Log in

View Full Version : Annoying Internet Tea Partiers



DinodudeEpic
27th August 2011, 20:00
Everywhere I go in political places in the internet, I see ONLY Tea Partiers who believe Liberalism is authoritarian, Socialism means dictatorship, and that Conservatism means liberty. (Although the word 'Liberal' means looseness, freedom, and such.) I'm also sick and tired of whining Tea Partiers screaming about how Obama has destroyed democracy in the USA. (Then, why fight for the US government?)

They also dress themselves up as libertarians, and that they're the ones who are socially open. Then, I see Tea Partiers compare the liberals to the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Maoist China, and even Tories(British Conservatives). Even though, the Tea Party actually has more in common with the Tories and Nazi Germany then the latter two have with liberals.

Every where I look, I see only news about how the Tea Party is 'of the People' and how they are fighting against the liberal elitists. Although, the Tea Party has support amongst....THE FREAKING ELITE! I then hear about how the Tea Party is for liberty, less taxes, and less government spending. Then, why is there less rights in the states runned by the Tea Party? Why is there more non-income taxes being proposed by Tea Partiers? Why is there increased government spending in the military?

In total, I'm sick and tired of seeing stupid and idiotic internet comments written by Tea Partiers who don't know shit about the world around them. They are devoid of intellect, are already repeated a million times, and make people stupider after they read them.

Nox
27th August 2011, 20:03
nWNho8g0lsU

rockstars must die
27th August 2011, 20:06
i hate them and have punched a couple in face before. funny shit

The Douche
27th August 2011, 20:14
Where have they been compared to the conservative party in Britain?

DinodudeEpic
27th August 2011, 20:18
Well, I was reading the comments of a new article, only to find a comment that says that the American Revolutionaries are like Tea Partiers and the Tories are like Liberals.....Really stupid shit.

Bud Struggle
27th August 2011, 20:34
I find that the Tea Partiers are truly anti-American.

RichardAWilson
27th August 2011, 20:54
They're not anti-American, they're just plain dumb cattle being led around by billionaires like the Koch Brothers.

ComradeMan
27th August 2011, 21:00
I find that the Tea Partiers are truly anti-American.

Do they hate apple pie and refuse to drink (bad) coffee? :D

Seriously, I just don't "get" the Tea Party to be honest.

Bud Struggle
27th August 2011, 21:06
They're not anti-American, they're just plain dumb cattle being led around by billionaires like the Koch Brothers. If they don't want to pay taxes, they shouldn't have to. Neither should they have to drive on our roads and highways, send their children to our schools, call our police when they're victimized, call our fire departments when their homes are on fire, etc.

They are anti-American. America is Commonwealth--a joint venture of free and equal citizens working together to form a more perfect union.

It's east to choose--I want roads and schools, I don't want welfare and prisoner's rights. It will save us plenty of money. But that's not what a commo wealth is all about. Capitalist America is no less (in theory) a free and fair society than what all you Commies and Anarchists are preaching about--different economic system--but the same freedoms the same responsibilities. It's pretty obvious those American freedoms AND RESPONSIBILITIES have been compromised but people like the Tea Partiers.

That is anti-American.

RichardAWilson
27th August 2011, 21:08
The Tea Party's main mantra revolves around taxation: Instead of don't tread on me, their motto is "Don't Tax Me." Fine and good. When you're robbed on a street corner, don't call the police. Don't send your children to public school. Don't call 911 when your house is on fire. Don't drive on public roads and highways. Don't go to public parks. Don't borrow books from the library.

Bud Struggle
27th August 2011, 21:15
The Tea Party's main mantra revolves around taxation: Instead of don't tread on me, their motto is "Don't Tax Me." Fine and good. When you're robbed on a street corner, don't call the police. Don't send your children to public school. Don't call 911 when your house is on fire. Don't drive on public roads and highways. Don't go to public parks. Don't borrow books from the library.

Yea. So, if they don't want to participate in America--then they should LEAVE.

Maybe we should deport Tea Partiers. Let's keep the undocumented Mexicans who are actually adding to American wealth and culture and deport the Tea Partiers who want to add nothing to America.

Can't get easier than that.

RedMarxist
27th August 2011, 21:38
They also happen to be fundamental Christians-at least most of them.

