Log in

View Full Version : Sarah Palin's new "pro-labor" rhetoric



redhotpoker
8th September 2011, 18:42
A dangerous development?


In my speech on Saturday in Iowa, I said: “Between bailouts for Wall Street cronies and stimulus projects for union bosses’ security and ‘green energy’ giveaways, [Barack Obama] took care of his friends. And now they’re on course to raise a billion dollars for his re-election bid so that they can do it all over again.” This was shamefully on display yesterday at President Obama’s taxpayer-funded campaign rally in Detroit. In introducing the President, Teamsters President James Hoffa represented precisely what I was talking about as he declared war on concerned independent Americans and on the freshman members we sent to Congress last November by saying, “Let’s take these son-of-a-*****es out!”

What I say now, I say as a proud former union member and the wife, daughter, and sister of union members. So, as a former card-carrying IBEW sister married to a proud former Laborers, IBEW, and later USW member, please hear me out. What I have to say is for the hard working, patriotic, selfless union brothers and sisters in Michigan and throughout our country: Please don’t be taken in by union bosses’ thuggery like Jim Hoffa represented yesterday. Union bosses like this do not have your best interests at heart. What they care about is their own power and re-electing their friend Barack Obama so he will take care of them to the detriment of everyone else.

To the same degree Americans are concerned about irresponsible, greedy corporate execs who got cushy bonuses from taxpayer-funded bailouts, we should also be concerned about greedy union bosses who are willing to tank our economy just to protect their own power. As union history shows, power and greed corrupt. Just because you claim to represent union members doesn’t mean you are on the side of the angels. The greed of too many of these union bosses has all but destroyed the labor movement in this country, helped chase away our jobs, and is killing the American dream.

To see where this leads, look at what’s happening to the working class in our industrialized cities. These cities are going to hell in a hand basket thanks to corruption, crony capitalism, and the union bosses’ greed. The union bosses derive their power from your union dues and their promise to deliver your votes to whichever politician they’re in bed with. They get their power from you, and yet their actions ultimately hurt you. They’re chasing American industry offshore by making outrageous, economically illogical demands that they know will never work. And now that they’ve chased jobs out of union states, they’re trying to chase them out of right-to-work states like South Carolina, so eventually the jobs will leave America altogether. But these union bosses will still figure out a way to keep their gig, and so will their politically aligned corporate friends. As long as these big corporations have a good crony capitalist in the White House, they can rely on DC to bail them out until the whole system goes bankrupt, which, I am afraid, is not very far off. When big government, big business, and big union bosses collude together, they get government to maximize their own interests against those of the rest of the country.

So, now these union bosses are desperately trying to cast the grassroots Tea Party Movement as being “against the workingman.” How outrageously wrong this unapologetic Jim Hoffa is, for the people’s movement is the real movement for working class men and women. It’s rooted in real solidarity, and not special interests and corporate kickbacks. It represents the needed reform that will empower workers and job creators. We stand with the little guy against the corruption and influence peddling of those who collude to grease the wheels of government power.

This collusion is at the heart of Obama’s economic vision for America. In practice it is socialism for the very rich and the very poor, but a brutal form of capitalism for the rest of us. It is socialism for the very poor who are reduced to a degrading perpetual dependence on a near-bankrupt centralized government to provide their every need, while at the same time robbing them of that which brings fulfillment and success – the life-affirming pride that comes from taking responsibility for your own destiny and building a better life through self-initiative and work ethic. And Obama’s vision is socialism via crony capitalism for the very rich who continue to get bailouts, debt-ridden “stimulus” funds, and special favors that allow them to waive off or help draft the burdensome regulations that act as a boot on the neck to small business owners who don’t have the same friends in high places. And where does this collusion leave working class Americans and the small business owners who create 70% of the jobs in this country? Out in the cold. It’s you and your children who are left paying for the cronyism of Obama and our permanent political class in DC.

Ask yourself if the folks you heard demonize concerned, independent Americans yesterday really speak for the working class when they’re all too happy to burden your families with the bill to bail out the President’s friends on Wall Street.

We should not forget that for all his lofty rhetoric, President Obama is a Chicago politician. Graft, cronyism, and quid pro quo are the well-known methods of an infamous Chicago political machine, of which Barack Obama emerged. This corruption isn’t just the result of a few bad apples. It’s the nature of a skewed system that’s typical of one not allowing a level playing field. If one desires opportunity for all, then the only solution is sudden and relentless reform. I know of what I speak. I too served in public office in a state that had a corruption problem. The difference is that I fought the corrupt political machine. Barack Obama used the machine in his state to advance. He never challenged it. And he’s evidently brought the same Chicago “pay-to-play” practices to the White House.

It’s sad to see much of the labor movement fall lock step behind a President whom Hoffa calls upon to partner in “waging war” against patriotic Americans. I will never forget that as a governor, in trying to be a friend to the working men and women in our unions, I gave a speech on August 27, 2008, at the annual AFL-CIO meeting in Anchorage. There, union members humbled me with a standing ovation for fighting the corruption in Alaska and for bringing parties together for progress on energy development projects. Then just two days later I landed on the national stage as John McCain’s running mate, and the union leadership turned on me from that day forward even though I had not changed one iota in my plans, principles, vision, and commitment to jobs for working class Americans. The only difference was I was challenging the politician the union bosses were committed to electing. It was almost comical, this lesson learned with their new spots revealed so quickly.

