Log in

View Full Version : Aris Velouhiotis speech in liberated Lamia



Delenda Carthago
9th October 2011, 20:03
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/el/thumb/7/77/Velouhiotis-lamia-1944-10-19.jpg/250px-Velouhiotis-lamia-1944-10-19.jpg





PART ONE





Why I fought

On 19th October Lamia is liberated. The forces of ELAS,
representatives of PEEA and EAM arrive in the city. On 29th October
after the celebration of the NO (Greek repulsion of Italian invasion
of 1940 into Albania) a meeting is held in the main square, Freedom,
for EAM to celebrate the victory in WW2 with a presence from the whole
district of Pamfthiotida.
Aris gives his most famous speech ever from the balcony of a hotel.

Brothers - Greek men and women of Lamia and the region – I bring
warmest greetings from the General Headquarters of ELAS.
As you will have observed, I am about to make a speech. But this
speech will not be like the speeches you have heard before from the
old party chiefs; I will not promise, as they promised, to build
bridges or make rivers flow. I cannot promise you the world, and I do
not wish to ply you with rhetoric; I wish only that you hear what I
have to say. I will begin with a fairytale.
The immortal Greek race
Once the part of this land called Greece in which we stand was
glorious and happy. It produced a culture which for two-and-a-half-
thousand years has been admired all over the world. Never has a word
been written by the wise or the unwise that is not first attested in
the works left by the creators of this ancient Greek civilization.
Once, therefore, our country was glorious; but it was later enslaved
and its former glory lost. After many years, our country found its
feet again. After a hard struggle against slavery, it was liberated
once more.
With the era of slavery came hardness and darkness. For many years
‘intellectuals’, among them a certain, Fallmeyer claimed that the
Greek race had been extinguished and that its place had been usurped
by other peoples who held nothing in common with the ancient Greek
race. But this claim was proved false. The proof was Hellenism, and
with this proof our country rose again victorious and free.
Neither foreign kings nor local landowners wanted a free and
victorious Greece . Afraid of the French Revolution and its
consequences, foreign kings created among themselves the Holy Alliance
to suppress insurrection. The local landowners were in alliance with
the Turks, and together they robbed the Greek people.
Reaction screeches
The Greek people would not be Greeks - the people of these lands of
freedom and civilization - but a people of the jungle if they failed
to produce leaders who would lead them to freedom. Knowing this,
oppressors foreign and local fought against the Greeks to prevent them
from rebelling and so gaining their freedom.
During the years of slavery the struggle – on a scale great or small,
under arms or without - was waged unceasingly.

From the Greek people emerged a sweeping revolutionary movement lent
impetus by its songs, by the idea of the insurrection of the nation
and by Rigas Feraios, precursor of the Friendly Society. Slain by the
forces of reaction before he could bring his principles into action,
the seed Rigas Feraios sowed grew rapidly; before long the Friendly
Society became a fact. It had thousands of Greek followers.
And the forces of reaction screeched! They signed deceitful treaties
such as that which emerged from the Congress of Vienna in 1815;
Ioannis Kapodistrias was one of these signatories. Under this treaty,
the forces of reaction would first support the national liberation
struggle if it broke out in Greece , only to strangle it later.
Kapodistrias, who is presented in schools as a great and important man
through the display of his portraits and speeches, was the first
destroyer of Greece . However, he did what he did not as Kapodistrias
but as a representative of Greek reaction. It was in this role that he
screeched alongside international and local reaction; it was in this
role that he signed deceitful treaties.
The people advance
Nothing was able to contain the fire of freedom that burned in the
hearts of our people. In 1821, after many trials and tribulations,
they followed the flame of Papaflessas - who used all means, even lies
– in declaring an insurrection. So it was that the revolution began in
the area of Morea in 1821.
At the declaration of this insurrection the powerful of the earth,
foreign and local alike, became frightened. The local traitors, seeing
the impossibility of containing the people and frightened by their
rage, were forced to end their collaboration with the occupiers and to
take part in the popular national liberation movement with the aim of
corrupting it.
The movement against the revolution took on an international
character. The powerful of the earth were frightened. They used all
their trickery to try to crush the revolution. But they failed. For
seven whole years our forebears fought, despite the fact that twice -
in 1823 and 1825 - the forces of reaction in Greece organised a civil
war in an attempt to break the struggle. Thus it was that our
forebears forced all our enemies to suck where once they had spat; to
recognise our struggle and our independence.
Previously no one had believed that this miracle could be achieved by
our own forces and our own people. Some waited for freedom to come
from Russia ; others put their hope in the benevolence of the kings of
Europe . But the revolution proved that it and it alone was capable of
providing freedom for our country. The myth of Philhellenism, through
which we are alleged to have achieved our freedom, was invented so it
would appear that our country was freed not by dint of its own native
strength but by that of foreigners. There were, of course, those
friendly to the Greeks – Philhellenes - who fought and spilt blood for
the freedom of our country. Honour and glory are due them for their
aid to our nation. But they were isolated individuals acting on their
own; the theory of organised Philhellenism is a myth.

