world's colonies and predicted Hitler's movement composed of workers would turn the guns around for socialism in the midst of World War II. He eventually became an utter white nationalist crackpot, with lots of internationalist rhetoric to cover it up. We would not find Al Qaeda discussed 15 times at revleft.com without going back to December, 2007. Then again, Al Qaeda is not white. Neither is the Black Panther Party, which did in fact achieve plurality Black support in the 1960s in the united $tates, according to a network television poll.(9) Yet, there too, we would have to go back to December 2007 to find 15 threads discussing the Black Panther Party at revleft.com.

Readers at revleft.com will see that the revleft.com participants constantly invoke sizeism in opportunistic attacks on more popular organizations, the quotes above on Al Qaeda being proof. They also attack themselves, but in the end, all the sizeism does not prevent the people there from being Trotskyists or Luxemburgists. Most of them are coming from countries with no sizeable anti-imperialist movement, so the real end result of the sizeist critique is simply profession of faith in Amerikans, British, etc., that are not yet communist, socialist or anti-imperialist. It amounts to comparing their organizations with the size of the population they have faith in. Such professions of faith have a disproportionate negative impact on attention paid to organizations for the oppressed and exploited, not just in words, but actual practice.

Trotsky's followers have not achieved majority public opinion approval in a single country in all that time. Yet in a board flooded with such adherents of Trotsky and similar imperialist population utopianisms, they say that Al Qaeda has "little support on the ground." It shows a clear Amerikan empire bias dragging along poodles in England, Australia, New Zealand, I$rael etc.

The real reason that Bush's *****es-in-training at revleft.com like Rosa Luxemburg, Trotsky and some anarchist thinkers is that all believe the revolutionary class struggle centers in the imperialist countries. Some believe that consciously, the followers of Trotsky and Luxemburg for example. The rest believe it unconsciously through repeated testaments of faith in the lovability of their imperialist countries, especially the united $tates.

Al Qaeda claims to be anti-capitalist and fighting colonialism and U.$. occupations. Indeed, it is again in the news lately for releasing pro-Malcolm X statements to guide Amerikans.(10) An unbiased teaching and discussion curriculum regarding anti-capitalism and anti- colonialism would include Al Qaeda at least as much or more than Trotskyism. The reason this is not happening is the patriotic bias in the imperialist country left-wing of parasitism. Rosa Luxemburg died for her mistaken idea of internationalism; yet, her works have been co-opted for patriotic use at revleft.com, where they have yet to notice that since 1945 there has been no inter-imperialist war like the one Rosa Luxemburg experienced. There is no proletarianization of that kind going on, but patriots continue to latch onto Rosa Luxemburg for her values, namely her opposition to Lenin's theory of party, and her faith in Germans and Poles. For this underlying racial identification and anti-communist reason, Trotsky and Luxemburg eat up much time at revleft.com. The point at revleft.com is to appear to want to discuss internationalism, communism and socialism--just as long as it is in any fashion that has not been achieved and is thus safe for imperialism's existence. The 2004 election for Democrats came down to "dated Dean and married Kerry." The revleft.com is dating Trotsky with a future married to neo-conservatism. People calling for specific tasks to do with Al Qaeda are probably cops, but there is no excuse for not knowing what Al Qaeda is saying relative to what Trotsky is saying.

Notes:
1. http://www.revleft.com/vb/marx-engels-l ... index.html (http://www.revleft.com/vb/marx-engels-lenin-t62589/index.html)
2. http://www.revleft.com/vb/mim-endorses- ... ndex4.html (http://www.revleft.com/vb/mim-endorses-osama-t65655/index4.html)
3. http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jLQ ... VFVjYR3XA; (http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jLQ6MIkQ8UdTvBotLfxVFVjYR3XA;)
http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/200 ... /109230121 (http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/20070923/OPINION/109230121)
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.as ... %5C09%5C24 (http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C09%5C24)%
4. http://www.iht.com/articles/98482.html
5. http://www.revleft.com/vb/mim-endorses- ... ndex2.html (http://www.revleft.com/vb/mim-endorses-osama-t65655/index2.html)
6. http://freedomspeace.blogspot.com/2005/ ... cause.html (http://freedomspeace.blogspot.com/2005/04/no-poverty-is-not-cause.html)
7. http://www.revleft.com/vb/marx-engels-l ... ndex7.html (http://www.revleft.com/vb/marx-engels-lenin-t62589/index7.html), which is a thread in which not one persyn refers to Lenin's and Trotsky's definition of proletariat and semi-proletariat cited repeatedly on MIM's web page. Again, the reason is patriotism comes first, definition of class second. If my country is not a majority of people to have faith in, then these philistines argue that MIM is wrong and implicitly, we have to change Lenin's and Trotsky's definition of proletariat, rather than give up the strategy that serves their patriotic desires.