Recently someone commented: “I’m a union member. I’ve been a Democrat all my life. Now I’ll vote for anyone with a plan to save America.” I know what that person is feeling. I want all good union brothers and sisters to know that there is an alternative. The grassroots, independent Tea Party Movement articulates a real alternative rooted in free men and free markets, not the cronyism of Barack Obama and the permanent political class in DC. Their cronyism is why we have no job growth, massive unsustainable debt, and a housing market in the tank. Too many politicians are simply addressing the economic symptoms instead of fighting the underlying disease. The path forward is through reform. On Saturday, I outlined some ideas about that reform, and I will continue to do so.

In the meantime, good union brothers and sisters, don’t let Hoffa tell you what to do. He doesn’t represent the real interests of working men and women. He’s not doing you any favors. He’s just living off your paychecks.

- Sarah Palin

Vladimir Innit Lenin
8th September 2011, 19:36
No, she's an idiot. It's not like this is some deep ideological turn. She's too stupid to be able to pass this off as sincere for any period of time.

Whilst she scares the shit out of me, i've come to realise and believe that she really is just too stupid and perhaps too extreme (as Bachmann is) to get near the Presidency.

Dzerzhinsky's Ghost
8th September 2011, 19:42
I believe advocating the participation in bourgeois elections and literally becoming bourgeois yourself means you've crossed the class line sister, sorry.

redhotpoker
8th September 2011, 21:00
No, she's an idiot. It's not like this is some deep ideological turn. She's too stupid to be able to pass this off as sincere for any period of time.

Whilst she scares the shit out of me, i've come to realise and believe that she really is just too stupid and perhaps too extreme (as Bachmann is) to get near the Presidency.
I dont think "Sarah Palin is a moron" is a good official position to have. Remember ruling class politicians most of the time represent the current sentiments held by one or more sections of the ruling class. Personaly I think this may be the beginning of the right-wing trying to co-op the labor movement as a form of union busting.

Lacrimi de Chiciură
8th September 2011, 21:07
I believe advocating the participation in bourgeois elections and literally becoming bourgeois yourself means you've crossed the class line sister, sorry.

Are you sure you're a Marxist-Leninist? Because Lenin advocated participation in bourgeois elections.


To attempt to "circumvent" this difficulty by "skipping" the arduous job of utilising reactionary parliaments for revolutionary purposes is absolutely childish. You want to create a new society, yet you fear the difficulties involved in forming a good parliamentary group made up of convinced, devoted and heroic Communists, in a reactionary parliament! Is that not childish? If Karl Liebknecht in Germany and Z. H?glund in Sweden were able, even without mass support from below, to set examples of the truly revolutionary utilisation of reactionary parliaments, why should a rapidly growing revolutionary mass party, in the midst of the post-war disillusionment and embitterment of the masses, be unable to forge a communist group in the worst of parliaments? It is because, in Western Europe, the backward masses of the workers and—to an even greater degree—of the small peasants are much more imbued with bourgeois-democratic and parliamentary prejudices than they were in Russia because of that, it is only from within such institutions as bourgeois parliaments that Communists can (and must) wage a long and persistent struggle, undaunted by any difficulties, to expose, dispel and overcome these prejudices. Vladimir Lenin's Left-Wing Communism: an Infantile Disorder / Should we Participate in Bourgeois Parliaments? (http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1920/lwc/ch07.htm)

Ocean Seal
8th September 2011, 21:16
Right wing "pro labor" policies have always existed and will continue to exist up to the moment of the revolution. Remember the national syndicalists? But she takes it a step further. Workers fight against your own interests because the unions don't represent you, the Tea party does, and the large capitalists do as well.

Jose Gracchus
8th September 2011, 21:19
I wonder if all we need is bootstraps and free markets, how is it we needed and created those unions she hypocritically attempts to sop to here, in the first place?

In any case looks to me one of her writers simply found 'producerism' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Producerism) (the traditional populist ideology of the class-collaborationists working among the white working class in the U.S.; the original 'bottom-feeders' in the schema can be read transparently enough as 'blacks and foriegners') and regurgitated its elements into this thinly-veiled groping for authenticity.

Dzerzhinsky's Ghost
8th September 2011, 21:25
Are you sure you're a Marxist-Leninist? Because Lenin advocated participation in bourgeois elections.


Point taken, I'll have to go back and re-evaluate things however I do agree with comrade Redhotpoker's assessment; this is troubling.

This isn't as if a section of the left or more progressive bourgeois parties is trying to cater to and or work with the labor movement/proletariat this is the right, particularly the radicalized right of the so called 'Tea Party.' Further, I would still say that by becoming bourgeois herself, allying herself with numerous reactionary parties and groups and so on definetely means that Ms. Palin has crossed the class line and is definetely not one of us.

RadioRaheem84
9th September 2011, 01:55
Class collaboration talk. This was all the rage after WWI and the Great Depression. Ideas of class struggle were fought with notions that illustrated the need for classes in civilization. Everyone does there part or whatnot.

This was prevalent in the democracies as well as the fascist states.

Whenever a politician talks like this it's to stem the rising tide of class antagonisms.

Nothing Human Is Alien
9th September 2011, 09:58
PATCO endorsed Ronald Reagan for president... right before he smashed their strike and destroyed their union.