Log in

View Full Version : Cherokee Nation Expels Descendants Of Tribe's Black Slaves



Princess Luna
27th August 2011, 04:46
After a long legal fight, the Cherokee nation ousted thousands of descendants of black slaves who had long been official members of the tribe.
The Cherokee Supreme Court (the tribe is a sovereign nation) ruled this week a 2007 constitutional amendment that required Cherokee blood in order to belong to the tribe could stand.
"This is racism and apartheid in the 21st century," Marilyn Vann, the lead plaintiff in the case and a freedman leader, told Reuters.
The controversy over the freedmen's status is at least in part about money. The Cherokee nation, the second-largest Native American tribe in the country, receives money from the federal government and earns money from its stake in the lucrative gambling industry, which totaled $26.4 billion for all tribes in 2009. In the run-up to the 2007 amendment vote, some proponents of expelling the freedmen suggested that more blacks might apply for membership to receive tribal money.
In the 1800s, the U.S. government passed a law forcing members of the Cherokee nation from their ancestral lands in the Deep South to make room for white settlers. The Cherokee -- as well as their black slaves -- were forcibly marched west of the Mississippi River to the Oklahoma territory during the "Trail of Tears," resulting in the deaths of thousands of Native Americans.
After the Civil War, the Cherokee formally admitted by treaty their slaves' descendants into the nation.
Before the 2007 passage of the amendment, some descendants of the freedmen said the vote on their status within the nation expressed a desire by many tribe members to paper over their slave-owning past. But the tribe’s leadership disagreed. "It's a basic, inherent right to determine our own citizenry," a Cherokee leader told the Washington Post. "We paid very dearly for those rights."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/25/cherokee-nations-expels-d_n_936930.html
FUCK THE CHEROKEE LEADERSHIP!!
Before the trail of tears they were just as much scum as any white-man. owning huge plantations with slaves and repeating massive profits from the explotation of poor indians. It's clear 250 years hasn't changed anything

Dumb
27th August 2011, 05:25
Yeah, sadly we were probably the biggest sell-outs of any tribe that comes to mind. Then again, the whole issue of the indigenous tribes is the most obvious, most invisible system of apartheid you will find.

Rhizome
1st September 2011, 05:37
Before the trail of tears they were just as much scum as any white-man.

Uh, no.

Tenka
1st September 2011, 11:31
Uh, no.
How not so?

Sasha
1st September 2011, 12:08
"look, we can be opportunistic bigots too!"

Rhizome
3rd September 2011, 07:26
How not so?

Oh, I dunno, perhaps the blatantly untrue claim that the indigenous people of North America were in some sort of privileged position prior to the Trail of Tears, or the outlandish assumption that those relatively few indigenous people who had enough political/economic clout to bargain with European colonizers in exchange for slaves are appropriate representations of American Indians as a group.