Fundamentalists make me so sick. to quote Ralph from the Simpsons:

Ralph "Are the Oceans God's tears"

teacher: "Yes, Ralph"

Ralph: "Yay!"

Ralph-the mindset of most Conservative Fundamentalist Christians. never mind the glaring holes in "Biblical History", as long as the Oceans are God's tears, then it's all OK. :crying:-God is crying!

Oh ya, and the husband of Michelle Bachman thinks that he can "Pray The Gay Away(trademark)". WTF!

I'm sick of them trying to "rehabilitate" Gays!

I'm sick of their[Tea Party Members] stupid rhetoric about the Bourgeois American Revolution! Sure, it was a big deal, and I admire such figures as George Washington and Jefferson, but you don't have to form personality cults around those guys! 1776 has been exploited by the Tea Party for patriotic purposes only. What ever significance and dignity it had is gone.

I'm also sick of the Rich. Yes, Rich with a capital "R". Every time they hand out charity money its a big deal in the mainstream medial-while millions of Americans don't have jobs, thousands are without homes, and people in Appalachia slave away in the mines.

And yet...I feel powerless to stop it. What is the point of being a Communist if no one gives a shit about your ideology anyway?

ComradeMan
27th August 2011, 21:44
...

It seems that most things in America become "fundamental" in one sense or another, even the pizza ends up extreme.

Christian fundamentalism, black hebrew israelite fundamentalism, radical this, radical that- pastors wanting to burn the Qu'ran, everything big and oversized and extreme. I think America needs to drink more camomile tea to be honest.

DinodudeEpic
27th August 2011, 21:55
I mostly made this thread due to snobby internet commenters who think they are right about everything and are rebelling against the evil Orwellian dictatorship. And, the vast horde of tea partier political cartoons.

There is SO many of them that I keep on getting sick and tired of them. I just want to give them pacifiers so they can stop crying like nihilistic babies. :sneaky: Ok, I may had taken it a bit too far, but it really is bugging me.

For the Tea Partiers: You are NOT fighters for liberty, you are NOT bipartisan, you are NOT socially liberal libertarians, you are NOT classical liberals, the founding fathers are NOT conservatives, and the Tea Party is NOT anti-elitist.

(Sorry for the rage, I'm just blown out of my mind by Tea Partier stupidity and historical revisionism.)

RichardAWilson
28th August 2011, 04:06
Thomas Jefferson and George Washington were rich, slave owning white men that wanted to establish a system that'd favor them. America had nothing to do with freedom. Women still didn't have a voice and people of color were treated as subhuman. If that's the definition of "freedom," I'd hate like hell to read the definition of oppression. In Britain, they were nobodies. In America, they were able to become rich land and slave owners.

DinodudeEpic
28th August 2011, 04:37
It is relative to period of time that made America free. Women having no voice, well no other country had that at 1776. People of color being maltreated, EVERY single country at the time had persecuted people of different ethnicity. What America did have was republican government, freedom of religion (the Dutch and British had this to a lesser extent.), and freedom of speech. Note that this doesn't make America inherently free or the freest country either, it did have it's own share of oppressive aspects, but the USA was the bastion of liberalism worldwide until the 1980s. (Except for the South, which pretty much is the conservative base of operations in the country.)

Also, Thomas Jefferson actually wanted to abolish slavery (Hypocrisy much?), but his state didn't allow him to abolish it. George Washington personally hated slavery, but he made laws helping it. (More hypocrisy.)

In total, the American Revolution was actually very revolutionary for it's time. (The world was ruled by authoritarian feudal monarchies.) It only got diluted when the French Revolution came, which was helped by the American Revolution, crashing down upon the Bourbon swine. (Note that I used a part of the phrase, 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity' in my sig.)

But, everyone knows that the best revolution ever was the 2nd French Revolution.

RichardAWilson
28th August 2011, 05:20
I couldn't agree more. During the Bush Administration, Conservatives screamed "America, love it or leave it." Well, that's what we should say to them. Love it, or move to Somalia.

Le Rouge
28th August 2011, 05:38
But, everyone knows that the best revolution ever was the 2nd French Revolution.

Indeed. :) If nobody had crushed the revolution, France would have been the first socialist contry.

Edit : Do you know that it happened 2 days after the publication of the Communist Manifesto?