The popular character

In the midst of the victory of the revolution, traitors still
dominated our country. The forces of reaction, domestic and foreign,
used all available means in their attempts to corrupt the popular
character of the revolutionary movement and impose a new regime of
slavery. In the end they achieved this. The initiator was Ioannis
Kapodistrias, the man I spoke of earlier; but later, another Ioannis –
Ioannis Metaxas – would attempt to finish the work that Kapodistrias
had begun.

The people believed that once they had achieved the revolution years
of brilliance would follow; the whole of humanity would be on their
side and our country would again guide humanity down new paths of
civilisation and progress. Instead, local and foreign forces of
reaction imposed themselves, bringing with them Kapodistrias and the
Bavarian Dynasty in place of the Ottomans.

Many years of deceit and corruption held us back from progress and
civilisation and threw us instead into desperation, hunger,
immiseration and distihia. Thus Greece , which was once the source of
light and civilisation, sunk to the lowest level of economic and
social and cultural development not merely in the Balkans but in the
whole of Europe .

The betrayal of the Albanian epic

The essence of this backwardness is to be found in the fact that the
forces of reaction directed their energies towards the torture and
exploitation of those who organised popular movements, the cultivation
of conflict within those movements and the propagation among the
people of the idea that it was their lot to live in poverty.
Taking their cue from Kolokotronis, who said that that our country is
an ‘impoverished beggar’, the reactionaries managed to convince the
Greek people that they could not stand on their own two feet; that
they must be governed by foreigners. So the reactionaries called upon
the Powers – the Russians, the English and the French. It was to this
that our rulers had brought us. Later, we were to achieve democracy,
but only because of the struggles of the people.

The snake may shed its skin, but it remains a snake.

The forces of reaction found democracy at fault for the misery of the
people and turned once again to the monarchy. They brought back the
king and commenced more brazenly to exploit the people. To silence the
people’s screams they imposed upon us Metaxas, who had been an agent
of the German High Command ever since he studied at the German
military academy.

Thus it was that after 120 years we fell into slavery again, so badly
had we been governed during those years.
It was in this situation that we found ourselves when a war against
the two colossi began to threaten. But no one thought about how our
country could escape the destruction that war would bring; instead,
knowing that this country was headed for destruction, we entered the
war.

We have documents proving that our rulers intended to make merely a
token effort in the Albanian epic and then hand Greece over to the
fascists. We have documents which prove that during November and
December 1940 we Greeks could have driven the Italians into the sea;
but our rulers instead kept the army restrained until they could use
Germany ’s victories in Europe to justify the argument that Greece was
unable to fight both the colossi. They didn't trust in the
magnificence of our army; neither in its courage, its fearlessness,
its self-denial nor its heroism, even though, hungry and shoeless in
the mountains of Albania, it had fought against fascism with great
ferocity and the aid of the Greek people.

