Log in

View Full Version : Feral capitalism hits the streets



Die Neue Zeit
14th August 2011, 16:09
http://www.counterpunch.org/harvey08122011.html



By David Harvey

“Nihilistic and feral teenagers” the Daily Mail called them: the crazy youths from all walks of life who raced around the streets mindlessly and desperately hurling bricks, stones and bottles at the cops while looting here and setting bonfires there, leading the authorities on a merry chase of catch-as-catch-can as they tweeted their way from one strategic target to another.

The word “feral” pulled me up short. It reminded me of how the communards in Paris in 1871 were depicted as wild animals, as hyenas, that deserved to be (and often were) summarily executed in the name of the sanctity of private property, morality, religion, and the family. But then the word conjured up another association: Tony Blair attacking the “feral media,” having for so long been comfortably lodged in the left pocket of Rupert Murdoch only later to be substituted as Murdoch reached into his right pocket to pluck out David Cameron.

There will of course be the usual hysterical debate between those prone to view the riots as a matter of pure, unbridled and inexcusable criminality, and those anxious to contextualize events against a background of bad policing; continuing racism and unjustified persecution of youths and minorities; mass unemployment of the young; burgeoning social deprivation; and a mindless politics of austerity that has nothing to do with economics and everything to do with the perpetuation and consolidation of personal wealth and power. Some may even get around to condemning the meaningless and alienating qualities of so many jobs and so much of daily life in the midst of immense but unevenly distributed potentiality for human flourishing.

If we are lucky, we will have commissions and reports to say all over again what was said of Brixton and Toxteth in the Thatcher years. I say 'lucky' because the feral instincts of the current Prime Minister seem more attuned to turn on the water cannons, to call in the tear gas brigade and use the rubber bullets while pontificating unctuously about the loss of moral compass, the decline of civility and the sad deterioration of family values and discipline among errant youths.

But the problem is that we live in a society where capitalism itself has become rampantly feral. Feral politicians cheat on their expenses, feral bankers plunder the public purse for all its worth, CEOs, hedge fund operators and private equity geniuses loot the world of wealth, telephone and credit card companies load mysterious charges on everyone's bills, shopkeepers price gouge, and, at the drop of a hat swindlers and scam artists get to practice three-card monte right up into the highest echelons of the corporate and political world.

A political economy of mass dispossession, of predatory practices to the point of daylight robbery, particularly of the poor and the vulnerable, the unsophisticated and the legally unprotected, has become the order of the day. Does anyone believe it is possible to find an honest capitalist, an honest banker, an honest politician, an honest shopkeeper or an honest police commissioner any more? Yes, they do exist. But only as a minority that everyone else regards as stupid. Get smart. Get Easy Profits. Defraud and steal! The odds of getting caught are low. And in any case there are plenty of ways to shield personal wealth from the costs of corporate malfeasance.

What I say may sound shocking. Most of us don't see it because we don't want to. Certainly no politician dare say it and the press would only print it to heap scorn upon the sayer. But my guess is that every street rioter knows exactly what I mean. They are only doing what everyone else is doing, though in a different way -- more blatantly and visibly in the streets. Thatcherism unchained the feral instincts of capitalism (the “animal spirits” of the entrepreneur they coyly named it) and nothing has transpired to curb them since. Slash and burn is now openly the motto of the ruling classes pretty much everywhere.

This is the new normal in which we live. This is what the next grand commission of enquiry should address. Everyone, not just the rioters, should be held to account. Feral capitalism should be put on trial for crimes against humanity as well as for crimes against nature.

Sadly, this is what these mindless rioters cannot see or demand. Everything conspires to prevent us from seeing and demanding it also. This is why political power so hastily dons the robes of superior morality and unctuous reason so that no one might see it as so nakedly corrupt and stupidly irrational.

But there are various glimmers of hope and Light around the world. The indignados movements in Spain and Greece, the revolutionary impulses in Latin America, the peasant movements in Asia, are all beginning to see through the vast scam that a predatory and feral global capitalism has unleashed upon the world. What will it take for the rest of us to see and act upon it? How can we begin all over again? What direction should we take? The answers are not easy. But one thing we do know for certain: we can only get to the right answers by asking the right questions.

Desperado
14th August 2011, 16:40
It's quite popular among the left at the moment for some nostalgic idea that the rich have performed a coup (in the 80s with Thatcher, or with Raegan in America) and are now at the helm of our society - that is, neo-liberalism. It's obvious that neo-liberalism is a new attack on the working class, a more efficient form of exploitation suited for our times, but capitalism is capitalism, and the rich being in charge is nothing new. We musn't let Michael Moores and Compass thinktanks paint the post-war years as the good ol democratic days - the soft "socialism" they seem to vaguely (and inevitably vainly) call for. Just as we must attack capitalists and parties, not let it the anger be channelled only at bankers and Tories (though these can be the vanguard of opening a discussion with the public) - the same goes for attacking capitalism in all forms, not branding it simply as the small state neo-liberalism of the day.