RichardAWilson
28th August 2011, 05:44
It was the only socialist country by Marxian definition. The closest thing that we've come to the Paris Commune is Modern Scandinavia. (I.e. Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden).

Xenophiliac
28th August 2011, 06:03
This is a bit of a digression, but could this “movement” have picked a more disrespectful name for themselves? They have adopted a name that conjures in the mind an iconic and principled protest against unfair taxation in an effort to promote their racist and ultra-conservative ideologies.

That said they are also cowards. The original taxes on tea levied by the King of Britain were nothing to the insane taxation of the modern United States; yet these large talking bigots who are so “oppressed” by multiculturalism and taxation lack the vigor and courage of their namesake when it comes to asserting their beliefs in any kind of substantial way.

Le Rouge
28th August 2011, 06:15
Yea. So, if they don't want to participate in America--then they should LEAVE.

Maybe we should deport Tea Partiers. Let's keep the undocumented Mexicans who are actually adding to American wealth and culture and deport the Tea Partiers who want to add nothing to America.

Can't get easier than that.

Holy shit! No thanks. Keep them in america. Nobody want them.

Le Rouge
28th August 2011, 06:21
It was the only socialist country by Marxian definition. The closest thing that we've come to the Paris Commune is Modern Scandinavia. (I.e. Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden).

Paris commune =/= 2nd french revolution.

Paris commune is the best revolution ever.
2nd french revolution is the second best

RichardAWilson
28th August 2011, 06:28
Well, we could let them have a Tea Party Paradise in Montana?

The Douche
28th August 2011, 06:35
Well, I was reading the comments of a new article, only to find a comment that says that the American Revolutionaries are like Tea Partiers and the Tories are like Liberals.....Really stupid shit.

"Tories" in the context of the american revolution refers to the colonists who remained loyal to/fought for the British.;)

DinodudeEpic
28th August 2011, 15:43
Of course, Tory still meant conservative, as the loyalists are made up of the conservative sections of the Colonial population. Fighting for a monarch against one of the world's first liberal revolutions is not Liberalism. Also, the Tories were a reactionary faction in the British parliament. (who advocated absolute monarchy.)

The only difference between the Tories from before and the Tories of now is that the latter became more laissez-faire and less reactionary.

The Douche
28th August 2011, 15:51
Of course, Tory still meant conservative, as the loyalists are made up of the conservative sections of the Colonial population. Fighting for a monarch against one of the world's first liberal revolutions is not Liberalism. Also, the Tories were a reactionary faction in the British parliament. (who advocated absolute monarchy.)

The only difference between the Tories from before and the Tories of now is that the latter became more laissez-faire and less reactionary.

If you think the tea party is comparing liberals to british conservatives you are wrong.

Che a chara
28th August 2011, 16:38
The Tea Party are the definition of xenophobia. They are opposed to even the slightest change and deviation from their own perception of traditional, conservative [distorted] Christian beliefs. They have no intention of evolving, hence their demonisation of progressivism and inclusiveness.

They like to take, take, take and give back as little as possible, i mean their anti-tax stance is just insane.

DinodudeEpic
28th August 2011, 16:44
It was just an internet comment. I never said "The ENTIRE tea party said that liberals=british conservatives". I said that an internet comment made by some Tea Partier doche bag said that. And that wasn't the only case of stupid Tea Partier comments, I see HUNDREDS of them per online news article. (In mainstream sites.)

The movement isn't really coherent at all. Let's be populists, but the elite population is our main supporter. Let's be liberty-lovers, but let's take away various rights out of the population. Well, more like a con-scheme.

The Douche
29th August 2011, 04:33
It was just an internet comment. I never said "The ENTIRE tea party said that liberals=british conservatives". I said that an internet comment made by some Tea Partier doche bag said that. And that wasn't the only case of stupid Tea Partier comments, I see HUNDREDS of them per online news article. (In mainstream sites.)

The movement isn't really coherent at all. Let's be populists, but the elite population is our main supporter. Let's be liberty-lovers, but let's take away various rights out of the population. Well, more like a con-scheme.

Yeah, you're still confusing "tories" in reference to the american revolution and "tories" in reference to british politics. They're not the same. The tea party are classical liberals, like the tories of current british politics. They think modern liberals are "elitists" like the monarchist tories of the american revolution.