That is how they bound us once more to slavery.
Our people were no longer in a position to continue their resistance,
however fervent their feelings. Even with their ardour, our people
were unable to hold back the assault by the metallic giant of fascism
after they had been sold out and betrayed by their leaders. Although
the people were obliged to submit, they were not defeated, since the
capitulation was signed before the army had even fought. Thus the
defeat was suffered not by our people but by the regimes which had
ruled them between 1821 and 1941. Our people are today are in the
process of turning this defeat into victory--a victory that becomes
ever more complete with the progress of time.

In such a way did the Germans arrive in our land and turn us into
slaves. But our people would not abandon their country, and the
blemish of defeat disappeared when we rebelled. And what did we get
from those who wore the XXclak and bakaliarikaXX? The only thing they
could find to tell us was:
‘Keep calm and silent. Maintain order. We have established a
government; calm down.’
In this, they reflected the will of the Germans. Such words were
spoken by those who have no right to be called Greek; but they could
not compromise the honour of our nation, of which our people are the
guardians.

And yet two and a half months later the noise of the guns began. What
words were spoken then? As in 1821 the forces of reaction conspired
against us. In the beginning, they said nothing about the guerrilla
war; they ignored it. They did as the ostrich does when it buries its
head in the sand while the rest of its body remains visible. They
thought that if they said nothing about the guerrilla war and ignored
it the commotion of war would cease. But it did not cease, and every
day the mountains were stained red with blood.

As the guerrilla war escalated and their silence proved incapable of
stopping it, the reactionaries changed tack; they set themselves to
fight us. They labelled us crooks, animal thieves, gangsters and so
on. They even found people to condemn us because we killed the traitor
and blackmailer Marathea. These people were totally stupid; they
couldn't even recognise that which was in their own interests. They
assumed that, if they attacked and disassociated themselves from us,
our struggle would cease and we would never be capable of tightening
the noose round their necks.

So be it; they were stupid then and they spoke their stupidities
aloud. Let them now eat their words.

The countryside is breathing.

How did this happen? The villagers saw for the first time that they
could safely leave their possessions outside in the open without their
being tampered with. Animal thieving had been eradicated in the
countryside and security of life and property was as it had never been
before. Was this a miracle? No. But for the first time the people of
the villages were in a position of power from which they could fight
back against betrayal, animal theft and other crimes and replace them
with security.

When we mounted our assault on these crimes and on betrayal, the
reactionaries, like women of the aristocracy who refuse to see the
human misery and impoverishment around them and instead concern
themselves with the illness of a stray cat, raised their voices and
condemned us on the grounds that we kill. Under Metaxas, women were
raped; thousands of people were martyred; many were killed and thrown
from balconies by the security services. So many crimes were
committed, even against the old. Yet none among the reactionaries
spoke up. And now they screech, ‘Aris kills!’

Yes, we have killed before and are ready to kill again if need be. Who
did we kill? We have bigger hearts than they. The proof of this is
that we were the ones who were beaten up and hunted down over the
years. We slaughtered those who betrayed the Greeks to the occupiers--
those who stole from the people and committed crimes.

Those who believe that they suffered pain when we justifiably attacked
them are ridiculously stupid, so as to side with them or they are
wholeheartedly partners in crime. Neither did this trick work either

The guerrilla war saves the people

And then the forces of reaction developed a perfect formulation:
‘We have no objection to the guerrillas’ carrying out a national
struggle, but the question is to be resolved by the big powers. What,
then, is the purpose of struggling and dying? The matter will be
resolved by outsiders!

The reactionaries found success with this formulation. Was it correct?
Of course not! And this is why:

In 1941-42 EAM was not yet very strong. That is why the struggle had
not yet taken on a mass character; neither was EAM conducting
guerrilla activity. In 1941-42 approximately 300,000 people died from
hunger and disease in Athens , Piraeus and the surrounding villages
alone, and even more would have died had EAM not mobilized the people
through demonstrations, meetings and strikes. Through these, the
people were given the courage to stop the looting of our production by
a section of the occupiers, to leave the feeding of the people to the
International Red Cross and to observe the situation of Greece
internationally

If the guerrilla war had not prevented the Germans from stealing our
production by ending the concentration on production of goods that the
occupiers favoured the number of victims of hunger and disease would
have been much higher.

