Log in

View Full Version : Fun With Tanks



Rusty Shackleford
22nd September 2011, 07:05
I'm bringing tankie back.

poLf9Qamnpk

P5aWAW2hea4

Susurrus
22nd September 2011, 08:01
http://fc07.deviantart.net/fs43/f/2009/069/0/a/L4D__Tank__s_Tea_Time_by_wibblethefish.jpg

Rusty Shackleford
22nd September 2011, 08:15
:lol:

EvilRedGuy
22nd September 2011, 14:29
http://i452.photobucket.com/albums/qq241/ukpro/Grot%20Tanks/my_little_tankie.jpg

Rss
22nd September 2011, 14:38
I'm bringing tankie back.

poLf9Qamnpk

P5aWAW2hea4

:lol: That first video brings back some good memories.

Triple A
22nd September 2011, 18:36
http://images.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/10176928.jpg

ColonelCossack
22nd September 2011, 19:03
http://i452.photobucket.com/albums/qq241/ukpro/Grot%20Tanks/my_little_tankie.jpg

They're so cute! :lol:

Triple A
22nd September 2011, 21:07
Btw I myself made a panzer and a merkava tanks.
Not real thanks tough.:)

Susurrus
22nd September 2011, 22:27
http://ravenrepublic.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/flying_tank.jpg
http://img2.moonbuggy.org/imgstore/flying-anti-tank.jpg

Rusty Shackleford
22nd September 2011, 23:01
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/Killen-Strait.jpg

imagine trying to drive this after a nice rain in soft soil.

Susurrus
23rd September 2011, 00:43
imagine trying to drive this after a nice rain in soft soil.

Solution: http://horna.kicks-ass.net/~setae/kuvat/irc-images/2008-01/21/zil-2906.jpeg


afJ18eJeNgU

Dzerzhinsky's Ghost
23rd September 2011, 01:04
http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/jp_fttank/jp_ft_tank_flamethrower_wwii_ww2_japanese.jpg
http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/jp_fttank/jp_ft_tank_flamethrower_sideview_japanese.jpg
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/landmine-dod-panther.jpg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LrjzBLpz6yE/TaKgNtsFdmI/AAAAAAAAGJ0/MIuoa_f6LsE/s1600/britain-tanks-ww1.jpg
http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/france/Fra-FCMF1.jpg
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/08/133.jpg
http://www.dday-overlord.com/img/chars/char_sherman_crab.jpg

EvilRedGuy
23rd September 2011, 13:55
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2076/1878664364_07be7816cb.jpg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ZjVFi6kKVgQ/TZB4OSEnu2I/AAAAAAAAAcA/aiKi5JeaEt4/s640/clip_image002_thumb.jpg
http://sobchak.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/gioiello1.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/159/357549634_56b58859d3.jpg


:tt2:

Rusty Shackleford
23rd September 2011, 17:36
lol top one is terrible editing.

bcbm
24th September 2011, 21:55
CbFcc-_tWNQ

Sasha
24th September 2011, 22:38
-jgrpUbCtvE

ÑóẊîöʼn
25th September 2011, 06:25
Did someone say tanks? I FUCKING LOVE TANKS

http://www.revleft.com/vb/picture.php?albumid=202&pictureid=3027

http://www.revleft.com/vb/picture.php?albumid=202&pictureid=1324

http://www.revleft.com/vb/picture.php?albumid=202&pictureid=3380

http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j99/NoXion604/Imperator_SHBT_class_by_Doc_Evilona.png

http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j99/NoXion604/landbb380gz.jpg

http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j99/NoXion604/Landcrawler_Delta_Complete_by_Doc_E.png

Rusty Shackleford
25th September 2011, 06:45
those.... tanks...



so useless :lol:

EvilRedGuy
25th September 2011, 12:47
Beats them all.


http://dragyoutohell.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/wtf-pics-tank-baby.jpg

Rusty Shackleford
25th September 2011, 17:40
If you ever played GTA III
EC_lj1Ns3dk

-kkP2gZH2fg

ÑóẊîöʼn
25th September 2011, 18:35
those.... tanks...

so useless :lol:

How are they useless? How are we defining "usefulness" here?

Rusty Shackleford
25th September 2011, 18:37
How are they useless? How are we defining "usefulness" here?
oh im just messing around. but if were gonna be serious. imagine how slow and large they are.

ÑóẊîöʼn
25th September 2011, 19:27
oh im just messing around. but if were gonna be serious. imagine how slow and large they are.

Well, it's a question of trade-offs, isn't it? A tank the size of a city block may not be the fastest or most maneuverable unit on the battlefield, but their sheer size enables one to give them a nuclear reactor or several for plenty of raw power, armour thicker than most tanks are tall, as well as literal kilotons of armament. They're the Mighty Glaciers (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MightyGlacier) of the armoured vehicle world.

