RGacky3
8th September 2011, 08:59
dwJ1lh8-FBY
Deflation, its obvious, but Sam explains it very clearly.
When the value of money goes up and up, people will not want to spend money, thus money does'nt move, people get fired, and money concentrates more and more.
The whole poing of people wanting a gold standard is that it has some mystical "real value," but when you look at the actual economics of it, its a disasterous idea that limits growth and infact contracts it.
Hell I'd go so far as to say the ancient eygptrian/sumarian system of sheckels of grain is a better system, because it least it grows with the economy.
So it would be smarter to go to a grain based currency than a gold, but both are silly.
Deflation, its obvious, but Sam explains it very clearly.
When the value of money goes up and up, people will not want to spend money, thus money does'nt move, people get fired, and money concentrates more and more.
The whole poing of people wanting a gold standard is that it has some mystical "real value," but when you look at the actual economics of it, its a disasterous idea that limits growth and infact contracts it.
Hell I'd go so far as to say the ancient eygptrian/sumarian system of sheckels of grain is a better system, because it least it grows with the economy.
So it would be smarter to go to a grain based currency than a gold, but both are silly.