Delenda Carthago
9th October 2011, 20:04
PART TWO





When have we ever heard in the history of humanity that liberation can
be achieved using backhanded methods? Never. Freedom isn’t achieved
with prayers but with struggle and suffering!
But even had we wanted, we didn’t have the right.to blacken the
history of our country. That would be disrespect to the memory of our
heroic ancestors.
Neither did we have the right to implant the stamp on the forehead of
the forthcoming generations, our children and our grandchildren, that
they originate from a land of eunuchs who agreed to die on the streets
from the most vile of deaths - from hunger - instead of dying with gun
in hand fighting for freedom.
What should we prefer? The first or the second? We answer a thousand
times with no shadow of doubt: TO FIGHT!
Better for everything to burn down instead of us capitulating to the
occupiers.
This our people realised, turning their backs on the quislings and
thus gave the heroes of ELAS their victories.

Reaction conspires.

This forced EKKA to change tune and take their own guerrilla forces
into the mountains.
But why did they do this?
EAM had declared that it doesn’t have a monopoly on guerrilla
struggle. That’s why it called on EKKA to create common guerrilla
groups. If they had the desire to fight against the occupiers they
would have done it spontaneously. But then they used to argue that the
geography of Greece and the lack of space due to the occupation did
not allow the existence of guerrilla groups.
But when they saw us liberate the country they then decided to create
a guerrilla army.

What would anyone accept from them as being the guiding principle?
What slogan would come out of their mouths? Naturally ‘Down with the
Occupiers’. But they clarified their position from the beginning.
Their first scream was:
“Down with EAM”!
But we still called on them to unite. They refused, as they didn’t
want to get their hands dirty and to struggle to fight the occupier.
They weren’t implementing the will of the Greek people, but of
reaction frightened by peoples’ democracy and they set out to fight
it.
In the end they declared war on us, with arms, collaborating with the
occupiers.
We would not be consistent in our struggle and betrayers of the people
if we hated blood. That is why, as followers of the will of the
people, we crushed these collaborators of the occupiers, those who
fought against our national struggle.
ELAS on the side of the Allies
Then they used another trick: they condemned us as not supporting the
Allied struggle and that we were the tools of the Russians. They
threatened us that when the Allies came here they would sort us out:
they who collaborated with the Germans had the gall to threaten us
that the Allies would attack us!
They who in 1941 betrayed the Allied struggle!
They who allowed the Three Hundred to be left alone in Thermopylae by
leaving the Allied English to fight alone whilst they had surrendered
the country with the quisling role of Tsolagoglou condemned for not
aiding the allied struggle and they placed in the minds of the Allies
that they would attack us on coming here.
Gorgopotamos
But very soon the first slap arrived for them! The first group of
English parachutists came not to them but to Aris in the Giona area.
Alongside them we blew up the Gorgopotamos bridge. The leader of the
Allied armies in the Middle East, General Wilson declared that 80% of
the success of the Allies in Africa was due to the blowing up of the
Gorgopotamos bridge as this stopped the sending of German war supplies
and support. And one more thing: in the Peloponnese we proposed to the
tsoliades (rightists) that they lay down their arms and we would let
them go free. But the English refused this and arrested all the
tsoliades, locked them up in concentration camps and advised they
should be tried in military courts (as quislings - translators note)
In the end we have the English with us. They are going down the
streets of Lamia and they are going to attack the Germans with us. We
will fight alongside them and not against them until the total defeat
of fascism.
But we are being attacked now by a new argument. We are being
condemned as being all communists and they are stating that EAM and
ELAS are Communist Front organisations. But can this category
constitute shame or glory?

We are Fighting for Democracy.

