Log in

View Full Version : gonorrhoea may soon become incurable



Princess Luna
12th October 2011, 03:05
Health experts are warning of the 'very real threat' that gonorrhoea could become incurable.

The sexually transmitted infection (STI) - the second most common in the UK - has developed resistance to a type of antibiotic that has only been used to treat it for the last five years.

This 'alarming decrease' in the effectiveness of cefixime means a new, stronger treatment regime must be put in place, the Health Protection Agency (HPA) said.

In some cases, patients have not responded to treatment on cefixime.

Lab tests showed the infection had a reduced susceptibility in 17.4 per cent of cases in 2010, compared to 10.6 per cent in 2009.
In 2005, there were no cases reported as having reduced susceptibility to the antibiotic.

HPA experts say the STI has been easy to treat for the last 70 years but the organism that causes the infection - Neisseria gonorrhoeae - has an 'unusual ability to adapt itself' and has gained resistance to a growing list of antibiotics, from penicillin to tetracyclines, ciprofloxacin and now cefixime.

Sexual health doctors are now being told to use a combination of two drugs - ceftriaxone, a more powerful antibiotic than cefixime, which is delivered by injection, and azithromycin, which is given orally.


Professor Cathy Ison, a gonorrhoea expert at the HPA, said: 'Our lab tests have shown a dramatic reduction in the sensitivity of the drug we were using as the main treatment for gonorrhoea.

'This presents the very real threat of untreatable gonorrhoea in the future
We were so worried by the results we were seeing that we recommended that guidelines on the treatment of gonorrhoea were revised in May this year, to recommend a more effective drug.
'But this won't solve the problem, as history tells us that resistance to this therapy will develop too.

'In the absence of any new alternative treatments for when this happens, we will face a situation where gonorrhoea cannot be cured.

'Many patients may feel anxious about having an injection, but this is now the best way of avoiding treatment failure. Patients who refuse the jab will be offered oral antibiotics instead.

'This highlights the importance of practising safe sex, as, if new antibiotic treatments can't be found, this will be the only way of controlling this infection in the future.'
Terrence Higgins Trust's clinical director, Jason Warriner, said: 'It's worrying that gonorrhoea has developed resistance to certain drugs in a relatively short period of time. We're pleased to see health experts rapidly bringing forward changes in treatment and continuously monitoring the situation to ensure the infection continues to be treatable.

'Gonorrhoea doesn't always present symptoms so it's vital that people and their partners have regular screenings for it, alongside other STIs, in order to get treated at the earliest possible stage. The only way to prevent STIs is to use condoms.'




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2047517/Gonorrhoea-incurable-health-experts-warn.html

Ned Kelly
12th October 2011, 03:16
Oh please, it's from the Daily Mail..probably trying to scare people out of pre-marriage sex or some other horrible conservative agenda

Smyg
12th October 2011, 10:15
Society will collapse. Obviously.

GatesofLenin
12th October 2011, 11:15
Murdoch at it again ... :D

ÑóẊîöʼn
14th October 2011, 05:05
Fuck it, we should be getting better at wiping out bacterial infections. We did it with smallpox, let's have an encore please.

Property Is Robbery
14th October 2011, 05:09
There are antibiotics that is hasn't developed a resistance to

Luís Henrique
15th October 2011, 05:02
Phages, anyone?

Luís Henrique

Invader Zim
15th October 2011, 18:59
Murdoch at it again ... :D

Is that a joke? The Daily Mail is not a News International paper and has nothing to do with Murdoch.

Ocean Seal
16th October 2011, 00:00
So if a strain of gonorrhea bacteria develops resistance to a treatment, it suddenly becomes incurable? Nope, what does science do? Develops a new treatment.

Invader Zim
16th October 2011, 04:28
So if a strain of gonorrhea bacteria develops resistance to a treatment, it suddenly becomes incurable? Nope, what does science do? Develops a new treatment.

Is that what 'science' does, is it?

And how is this to be achieved? By producing a new antibiotic? What happens when the bacteria develop resistance to that too? You think this process has an infinate lifespan?

EvilRedGuy
16th October 2011, 16:21
I assume if we reach Communism science will be more practical and more productive, all this shit is not surprising in a capitalist world.

Technology is so crappy and slow-developing right now.

Invader Zim
16th October 2011, 18:05
I assume if we reach Communism science will be more practical and more productive, all this shit is not surprising in a capitalist world.

Technology is so crappy and slow-developing right now.

On the contary, technology is developing at a rate unprecedented in human history. Examine the state of human society just 65 years ago in the mid-1940s, as compared to where we are now. Indeed, compare society just 30 years ago in the early 80s. In this time huge leaps in just home technology. How many people owned a personal computer back in the early 80s? How many people had a mobile telephone? How many people could engage in visual and audio communication with an individual literally the other side of the world in real time?

And 'science' cannot become 'more' practical or productive. 'Science' is neither practical or productive, it is, in terms of the development of technology, a methodology.

PhoenixAsh
16th October 2011, 18:14
True but I think waht he means is that science will not be constrained by profit oriented marketing strategies where medication or treatments are mostly researched because of a lust for profit rather than for the betterment of society. Naturally this is a broad generalisation since science does obviously take place outside the profit sector...but mostly that is underfunded and constrained.

MarxSchmarx
22nd October 2011, 14:54
Phages, anyone?

Luís Henrique

One of the great promises (which is often neglected in the literature) of phage therapy is that the ability to readily develop counter-resistant viral strains to bacteria is ridiculously easy compared to developing chemical compounds to counteract bacteria. It's still tricky, to be sure. There is some evidence with E. coli that phages almost always lose arms races in the lab, but there are artificial ways around this. But I think it would mean reorganizing how the antibiotic industry works which is unlikely.

Still, though, I think there is ultimately no substitute for creating the social conditions that prevent the transmission of infectious diseases like this in the first place. Indeed, phages are useful for bacterial infections but are not available for viral infections. By contrast, all STDs can be controlled through vigorous social programs like testing clinics and education campaigns. Nobody knowingly and willingly contracts these diseases and very few people deliberately spread it. Thus unlike air or vector borne diseases, in which carriers and susceptibles can contract the disease whilst being passive, STDs are more amenable to being eradicated by controlling the transmission cycle. So it is likely that the death knell for these diseases will ultimately not be so much a clinical shift as a socioeconomic one.

GatesofLenin
22nd October 2011, 18:12
Is that a joke? The Daily Mail is not a News International paper and has nothing to do with Murdoch.

My mistake, it's owned by Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere who's net value is $1.2 Billion pounds. I'm sure he's got no ties ... :rolleyes:

GatesofLenin
22nd October 2011, 18:15
I assume if we reach Communism science will be more practical and more productive, all this shit is not surprising in a capitalist world.

Technology is so crappy and slow-developing right now.

Science would flourish under communism because it would be pure and try to solve problems. Science today is all about profit, with all the deadly diseases out there now that need to be cured, do we really need another geezer-boner pill?

Invader Zim
22nd October 2011, 21:47
My mistake, it's owned by Jonathan Harmsworth, 4th Viscount Rothermere who's net value is $1.2 Billion pounds. I'm sure he's got no ties ... :rolleyes:


Yes, it is your mistake, and now you're compounding that mistake. Of course they have no ties, they are the competition and have been trying to drive each other out of buisness for years.

senoritasmoke
5th November 2011, 21:30
No shit, diseases evolve. That's why there's a new kind of flu shot every year, doesn't mean the flu becomes uncurable, just means they need a different treatment/prevention.