without adjectives

[freedomist6]

that is answer no thing can fit all people, capitalists can have capitalism, communists can have communism, republicans can have republics, ETC

[Kamos]

A very idea.

(In other words, what?)

[xub3rn00dlex]

A very idea.

(In other words, what?)

I believe he meant he solved our crisis.

[ColonelCossack]

I am :confused:

HA HA HA

Do smilies count?

[Le Rouge]

And the point of this is???

By the way, my troll detector just went mad.. not sure why though.

[xub3rn00dlex]

And the point of this is???

By the way, my troll detector just went mad.. not sure why though.

Funny cause my troll senses are all a tingle:scared:

http://media.comicvine.com/uploads/9/97009/1946663-314154_1471011_my_troll_sense_is_tingling_super_th umb_super.jpg

[¿Que?]

The very existence of capitalism relies on the ability for profits to increase, that is to expand its reach. If capital didn't grow and reach out to new areas and industries then it wouldn't really be capitalism. So why don't the capitalists let us have our communism?

(btw this thread does seem rather trollish)

[ColonelCossack]

Is he/she* saying that people should keep to their own?

*I'm gonna start calling people "this comrade" because it's gender neutral. So that should read, "Is this comrade saying people should keep to their own". But then if they say that then they aren't really comrades, are they... sounds like an argument fascists use.

The conclusion: trollololololol

[DarkPast]

@OP: lolwut?

[Revolution starts with U]

The history of capitalist pretty plainly shows that capitalists will kill you if it will generate them greater profits. Anarchy w/o adjectives sounds good.. kinda. But I have little faith it would last 50 years before some ancap insurance agency pulled a false flag operation in order to garner support for the invasion of our commune.

[RGacky3]

BTW both Capitalists and socialists believe in republics.

[Commissar Rykov]

DMoWt0wnlUw
Jim make it stop.