The Communist Party isn’t now fighting for communism. In its programme
the KKE has Communism as its final aim. But not for now. Communism
will be imposed by the people, not the KKE. I am sure that many of
those educated fellows who don’t want it today, will in future vote so
as to ensure that communism dominates.
But today the KKE does not aim at that but at a democratic solution to
the Greek problem.
But let us say that the KKE were to implement Communism. They say that
Communism destroys the churches and skins alive the priests. Are
Communists so stupid that they will destroy the churches, which do not
disturb us in any way.
Who attacks the Church?
We will skin alive the priests? But why? We see that thousands of
priests are now found in the vanguard of the movement and the
contribution of the clergy which stood on our side, was invaluable.
Is the opposite occurring? Why have those who claim to be defenders of
the church killed, along with the Germans, so many priests and skinned
some alive?
Communism will destroy religion. But religion is an issue of
consciousness. How will it be destroyed? The destruction of religious
consciousness is impossible even if the communists wanted to destroy
it. Religious consciousness does not get destroyed by simple orders.
If something like that occurred it would resemble the police officer
in Anafi who disallowed the class struggle!
What will happen in the distant future: how will humans think is
another problem. No politician can declare a law as to what should
occur after 200 or 500 years. We won’t produce such a law. We are
interested in how the people will develop today and not what
philosophical desires it has after 500 years.
Consequently do you understand that those who circulate such slander
are aiming to achieve different ends, attempting with the method of
slander to deceive the people and to maintain their dominance over
them. If we analyse more deeply the issue we will see that they are
non-religious as they have no religious consciousness. They only love
God Mammon, the God of Money...
We will make the Family Stronger
They also condemn the Communists, saying that they will dissolve
families. As if we came down from the heavens and we weren’t born in
families but sprung up like mushrooms. The family was created by
certain economic conditions. At a certain level of development of
society the necessity of the family arose as because the demands of
life were better served.
Everyone was required to work, the father and children on the farms
the women stayed at home as that is the only way society could manage
their biological needs.
The forms of economic activities which dominated then made the bonds
of its members even stronger. Today what is happening? Today’s
economic conditions do not lead to the closest working of the family
but its exact opposite.
Here is one example. A man marries but the day after he leaves for the
USA to be able to confront the needs of life and his family. Who
dissolves the family in this case? The Communists or the economic
conditions which Capitalism created?
Here we see clearly that they who condemn us as wanting to dissolve
the family are none other than those who dissolve it in reality whilst
we aim to solidify it. We will give to the people the economic
measures so the family isn’t dissolved to the four corners of the
Earth.
They condemn us that we want to abolish borders and dissolve the
State. But the State we build today no longer exists as they dissolved
it. Who therefore is a patriot? They or us? Capital doesn’t have a
country and it runs to find profit in whatever country it is able to.
That is why it isn’t concerned for the existence of borders and the
state. But all we own are our hats and the small kerb in front of us,
unlike capital that runs wherever it finds profit.

Delenda Carthago
9th October 2011, 20:05
ΡART THREE

Who can be interested more in their country? They who remove the
capital from this country or us who are stuck on our doorsteps here?

When suddenly in 1929-31 the state asked due to the economic crisis
which affected our country the foreign bond holders to lower the
interest rates which we pay for the bonds, the English agreed to
reduce it by 35% but the Greek bondholders refused. There is their
patriotism! They reach to the point when their economic interests
aren't affected. They themselves condemn us that we seek to abolish
borders and the dissolution of the state, they sell everything out at
every available opportunity.

When dishonorable people speak of honour.

They condemn us that we are the ones who oversee honour. They are all
the moral persons who when they walk get their heads woven into the
barbed wire, they speak of honour!

They who sold their women and sisters to the occupier, so as to do
business with them and turned us into double slaves, they now go to
convince us that they are the vanguard of honour and morality. With
such means they are trying to deceive the people so as to continue the
exploitation and torture. Many times they convince us and achieve what
they say really is.

Take one example of what is going on the villages. The village smokes
tobacco which he himself produces. But they convinced him that this is
illegal. The villager himself then tells you that he is smoking
illegal tobacco. As if he didn't grow it himself on his land but
brought it from America. The villager himself ended up believing that
his smoke was 'illegal'.

Reaction doesn't stop at anything so as to deceive the people, using
all the means, all the sycophancy and lies. But these sycophancies in
the country where they saw us and felt us became dust. The same will
happen in the cities.

In a few days you will see reality yourselves alone. As our aim is
only one: How our people will live better!