If we read this thread of this footnote carefully we will see a whole stream of people use the word "proletariat" as if it came with the implicit assumption in Lenin's writing of "proletariat in one country." Again, there is a patriotic reading of Lenin, based in a lack of effort. Obviously for Lenin, "proletariat" was an international class, and in no context could it be defined as "the majority of your country," which is generally how the word is used in revleft.com opposition to MIM.

Read this for what is NOT included in the proletariat by Lenin and Trotsky both: http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/class ... miprol.txt (http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/classics/text.php?mimfile=semiprol.txt)
8. http://www.revleft.com/vb/mim-endorses- ... ndex2.html (http://www.revleft.com/vb/mim-endorses-osama-t65655/index2.html)
9. Philip Foner, ed., Black Panthers Speak.
10. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh ... world.html (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/04/09/wlindh09.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/04/09/ixworld.html) 15Oct2007, New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/us/15 ... n,%20Osama (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/15/us/15net.html?pagewanted=2&n=Top/Reference/Times%20Topics/People/B/Bin%20Laden,%20Osama)
http://www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/viewtopic.php?p=680145#p680145

[EvilRedGuy]

Well, Revleft is an abyss of political ignorance and liberalism for the most part.


Anti-Anarchist

...

:rolleyes: Many trolls (*cough*sockpuppets*cough*) lately.

[EvilRedGuy]

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t342-unbelievable-how-pathetic-is-revleft

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t514p15-why-the-occupy-wall-street-initiative-is-failing
(Vaginal Knives gets called out on this one ;))

And this:

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/RevLeft
^What is this site, anyway? Either way, it's amusing.

There's more, but I'll leave it at that for now. Not much to go on, but it's a little something.

Edit - I had a thread from RAAN's site up, but I can't post the link for some reason.

Haha. They seriously have no life.

BTW i was the first one to find out/post about this shitty site.

Gimme some rep dammit...

[Agent Ducky]

Dude, on metapedia Zenga! Zenga! has his own page. THE FUCK?
NEVERMIND DON'T INFRACT ME PLEASE O_O

[Blackscare]

RAAN :thumbup1:

Oh for christ's sake, are you kidding me? Their forum is a joke, however bad revleft may be at least we don't have serious discussions about our dear leader Nachie retaining his jizz to power some chi-based kamehameha or whatever his stupid intentions are. Also, our admins at least don't brag about having "once stabbed a Leninist".


RAAN can fuck off back to their shitty little commune or wherever it is they come from.

[Le Socialiste]

Dude, on metapedia Zenga! Zenga! has his own page. THE FUCK?

My reaction exactly.

Nothing on Le Socialiste, though. :crying:

[La Comédie Noire]

Weren't most of those posts written by that guy Maoist Rebel News?

[Tablo]

Don't post links to information on members.

[Agent Ducky]

Don't post links to information on members.

O.o I wasn't even aware of all the shit on there, I just read teh title.... Plus... that link was on the bottom of the revleft page so anyone could've found it.... Plus it's metapedia so it's probably 75% bullshit. The mod didn't say anything O_o..... Sorry.

[Agent Equality]

Anti-Anarchist

...

:rolleyes: Many trolls (*cough*sockpuppets*cough*) lately.

Gets me everytime I see it :D Talk about sticking to dogma...


Dude, on metapedia Zenga! Zenga! has his own page. THE FUCK?

Okay that kind of made me laugh a bit :laugh:

[Tablo]

O.o I wasn't even aware of all the shit on there, I just read teh title.... Plus... that link was on the bottom of the revleft page so anyone could've found it.... Plus it's metapedia so it's probably 75% bullshit. The mod didn't say anything O_o..... Sorry.
Probably didn't see it. I recommend deleting it since people have been infracted in the past for posting that specific link.

[Misanthrope]

we have no friends!!! mom said i could have some play dates!! wtf:confused:

[Catmatic Leftist]

Socialist Phailanx is a fascist/WN website.

Metapedia is just LOL.

Anyways, who cares what nazis think?

[∞]

i hate us and i am us

[thefinalmarch]

Okay that kind of made me laugh a bit :laugh:
What was it exactly that you found amusing about that page? Was it the disgusting racism, the anti-Semitism or the anti-communism?

[GatesofLenin]

What was it exactly that you found amusing about that page? Was it the disgusting racism, the anti-Semitism or the anti-communism?
Their attitude stinks and my eyes are about to explode (white letters on a black background).

[thefinalmarch]

Their attitude stinks and my eyes are about to explode (white letters on a black background).
I don't know what you're on about since I'm seeing black letters on a white background.

[Susurrus]

What was it exactly that you found amusing about that page? Was it the disgusting racism, the anti-Semitism or the anti-communism?

You forgot the soul-destroying naruto cosplay.

[Susurrus]

No, they aren't fascists, they're Hoxhaists!
Pages in category "Communists"
This category contains only the following page.
H
Enver Hoxha

[Wanted Man]

http://94.100.116.144/1111450001-1111500000/1111458201-1111458300/1111458278_5_eicI.jpeg

[GatesofLenin]

I don't know what you're on about since I'm seeing black letters on a white background.