Also, unlike normal-sized tanks, such units are large enough to justify having their own integrated air defences, although as with all armoured vehicles, it's generally a bad idea to send them out completely unsupported.

If you can spare the resources and leap the technical hurdles, then I reckon land battleships can be potent psychological weapons - the first glimpse of one of these iron mountains of death rumbling across the battlefield, smashing aside everything in its path, is bound to cause consternation among even seasoned soldiers. Then they'll bloody shit themselves when they see the armoured behemoth shrug off a couple of tactical nuclear weapons (or the equivalent in conventional fire), before carrying on.

Leonid Brozhnev
25th September 2011, 21:16
http://www.majhost.com/gallery/AsiniDiabolica/Things/forum2.jpg

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/AsiniDiabolica/Things/t34764201.jpg

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/AsiniDiabolica/Things/kolor1a_poprawa_male2.jpg

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/AsiniDiabolica/Things/t72m1.jpg

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/AsiniDiabolica/Things/russian_land_battleship_kv_vi_by_vonbrrr-d2yk6b3.jpg

^No, that never existed, but Tankies rejoice!

http://www.majhost.com/gallery/AsiniDiabolica/Things/t44hungary.jpg

Rusty Shackleford
26th September 2011, 01:48
Well, it's a question of trade-offs, isn't it? A tank the size of a city block may not be the fastest or most maneuverable unit on the battlefield, but their sheer size enables one to give them a nuclear reactor or several for plenty of raw power, armour thicker than most tanks are tall, as well as literal kilotons of armament. They're the Mighty Glaciers (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/MightyGlacier) of the armoured vehicle world.

Also, unlike normal-sized tanks, such units are large enough to justify having their own integrated air defences, although as with all armoured vehicles, it's generally a bad idea to send them out completely unsupported.

If you can spare the resources and leap the technical hurdles, then I reckon land battleships can be potent psychological weapons - the first glimpse of one of these iron mountains of death rumbling across the battlefield, smashing aside everything in its path, is bound to cause consternation among even seasoned soldiers. Then they'll bloody shit themselves when they see the armoured behemoth shrug off a couple of tactical nuclear weapons (or the equivalent in conventional fire), before carrying on.


Im going to liken it to this. Think of the Bismarck-class battleships. They were fucking massive but really, they didnt achieve much in combat. The first one went on a rampage through the north sea and the north atlantic and then got sunk a ways out of Brest and the second got bombed to shit in 1944.

Looking at the combat records of the Bismarck it only made one kill on the British "Hood" battleship. It did manage to force "Prince of Wales" battleship to withdraw before it ended up getting annihilated a few days later.

the second Bismarck class ship "Tripitz" got whacked pretty fast. ended up capsizing.

Looks like they probably weren't supported well though. only a few submarines and destroyers and supply ships.

Pavlov's House Party
1st October 2011, 15:49
Im going to liken it to this. Think of the Bismarck-class battleships. They were fucking massive but really, they didnt achieve much in combat. The first one went on a rampage through the north sea and the north atlantic and then got sunk a ways out of Brest and the second got bombed to shit in 1944.

Looking at the combat records of the Bismarck it only made one kill on the British "Hood" battleship. It did manage to force "Prince of Wales" battleship to withdraw before it ended up getting annihilated a few days later.

the second Bismarck class ship "Tripitz" got whacked pretty fast. ended up capsizing.

Looks like they probably weren't supported well though. only a few submarines and destroyers and supply ships.

I'm thinking more along the lines of what happened to the Japanese battleship Yamato - the heaviest armed ship ever constructed. On paper it could have destroyed any ship that it encountered, but ended up being sunk by torpedo-bombers from an American aircraft carrier.

Susurrus
2nd October 2011, 04:32
http://images.wikia.com/cnc/images/f/f4/Red_Alert_3_Apoc_Tank.jpg

Nothing Human Is Alien
2nd October 2011, 04:54
http://www.atarimania.com/2600/boxes/hi_res/tanks_but_no_tanks_cart.jpg

ВАЛТЕР
2nd October 2011, 12:08
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/05/09/pail257460.jpg

Someone say something about tanks?

Rusty Shackleford
3rd October 2011, 02:35
http://www.atarimania.com/2600/boxes/hi_res/tanks_but_no_tanks_cart.jpg
ahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Lenina Rosenweg
3rd October 2011, 05:04
I wish I could tank these posts. I think the thread is below quota on T 34s though.

Rusty Shackleford
3rd October 2011, 06:27
I wish I could tank these posts. I think the thread is below quota on T 34s though.
I guess ill indulge you.


The best advertisement ever.
JwFEaM7L7vY