When the occupier was here they wanted order. We wanted disorder to
make the life of the occupier unbearable. Now they disorder. We want
order. They are the organisers of the civil war and they exploit our
people. They are the wolves that try to eat the sheep you me us in
other words the people.
We maintained our promises

EAM and ELAS promised to the people the struggle against the occupier
and the liberation of the country. We maintain these promises. We
didn't create a government press. It was created on its own by the
people. From October 1942 the people on its own went for elections and
their own self-government.

This institution of self-government which for the first time appeared
in Euritania constituted its beginnings from creation in the village
till the P E E A (govt of the mountains) later...

We are for unity

We are for the unity and due to our attempts 95% of the creation of
our national government under which we are fighting today. Until
Larissa our country is now free. We will liberate the rest of the
country soon.

Thus our second promise will be realised fully.


Our struggle for popular rule.



We also promised the people something else: that we wont leave our
hands if we dont achieve our double freedom. That is what we will
fight to achieve this promise of ours as well dedicating our lives and
sacrificing it for a popular rule solution to the problems of the
Greek problem.

ELAS in the first years of the CC of EAM and PEEA later constituted
the strong weapon of maintaining the people in life. The vehicle of
our faster liberation. Now in the hands of our national liberation
which is composed by all the parties and organisations that support
popular rule dominated solutions it will constitute a guarantee that
we will continue the war until the full and complete victory of
fascism and that they will guarantee the up till now gains of our
people and more will be won.

You shouted a lot about the death penalty regarding the traitors and
the collaborationists and exploiters of the people in the years of the
occupation. When we didn't have the capacity of judging them we killed
them. Later on we judged them in military tribunals. Now all those we
have arrested we will hand over to justice. There exists now the legal
government and this will decide for all. Don’t shout therefore. They
will be judged and condemned. It won’t have a big importance.

It will have great importance if you judge and condemn to death, the
dominant people, the regime which creates such scumbags.

Tomorrow we will go for elections. The first attack in the plebiscite
must be the irrevocable condemnation of friendly royalism and the
establishment of democracy.

Why have we turned with so much hatred against the King?

1. As first of all he isn't Greek.
2. They brought him here with the fake plebiscite of 1935.
3. As he is a person who disavowed his word. He squashed the
constitution of 1911 and imposed the fifth-columnist Giannis Metaxas
as dictator.
4. As he left all the incapable and fifth-columnist generals and
ministers to betray us in the war in Albania and to subjugate the
country.
5. Finally during our national disaster instead of staying here in
1941 to sacrifice himself as another Kodros of Athens he abandoned us.

If he was good he should have stayed here and instead of Aris
Velouhiotis and I dont know who else going to the mountains he should
have organised the struggle and to be by deed a King and our leader.
With his stance he abandoned essentially and typically his right to be
on the throne in Greece.

That for sure for him personally and independently from our desires
and that we don’t need any throne, but democracy for Greece to go
forward.

We respect the popular will.
The second attack should be given to the elections which will clear
the establishment of our country. As for us our only desire is that we
become servants of the people. That is why we will respect your wishes
whatever that may be.

But we have these demands: For the people to vote without influence
and for them to respect the will of the people.

If these demands aren't carried out, then we promise you that we will
go the mountains again. But I am sure these things won’t happen. As
our people have now got back their self-control. He was tried and woke
up. He will follow the path which we show and which only interest him.

With this desire I ask you to shout:







Long live our dominant people!

Kornilios Sunshine
9th October 2011, 20:06
Nice one,re :D!Important to say,that today KKE organised an event about the rehabiliation of his memory in Lamia.

Delenda Carthago
9th October 2011, 20:08
Nice one,re :D!Important to say,that today KKE organised an event about the rehabiliation of his memory in Lamia.
In order for you to say that, you have to explain to people that dont know why a rehabilitation is needed and what does that mean for KKE today.

Kornilios Sunshine
9th October 2011, 20:28
In order for you to say that, you have to explain to people that dont know why a rehabilitation is needed and what does that mean for KKE today.
Nah, it will "steal the show" of the whole thread which contains the speech. :P