Pass that special cig right over comrade ... :cool:

[Triple A]

Oh for christ's sake, are you kidding me? Their forum is a joke, however bad revleft may be at least we don't have serious discussions about our dear leader Nachie retaining his jizz to power some chi-based kamehameha or whatever his stupid intentions are. Also, our admins at least don't brag about having "once stabbed a Leninist".


RAAN can fuck off back to their shitty little commune or wherever it is they come from.

RAAN ftw, best forum on the webz.

[EvilRedGuy]

Dude, on metapedia Zenga! Zenga! has his own page. THE FUCK?


:rolleyes: Whoever writes this needs to get a life, like seriously...

[DarkPast]

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/RevLeft


RevLeft (also known as Revolution Left and Revolutionary Left) is a conspiritorial Europhobic (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Europhobic) website promoting various communist (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Communist) social ills. It is ran for the most part by decadent middle-class Trotskyist (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Trotskyist) and red anarchist (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Anarchist) college students.

:laugh:

[L.A.P.]

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t342-unbelievable-how-pathetic-is-revleft

http://www.socialistphalanx.com/t514p15-why-the-occupy-wall-street-initiative-is-failing
(Vaginal Knives gets called out on this one ;))

And this:

http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/RevLeft
^What is this site, anyway? Either way, it's amusing.

There's more, but I'll leave it at that for now. Not much to go on, but it's a little something.

Edit - I had a thread from RAAN's site up, but I can't post the link for some reason.

So a forum of the most bizarre attempt of neo-fascists trying to look revolutionary and a white nationalist wiki hate us? Fuck them.

[Le Socialiste]

Guys, this was never meant to be a serious thread (it is, after all, in chit-chat). I was just bored one day and decided to google 'Revleft' and noticed other websites talking about it. I just find it all ridiculous. :)

[Susurrus]

We've got MRN foaming at the mouth.

http://maoistrebelnews.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/revleft-is-a-bunch-of-pedophile-zionists/

[Le Socialiste]

^ Yeah, I saw that one too. Who is he by the way? Or am I opening up a can of worms that would be better left closed?

[Susurrus]

^ Yeah, I saw that one too. Who is he by the way? Or am I opening up a can of worms that would be better left closed?

Voila: http://www.revleft.com/vb/guy-and-your-t162808/index.html

[ВАЛТЕР]

We've got MRN foaming at the mouth.

http://maoistrebelnews.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/revleft-is-a-bunch-of-pedophile-zionists/

This is all I need to know about him. Thank you for the link Comrade.

[ZeroNowhere]

This is all I need to know about him.
No, it's not.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxtEEDbaTJs

[Martin Blank]

Removed all links to member's personal information that were quoted. Carry on.

[Zealot]

Socialistphalanx is a group of nazis, ergo, their opinions about us don't matter.

[Rusty Shackleford]

http://www.tumblr.com/photo/1280/8723931554/1/tumblr_lpp6h4LMBS1qllzhk

[∞]

Its okay guys, come, come give me a hug.

[EvilRedGuy]

RevLeft Pride, World Wide.

[Sam Varriano]

Revisonistleft is part of the anarcho-trotskyist conspiracy, didn't you know that?

[Red Commissar]

It's just e-drama my good gents.

Oh and metapedia is a shitstain, not just for the 'far left' but for all people. It's basically the fash conservapedia, except with less trolls.

[Triple A]

Stop debating RAAN rules.

[Susurrus]

More people that hate us:

http://trotskyite.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/revleft/
https://mises.org/Community/forums/t/15602.aspx
http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/wim/wyl/socdem/revleftpatriotism0108.html
http://christian-socialist-party.blogspot.com/2008/04/beware-of-httpwwwrevleftcom-it-is-not.html
http://www.ucpa.us/wcrforum/mybb/showthread.php?tid=276

[Red Future]

http://www.prisoncensorship.info/arc...otism0108.htm (http://www.anonym.to/?http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/wim/wyl/socdem/revleftpatriotism0108.html)l

What the fuck?

[Le Socialiste]

More people that hate us:

http://trotskyite.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/revleft/
https://mises.org/Community/forums/t/15602.aspx
http://www.prisoncensorship.info/archive/etext/wim/wyl/socdem/revleftpatriotism0108.html
http://christian-socialist-party.blogspot.com/2008/04/beware-of-httpwwwrevleftcom-it-is-not.html
http://www.ucpa.us/wcrforum/mybb/showthread.php?tid=276

Wow...:blink:

[Manic Impressive]

This guy is completely correct
http://trotskyite.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/revleft/ (http://www.anonym.to/?http://trotskyite.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/revleft/)
except for the MTW thing

[Le Socialiste]

This guy is completely correct
http://trotskyite.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/revleft/ (http://www.anonym.to/?http://trotskyite.wordpress.com/2011/07/30/revleft/)
except for the MTW thing

Same here, a lot of what he said can be applied pretty fairly to how Revleft functions (or doesn't, depending on who you ask).