Not that Harvey does that, but even he seems to catch on to some of this rhetoric in the above article (which is still well said, but not rocket science).

Jose Gracchus
14th August 2011, 18:59
Its hiding in his underconsumptionism as well. A lot of the so-called left in essence has no program but historically dead left-Keynesianism.

Thirsty Crow
14th August 2011, 23:39
Honestly, I didn't expect that this piece will turn out as it is, and by "They are only doing what everyone else is doing, though in a different way -- more blatantly and visibly in the streets" I was experiencing a moment of recollection of what crap politics Harvey peddles. It seems as if the guy is unaware that, bringing up the example, the Spanish "indignados" movement is effectively dead, and that it never was a potent vehicle for putting forward even reformist demands.
No wonder that he's unable to recognize the difference and no wonder he's unable to sharpen up his analysis to a point where finer details can be uncovered.
And this is just precious:

Sadly, this is what these mindless rioters cannot see or demandHow the fuck does that old fart come up with an idea that acts of violence mechanically imply a lack of understanding? Shit, he's acting as if it was a political action gone wrong. No, he doesn't even understand what happened.

Nehru
15th August 2011, 05:17
How the fuck does that old fart come up with an idea that acts of violence mechanically imply a lack of understanding?

Must you abuse the people you disagree with? You've misunderstood him. He's attacking the middle-class morality (and hypocrisy) of most people - whenever politicians, bankers and the rest do much worse on a large-scale, there is no moral outrage; whereas a mob on the streets provokes a sterner reaction. The author is merely pointing to the double standards of it all.

Thirsty Crow
15th August 2011, 12:33
Must you abuse the people you disagree with? You've misunderstood him. He's attacking the middle-class morality (and hypocrisy) of most people - whenever politicians, bankers and the rest do much worse on a large-scale, there is no moral outrage; whereas a mob on the streets provokes a sterner reaction. The author is merely pointing to the double standards of it all.

No, I didn't misunderstand what I specified as parts of the statement which I cannot agree with and which betray a lack of understanding on Harvey's behalf. He is pointing out the moral hypocrisy and double standards, but that's not all he is doing:



But my guess is that every street rioter knows exactly what I mean. They are only doing what everyone else is doing, though in a different way -- more blatantly and visibly in the streets. Thatcherism unchained the feral instincts of capitalism (the “animal spirits” of the entrepreneur they coyly named it) and nothing has transpired to curb them since. Slash and burn is now openly the motto of the ruling classes pretty much everywhere.

This is the new normal in which we live. This is what the next grand commission of enquiry should address. Everyone, not just the rioters, should be held to account. Feral capitalism should be put on trial for crimes against humanity as well as for crimes against nature.

Sadly, this is what these mindless rioters cannot see or demand. Everything conspires to prevent us from seeing and demanding it also. This is why political power so hastily dons the robes of superior morality and unctuous reason so that no one might see it as so nakedly corrupt and stupidly irrational.
He is speculating that the rioters' actions are a direct, unmediated reflection of the actions of the capitalist class. Their acts are analogous to the acts of capitalists who have been unchained by the political shift whose outward signs are Thatcher and Reagan.
Moreover, he's also speculating that these youths are "mindless" and cannot see the reality of what he's describing. There are at least two implications here:

1) that any kind of violence implies a lack of reasoning, reflection or even a lack of the ability to think about certain phenomena

2) that these youths, marginalized and criminalized as they are with respect to the actions of the police, are in absolute inferior position with respect to enlightened "leftists" such as David Harvey

The first implication is just speculative and really indicative of the politics of the person in question. Trust me, I had my chance to assess Harvey's politics and I'm sorry to say that his politics is utterly bankrupt. Incidentally, this overt pacifism prevents him from understanding the function of the repressive state apparatuses in capitalist society.

And there is yet another serious mistake in Harvey's reasoning. He's assuming that these riots are analogous to political actions - organizd struggle around specific demands formed by a certain knowledge about the world and a certain (class) interest.
But the riots are not explicitly political. They are not organized as political struggle. If we are to recognize this, then we would have to conclude that Harvey's one sided assessment of rioters mechanically reflecting the drive to accumulate capital by any means necessary is faulty at best, and a clear expression of his reformist, pro-capitalist politics at worst.

I mean, think about it, the fact that some of the youth attacked the police becomes a reflection of the actions of the stock market traders driven by the imperative to realize profits and yet more profits. Attacking an embodiment of repression becomes the same as profit making which steps out of the framework of legal, appropriate economic activity.
This is just a gross misunderstanding of the world.

Hoipolloi Cassidy
15th August 2011, 12:48
I recall a Situationist article published about the time of the Watts riot that said substantially the same thing as Harvey: that the looter (#rioters) were re-enacting the values of consumer society and throwing them in the face of capital.

I do agree that Harvey's assumption that this re-enactment is "mindless' is problematic. Inner-city residents handle post-modern irony pretty well...